Balancing the Best Salary and Dividend Split for Directors 2026/27

A rise in dividend tax rates for the 2026/27 tax year and the continued freeze on personal allowances have narrowed the gap between remuneration through payroll and payouts of company profits. While a mix of salaries and dividends remains attractive, determining the best salary and dividend split for directors in 2026/27 requires a clear understanding of tax rules and the broader compliance environment.

The shifting tax landscape

The starting point for any remuneration decision is understanding the current tax thresholds for 2026/27, which form the basis of any salary and dividend strategy for UK company directors.

Key income tax thresholds:

  • Personal Allowance: £12,570 (no income tax)
  • Basic rate: 20% on income up to £37,700 above the allowance
  • Higher rate: 40% up to £125,140
  • Additional rate: 45% above £125,140

National Insurance thresholds:

  • Lower Earnings Limit: £129 per week (£6,708 per year)
  • Primary Threshold: £242 per week (£12,570 per year)
  • Secondary Threshold: £96 per week (£5,000 per year)

Employer National Insurance becomes payable once salary exceeds the secondary threshold, which is significantly lower than the income tax threshold.

Dividend taxation:

  • Dividend allowance: £500 (tax-free)
  • Basic rate: 10.75%
  • Higher rate: 35.75%
  • Additional rate: 39.35%

Corporation tax rates:

  • 19% for profits up to £50,000
  • 25% for profits above £250,000
  • Marginal relief applies between these limits

Beyond tax rates, two practical considerations shape how directors structure their income.

Employment Allowance

  • Reduces employer National Insurance liability by up to £10,500
  • Not available to single-director companies with no additional employees
  • As a result, sole directors must account for employer NIC on salaries above £5,000

National Minimum Wage rules

  • Generally do not apply to directors acting purely as office-holders
  • Apply only where a director has a formal employment contract
  • This allows flexibility in setting salary levels within tax-efficient limits 

Salary: securing tax relief but triggering contributions

Salary paid through payroll reduces taxable profits and therefore lowers corporation tax. It also counts as “qualifying income” for the state pension if it exceeds the lower earnings limit. Directors pay National Insurance on annual earnings above the primary threshold; HMRC notes that contributions are calculated on the director’s total annual income. Employers, however, must pay contributions on salary above the secondary threshold, regardless of whether the employee is a director.

For 2026/27, there are two frequently discussed salary points:

Lower earnings limit (£6,708 per year)

Paying a salary just above this limit secures a qualifying year for the state pension and avoids employee National Insurance contributions because the threshold for contributions is £12,570. However, because the secondary threshold is only £5,000, the company pays employer National Insurance on the difference (£1,708) at 15%, costing roughly £256. Salaries at this level provide limited corporation tax relief because the salary is small.

Personal allowance (£12,570 per year)

A salary equal to the personal allowance remains free of income tax, which maximises corporate tax relief. For sole‑director companies, the salary exceeds the £5,000 secondary threshold, so employer National Insurance of 15% applies to £7,570, an approximate cost of £1,135. Nevertheless, an additional £5,862 of salary (the difference between £12,570 and £6,708) at the 19% small‑profits rate saves about £1,114 in corporation tax, offsetting much of the employer NIC bill. Companies that qualify for the Employment Allowance will have the first £10,500 of employer NIC covered, so a salary at the personal‑allowance level can be paid free of income tax and National Insurance.

Because directors’ National Insurance is calculated annually, it is straightforward to make a single year-end adjustment if multiple payrolls have been run during the year. Importantly, there is no legal obligation to pay the national minimum wage to directors without employment contracts, so setting a salary at a low level is lawful when there is no contract of employment.

Dividends: attractive but subject to restrictions

Dividends can only be paid from profits after corporation tax. They can’t be deducted for corporation tax, and if profits are low, they’re treated as a loan. HMRC’s director‑information hub points out that dividends must be formally declared and recorded and can be paid at any time, but only from retained profits. Unlike salary, dividends are not subject to National Insurance. However, the tax-free dividend allowance is now just £500, and the rate for basic-rate taxpayers has increased to 10.75% from April 2026. The higher‑rate dividend tax is 35.75%, which erodes much of the advantage relative to salary once income exceeds £50,270.

