
HMRC’s latest annual report shows that losses from small-business phoenixing reached £836 million in 2022–23, a 45% increase on previous estimates. The practice now accounts for about a fifth of HMRC’s overall tax losses. The Chancellor has announced plans to tackle the problem through joint action by HMRC, Companies House and the Insolvency Service.
In this article, we will explain what phoenixing is, why it is a particular problem among small businesses, and outline the penalties that directors face when using it illegally. We will also explore how HMRC investigates phoenixing, the warning signs it looks for, the role of Companies House, and the resources available to help businesses avoid accidental breaches. Finally, we will set out how Apex Accountants can provide expert support to help directors stay compliant and protect their business from risk.
Phoenixing (sometimes called “phoenix trading”) occurs when a company enters insolvent liquidation and the directors form a new company using the same or similar name in order to continue trading. The new entity often carries on the same business but without the liabilities of the former company, leaving creditors (including HMRC) unpaid. HMRC’s internal manual on the Targeted Anti‑Avoidance Rule (TAAR) notes that phoenixism allows individuals to convert what would otherwise be dividends into capital receipts; the new company “rises from the ashes” of the old one. Deliberately using phoenixing to escape tax liabilities is illegal.
Small‑business phoenixing is the abuse of this tactic by directors of small and micro companies. The Insolvency Service reports that phoenixing often involves close companies (five or fewer shareholders) where the owners have a 5% or greater shareholding. HMRC estimates that about 81% of tax evasion losses come from small businesses, with a significant portion linked to phoenixism. Retail and construction sectors are particularly vulnerable to this abuse.
Phoenixing takes place when a company is closed down and a new business is created in its place.
When directors deliberately shed liabilities and start again debt-free, HMRC treats it as tax evasion.
The most recent data shows that phoenixing made up nearly 20% of HMRC’s total tax losses. The pandemic delayed insolvency declarations, which contributed to the rise. Reports also suggest the practice is common among small firms, particularly in retail and construction.
The Chancellor has pledged stronger action. A joint strategy now links HMRC, Companies House, and the Insolvency Service. Planned measures include:
These steps aim to stop deliberate abuse while still allowing genuine business recovery.
Penalties for illegal phoenixing vary depending on the circumstances and laws breached:
Useful resources for understanding HMRC’s response include:
HMRC investigates phoenixing through a combination of civil powers, targeted anti‑avoidance rules and criminal enforcement. Key tools include:
HMRC will treat a liquidation distribution as an income distribution (subject to dividend tax) if four conditions are met: the individual held at least a 5% interest; the company was a close company within the previous two years; the individual resumes the same or similar trade within two years; and obtaining a tax advantage was one of the main purposes. HMRC interprets the “similar trade” condition broadly – carrying on the same activity as a sole trader, through a partnership or through another company can trigger the rule. The TAAR denies the lower capital gains tax rate, thereby removing the tax benefit of phoenixing.
Under Finance Act 2020, HMRC can issue a notice making directors or participants personally liable for the tax debts of companies where there is repeated insolvency followed by phoenixing. Once issued, the individual becomes jointly and severally liable for the outstanding tax.
HMRC works closely with the Insolvency Service to investigate breaches of company and insolvency law. The Insolvency Service’s annual report notes that phoenixing is a priority and gives examples where directors have been prosecuted and disqualified for breaching section 216 of the Insolvency Act 1986; one director received an eight‑month suspended prison sentence and a five‑year director disqualification for operating multiple phoenix companies.
New powers allow Companies House to share data with HMRC and the Insolvency Service, remove incorrect information and strike companies off the register more quickly. HMRC uses this data to identify patterns of repeated insolvency, suspicious director activity and false addresses.
HMRC can require businesses considered high risk (for example, those with a history of default) to provide a security deposit before trading. The transformation roadmap indicates that HMRC will increase use of these securities to deter phoenixism.
Directors who want to avoid inadvertently falling foul of the anti‑phoenix rules should:
Anyone can report suspected phoenixing or tax evasion to HMRC by:
For fraudulent use of the dissolution process, members of the public can also complain to Companies House using its “Report it to us” service. This supports HMRC and the Insolvency Service in identifying misuse of company dissolutions.
HMRC and the Insolvency Service look for patterns that indicate abusive phoenixing. Common warning signs include:
Business owners should seek advice if they see these signs within their own organisation or when dealing with suppliers or contractors.
Companies House is no longer simply a passive register. The Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023 has given it new powers to play an active role in preventing phoenixism and economic crime. According to Companies House’s 2024‑25 business plan:
By improving the accuracy of company data and working with other agencies, Companies House helps identify repeated insolvency patterns, suspicious director behaviour and fraudulent filings. This data supports HMRC’s investigations and allows early intervention.
We support tighter rules to reduce the abuse of insolvency law. However, legitimate business owners who need to restructure should not be penalised. The right advice can help companies exit financial distress while staying fully compliant.
At Apex Accountants, we provide:
Small-business phoenixing has become a growing concern, with HMRC losses now exceeding £800 million. To address this, HMRC is stepping up its approach through targeted anti-avoidance rules, joint and several liability notices, closer collaboration with Companies House and the Insolvency Service, and tougher penalties for illegal phoenixing.
For directors, it is vital to understand legal duties, recognise early signs of financial distress, and seek timely professional advice before winding up a company. Acting responsibly reduces the risk of breaching anti-phoenixing rules and protects both businesses and the wider tax system.
At Apex Accountants, we support directors in managing company restructuring, compliance, and tax planning in line with HMRC requirements. Our team offers clear, practical guidance to help businesses make the right decisions, avoid penalties, and continue trading on a secure foundation. By working with us, business owners can stay compliant, safeguard their reputation, and contribute to a fairer tax environment.
Contact Apex Accountants today to discuss your company’s position and get tailored advice on compliance, restructuring, and future growth.
The UK government has introduced the High Value Council Tax Surcharge, also known as the mansion tax, which will impact...
Environmental and sustainable businesses often struggle with a recurring problem. Costs for research, compliance, and materials arrive early, while income...
The deadline for self-assessment tax returns is fast approaching, and the thought of completing it can be overwhelming. But don’t...
Many UK workers are missing out on changes to pension tax relief worth hundreds of millions of pounds every year....
The UK hospitality sector is under pressure. Inflation, labour shortages, and rising business rates are squeezing margins for hotel and...
Environmental businesses often focus on impact first. VAT problems appear later. Misclassified supplies, late registrations, or cross-border mistakes increase cost...
Environmental and sustainable businesses invest early and heavily. Research costs rise, production trials fail, and returns arrive late. Corporation tax...
Educational content creators often face a cycle that feels hard to break. Cash comes in late, production costs rise early,...
Educational content developers selling digital courses across the UK and overseas face rising VAT demands as digital learning expands. A...
Voluntary carbon credits now sit in a very different VAT position in the UK. For years, HMRC treated most voluntary...