Because dividends fall on top of salary, directors must consider the combined income when estimating their tax band. Taking large dividends without sufficient profits may also breach company law: directors risk personal liability if they knowingly authorise unlawful distributions. Dividends cannot be used to avoid National Insurance, which is, in reality, employment income, and HMRC has wide powers to reclassify disguised remuneration as salary.

Constructing the best salary and dividend split for directors 2026/27

A balanced approach typically involves a mix of salary and dividends, although the optimal split varies depending on profits and individual circumstances. Key considerations include the following:

  • Assess profit levels. Dividends are only possible if the company has retained profits. Start by estimating expected profits after salary and overheads to identify the amount available for distribution.
  • Choose a salary level. For sole-director companies, paying a salary equal to the personal allowance (£12,570) supports effective tax planning for directors’ salaries and dividends UK by maximising corporation-tax relief and ensuring state-pension credit; employer NIC costs are partially offset by corporation-tax savings.

If cash flow is tight or profits are small, a salary just above the lower earnings limit (£6,708) avoids income tax and employee NIC but still triggers employer NIC and yields less corporation tax relief.

  • Manage employer National Insurance. Companies with more than one employee can claim the Employment Allowance and offset up to £10,500 of employer NIC. If eligible, the allowance makes a salary of £12,570 more attractive because both employee and employer NIC may be nil.
  • Stay within the basic rate band. Where possible, keep total income (salary plus dividends) under £50,270 to avoid the 35.75% dividend tax rate. If income exceeds this band, consider timing dividends over multiple tax years or using pension contributions to reduce taxable income.
  • Document dividends properly. Prepare board minutes and dividend vouchers. Ensure dividends are not disguised loans or payments for services. Misclassification can trigger HMRC enquiries and penalties.
  • Consider other allowances. Company pension contributions are tax-deductible and not considered employment income, making them a beneficial part of the pay mix. Similarly, you can provide legitimate benefits like mobile phones or health checks, incurring only modest Class 1A NIC costs.

While many directors still favour a salary of £12,570 and dividends up to the basic rate threshold, a tailored salary and dividend strategy for UK company directors is essential because every company’s circumstances differ. Profit levels, cash requirements, eligibility for the Employment Allowance, and personal tax situations (such as the high‑income child benefit charge or tapered pension annual allowance) should all be considered. HMRC’s consultation on reporting payments to participators indicates greater scrutiny on how owner‑managed companies extract profits, so documentation and compliance are increasingly important.

How Apex Accountants & Tax Advisors can assist

Navigating the interplay between salary, dividends and corporation tax requires careful tax planning for directors salary and dividends UK. Apex Accountants & Tax Advisors can:

  • run payrolls and advise on the most tax‑efficient salary level for your company;
  • calculate corporation‑tax savings versus National Insurance costs based on your profit projections;
  • ensure dividends are legal by reviewing retained earnings and preparing board minutes;
  • assess eligibility for the Employment Allowance and other reliefs;
  • integrate pension contributions and other benefits into your remuneration package;
  • monitor legislative changes, including consultations on participant payments.

By tailoring our advice to your circumstances, we help you maximise your takeout earnings while staying within the rules. Contact Apex Accountants today for a confidential discussion or book a free consultation to review your 2026/27 remuneration strategy.

Frequently asked questions

What is the dividend allowance in 2026/27?

The dividend allowance, which is taxed at 0%, is £500 for the 2026/27 tax year. You can receive dividends up to this amount, in addition to your personal allowance, without paying dividend tax. Any dividend income above this threshold is taxed at 10.75% in the basic rate band and 35.75% in the higher‑rate band.

Do directors have to pay National Insurance on dividends?

No. Dividends are distributions of post‑tax profits and are not subject to National Insurance. However, dividends can only be paid from retained profits and are taxed separately as income.

What is the minimum salary I need to qualify for the state pension?

To accrue a qualifying year for state pension purposes, your salary must exceed the lower earnings limit, which is £6,708 per year in 2026/27. Paying yourself at or above this level secures your National Insurance record, even though you do not pay employee NIC until your salary exceeds £12,570.

Can my company pay dividends if it makes a loss?

No. HMRC’s guidance states that dividends can only be paid from retained company profits and must be formally declared. Taking dividends when there are no profits is illegal and is treated as a loan.

What is the Employment Allowance and can my company claim it?

The Employment Allowance allows eligible employers to reduce their annual employer National Insurance liability by up to £10,500. To qualify, your business must have at least two employees or directors and must not be caught by the single‑director exclusion or other restrictions. Sole‑director companies with no other staff cannot claim the allowance.

Is there a ‘best’ salary and dividend split for every director?

There is no one‑size‑fits‑all answer. A salary equal to the personal allowance (£12,570) with dividends up to the basic rate limit (£50,270 total income) is often efficient because there is no Income tax on salaries and dividends is lower than income tax. However, the optimal mix depends on your profits, eligibility for the employment allowance, your personal tax situation, and your cash flow needs. Professional advice ensures that you remain compliant and make the most of available allowances.

CIS Fraud Rules for Contractors UK Tighten: Miss Fraud, Pay the Price

Starting 6 April 2026, CIS fraud rules for contractors in the UK will make them responsible for spotting fraud in their supply chains. HMRC’s new powers mean that businesses that fail to perform proper checks on subcontractors may lose tax privileges, be assessed for unpaid taxes, and face personal penalties. This article explains the changes and outlines practical steps for UK construction firms.

What has changed

In the Autumn 2025 Budget, the government announced legislation amending Part 3, Chapter 3 of the Finance Act 2004, and the Income Tax (Construction Industry Scheme) Regulations 2005. Starting in April 2026, HMRC can take action against a business that was aware or should have been aware of a payment’s connection to fraudulent tax evasion. Three consequences follow:

  • Gross payment status (GPS) can be cancelled without notice. Businesses that receive payments without deductions can lose this privilege immediately. Once cancelled, they cannot reapply for five years and must suffer 20% CIS deductions on all payments.
  • Liability for lost tax. If HMRC establishes a fraud link, the business may be assessed for the tax that was evaded. Even contractors who complied with their obligations could end up paying a subcontractor’s unpaid income tax and National Insurance.
  • Penalties of up to 30%. HMRC can charge a penalty of up to 30% of the lost tax to the business and, importantly, to its directors and other connected parties. RSM UK warns that officers could be held personally liable for failure to detect fraud.

The reforms mirror the VAT Kittel test, where businesses can lose tax deductions if they knew or should have known about fraud.

Why it matters and who is affected

The reforms significantly increase accountability within the Construction Industry Scheme, strengthening CIS compliance for construction contractors in the UK. HMRC’s position is clear: responsibility for identifying fraud no longer sits only with the fraudulent party. It applies to any business that knew or should have known of the fraud risk.

Under the updated rules, HMRC can:

  • Remove Gross Payment Status immediately
  • Hold the business liable for the tax loss
  • Apply penalties to both the business and individuals connected to it

These powers apply to businesses that have engaged in transactions linked to fraudulent tax evasion, even indirectly. HMRC’s guidance confirms that the measures target businesses that knowingly participate in or fail to challenge suspicious arrangements within their supply chain.

Importantly, the scope extends beyond deliberate wrongdoing. The inclusion of the phrase “should have known” places a clear expectation on businesses to carry out appropriate due diligence before entering into transactions.

The measures are designed to target a minority of non-compliant businesses, rather than the wider sector. HMRC explicitly states that compliant businesses conducting proper checks should not face any repercussions.

However, the practical implication is broader. Contractors operating within CIS must now demonstrate that they took reasonable steps to:

  • Assess the legitimacy of subcontractors
  • Review the nature of transactions
  • Identify indicators of potential fraud

If you don’t, you may be liable for fraud, even if your business didn’t profit from it.

These changes reflect a wider policy objective: reducing tax losses, disrupting organised fraud within construction supply chains, and maintaining fair competition across the sector.

The cost of failing to spot fraud

The consequences under the revised CIS rules are direct and enforceable under UK tax legislation.

HMRC can take action if it determines that a business knew or should have known about a payment’s connection to fraudulent tax evasion.

  • Cancel Gross Payment Status immediately under Finance Act 2004 provisions
  • Prevent reapplication for up to five years
  • Assess the business for the tax loss linked to the fraudulent transaction
  • Charge penalties on the business and connected persons, including directors

HMRC’s internal CIS reform guidance confirms that liability can arise even where the business has met its tax obligations if it entered into a transaction connected to fraud.

Therefore, the financial exposure can encompass the following, especially when construction businesses in the UK fail to manage the CIS fraud risk effectively:

  • Repayment of tax that was never directly owed by the contractor
  • Additional penalties based on the lost tax
  • Ongoing cash flow pressure where CIS deductions apply after loss of gross payment status

Beyond the immediate tax impact, HMRC expects businesses to demonstrate that they have taken reasonable steps to prevent involvement in fraudulent arrangements. Failure to do so increases the risk of being treated as having participated in non-compliance within the supply chain.

Practical steps to reduce exposure

HMRC guidance remains consistent: CIS compliance for construction contractors in the UK requires businesses to conduct appropriate and documented due diligence to avoid these measures. The emphasis lies on the actions taken to ensure their reasonableness.

A defensible approach should include:

  • Verify subcontractor status with HMRC
    Confirm CIS registration and payment status before making any payment. HMRC expects businesses to rely on verified information rather than assumptions.
  • Assess the commercial credibility of transactions
    HMRC guidance highlights that businesses should question arrangements that appear inconsistent with normal commercial practice, including pricing that appears unrealistic.
  • Identify and investigate risk indicators
    HMRC refers to circumstances where a reasonable person would suspect non-compliance. These include unusual structures, unclear payment flows, or inconsistencies in business activity.
  • Maintain clear and contemporaneous records
    Evidence of due diligence is critical. HMRC places weight on documented checks, risk assessments, and decisions made at the time of the transaction.
  • Apply ongoing monitoring, not one-time checks
    The “should have known” test considers what a business ought to have identified over time. Regular review of subcontractors and transactions is therefore expected.
  • Establish internal procedures and accountability
    Businesses should ensure that staff responsible for engaging subcontractors understand CIS obligations and escalation processes where concerns arise.

The key point is not perfection, but demonstrable, reasonable action. HMRC’s test is based on what a competent business in the same position would have done, given the information available at the time.

How Apex Accountants can help you manage CIS fraud exposure

The updated CIS rules place clear responsibility on contractors to identify and address CIS fraud risk for construction businesses in the UK. Apex Accountants & Tax Advisors provides practical, focused support to help you meet these expectations with confidence.

We can:

  • Assess your current supply chain checks and identify gaps
  • Strengthen due diligence processes in line with HMRC expectations
  • Support accurate and timely CIS reporting and filings
  • Build simple, risk-based frameworks for subcontractor verification
  • Train your team to identify warning signs and act early
  • Assist with HMRC reviews, enquiries and compliance matters

Contact Apex Accountants today for tailored support.

FAQs

When do the new CIS measures start? 

They apply starting April 6, 2026.

What triggers loss of gross payment status? 

HMRC can cancel GPS if it proves that a business knew or should have known that a payment was connected to fraud.

How long is the reapplication ban? 

If GPS is revoked under the new rules, the business cannot reapply for five years.

What penalties apply? 

The HMRC may assess the lost tax and charge a penalty of up to 30 %, which can apply to directors.

What due diligence does HMRC expect? 

Verify CIS registrations, check market rates, investigate red flags, and keep detailed records.

Finance Act 2026 Granted Royal Assent: Key Tax Changes Explained

The Finance Act 2026 is the latest UK tax law to come out of the government’s annual budget process. It received Royal Assent on 18 March 2026, which means it has now passed through Parliament and become law. In practical terms, it gives legal effect to a range of tax measures announced in Budget 2025 and set out in the Finance Bill 2025-26.

For businesses, investors, advisers, landlords, and high-net-worth individuals, this matters because the Finance Act is where tax announcements stop being proposals and start becoming enforceable legislation. Some measures take effect from Royal Assent, while others start on later dates such as 6 April 2026 or 6 April 2027.

Key facts at a glance

PointDetail
NameFinance Act 2026
Chapter numberc. 11
Royal Assent18 March 2026
OriginFinance Bill 2025-26
Main purposeTo implement tax measures announced in Budget 2025 and renew annual tax provisions
Why it mattersIt turns tax policy into law

What is the new UK Finance Act 2026?

The Finance Act is the main annual tax law passed by Parliament. Each year, the chancellor announces tax measures in the budget. The government then introduces a finance bill to put those measures into legislation. Once Parliament approves the bill and it receives Royal Assent, it becomes the Finance Act for that year.

So, the Finance Act 2026 is the law that followed Budget 2025. It is not just one tax change. It is a package of tax rules, rate changes, relief reforms, compliance rules, and administrative measures.

What is the purpose of the Finance Act?

The purpose of the Finance Act is simple. It gives legal force to the government’s tax decisions. Without it, many budget announcements would remain proposals only. The House of Commons Library notes that the annual Finance Bill is used to implement the tax measures set out in the Chancellor’s statement, and at least one Finance Bill is needed each year because taxes such as income tax and corporation tax must be renewed by legislation annually.

In short, the Finance Act does three main jobs:

  • Sets or renews annual tax charges
  • Changes tax rates, reliefs, and allowances
  • Updates HMRC powers, compliance rules, and tax administration

What is included in the Finance Act 2026?

The Finance Act 2026 is broad, but some of the most significant measures include the following.

1. Changes to dividend and savings income taxation

Budget 2025 confirmed that legislation would be introduced in Finance Bill 2025-26 to increase dividend income tax rates from 6 April 2026. It also set out later changes to savings income rates from 6 April 2027.

2. Reform of carried interest taxation

The government said Finance Bill 2025-26 would move carried interest into an Income Tax framework from April 2026. That is an important shift for affected fund managers and investment structures.

3. Agricultural Property Relief and Business Property Relief changes

One of the most discussed parts of the Act is the reform of Agricultural Property Relief (APR) and Business Property Relief (BPR). HMRC’s policy papers state that, from 6 April 2026, a new £1 million allowance applies to the combined value of qualifying property attracting 100% relief, with 50% relief applying above that allowance in the cases covered by the reform.

4. Mandatory registration of tax advisers

Finance Act 2026 also supports a new regime requiring tax advisers who deal with HMRC on behalf of clients to register and meet minimum standards. HMRC says this will begin in May 2026, with a transitional period of at least three months.

5. EIS and VCT changes

Budget 2025 also said Finance Bill 2025-26 would increase the investment and gross asset limits in the Enterprise Investment Scheme (EIS) and Venture Capital Trust (VCT) rules, while reducing VCT income tax relief from 30% to 20%, with changes taking effect from 6 April 2026.

6. Inheritance Tax changes affecting pensions

HMRC has also published material showing that legislation in the Finance Bill 2025-26 would bring most unused pension funds and pension death benefits into scope for inheritance tax from 6 April 2027. That gives individuals and families time to review estate planning before the rules bite.

Why Finance Act 2026 matters

This Act matters because it affects both current planning and future planning.

For some taxpayers, the immediate issue is compliance. For others, it is timing. A measure may now be law, but its effective date may still be months away. That distinction is vital when making decisions on share structures, succession planning, investment, remuneration, or tax advice arrangements.

It also matters because Finance Acts often shape behaviour before the start date arrives. For example:

  • families may revisit succession and estate plans
  • tax advisers may prepare for registration rules
  • investors may review EIS or VCT timing
  • businesses may reassess dividend extraction strategies
  • affected individuals may review pension and carried interest planning

How We Help You Understand And Navigate The Upcoming Changes

At Apex Accountants, we help clients understand what a new finance act means in real terms.

Our support includes:

  • tax planning for business owners and investors
  • inheritance tax and estate planning reviews
  • EIS and VCT guidance
  • remuneration and dividend planning
  • compliance support for advisers and firms
  • practical reviews of how new tax law affects your structure, timing, and reporting

Conclusion

The Finance Act 2026 in UK is now law. It received Royal Assent on 18 March 2026, and it brings a wide range of Budget 2025 tax measures into the statute book. Some changes apply now. Others start from 6 April 2026 or 6 April 2027. Either way, this is the point where proposals become rules.

For anyone affected, the key step is not just knowing that the Act exists. It is knowing which part applies to you, when it starts, and what action should be taken before the deadline arrives.

FAQs About The Finance Act 2006 in UK

1. Is there a finance act every year?

Yes. In practice, there is at least one Finance Bill each year because annual taxes such as income tax and corporation tax must be renewed by legislation. Once passed, that bill becomes the Finance Act.

2. What is the Finance Act in UK in simple terms?

It is the annual law that turns Budget tax announcements into enforceable UK tax legislation.

3. Which Finance Act is applicable for FY 2024-25?

For the UK tax year 2024-25, the main annual legislation is Finance Act 2024. That said, tax law can later be amended by subsequent Finance Acts, so the exact rule depends on the issue and the date the relevant provision takes effect.

HMRC’s Transfer Pricing and Diverted Profits Tax Data Sends a Clear Message to Multinationals

HMRC’s latest figures show a sharp rise in transfer pricing yield, longer enquiry timelines, and a continued focus on profit diversion. For large groups with UK operations, this is not just a statistical update. It is a sign that international tax risk remains high on HMRC’s agenda. The latest publication, released on 11 March 2026, shows a transfer pricing yield of £3.387 billion for 2024–25, up from £1.786 billion a year earlier. At the same time, the average age of settled transfer pricing enquiries rose to 41 months.

At Apex Accountants, we see this data as important for any multinational group, UK subsidiary, or mid-sized business with cross-border related-party transactions. The numbers point to a tougher and more persistent compliance environment. They also arrive just as the UK moves away from Diverted Profits Tax as a standalone regime and toward the new Unassessed Transfer Pricing Profits, or UTPP, rules for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2026.

Snapshot of Transfer Pricing and Diverted Profits Tax

Measure2023–242024–25What it suggests
Transfer pricing yield£1.786bn£3.387bnHMRC secured much more tax from international tax work
Settled enquiry cases128143Case closures rose, but not dramatically
Average age of settled enquiries33.1 months41.0 monthsDisputes are taking longer to resolve
HMRC staff on international tax issues395392Resource stayed broadly stable
APAs agreed2726Advance certainty remains available
MAP cases resolved86115Double tax dispute resolution activity increased
DPT net amount£108m£94mThe direct DPT take fell, even while wider diverted profits work remained significant

What UK transfer pricing rules means in simple terms

Transfer pricing is about how connected companies price transactions between themselves for tax purposes. That includes charges for goods, services, financing, royalties, and other cross-border dealings inside the same group. UK transfer pricing rules are based on the arm’s length principle. HMRC requires these transactions to follow the same pricing standards used between independent businesses.

Transfer pricing plays a key role in deciding how much profit is reported for UK tax purposes. If HMRC believes too little profit has been allocated here, it can challenge the position and increase taxable profits. Under UK rules, a transfer pricing adjustment can increase taxable profits or reduce a loss. It cannot reduce profits or increase a loss.

Why the 2024–25 figures matter

The headline number is the £3.387 billion transfer pricing yield. That is the highest figure in the six-year data series shown by HMRC. It is almost double the previous year’s result. Even without a huge increase in settled case numbers, the yield surge suggests HMRC closed some large and complex cases with significant tax at stake. That is an inference from the published figures, not a statement HMRC makes directly.

The second key point is timing. Settled enquiries averaged 41 months in 2024–25, up from 33.1 months in 2023–24. For finance teams, that means international tax disputes can remain open for years. The cost is not only tax. It also means management time, documentation pressure, audit scrutiny, and uncertainty in forecasting.

HMRC assigned 392 full-time equivalent staff to handle international tax issues concerning multinational businesses in 2024–25. The modest change from the prior year suggests enforcement efforts remain steady.

UK Diverted Profits Tax is changing, but the risk is not disappearing

Diverted Profits Tax, or DPT, was designed to push large companies away from contrived arrangements that reduce UK tax liabilities. HMRC’s latest statistics say DPT will be repealed and replaced by UTPP for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2026. The new rules are intended to retain the core features of DPT but move the charge into the corporation tax regime.

That change matters for two reasons. First, DPT does not vanish overnight. It still applies to earlier accounting periods. Second, the policy direction is continuity rather than retreat. According to the government, UTPP will preserve the reach of DPT and apply to similar structures in a similar way.

There is also a practical upside for some businesses. Government material says UTPP will sit within the UK’s treaty network, and businesses subject to UTPP should be able to use the Mutual Agreement Procedure to deal with double taxation in the usual way. That was a welcome point in the consultation response.

The wider diverted profits picture is still substantial

Although DPT’s net amount for 2024–25 was £94 million, HMRC’s wider diverted profits results were much larger. The department reported £1.769 billion of additional tax, mainly corporation tax, from transfer pricing-settled investigations into diverted profits in 2024–25. Since DPT was introduced in 2015–16, HMRC says more than £10.5 billion has been secured.

By the end of March 2025, HMRC was reviewing approximately 53 multinational cases linked to profit diversion, with roughly £3.5 billion of tax at stake. That shows the compliance pipeline remains active even while the legal framework evolves.

Why PDCF still matters

The Profit Diversion Compliance Facility gives multinational groups a route to review and disclose outstanding liabilities linked to profit diversion. HMRC first launched it in January 2019. In the latest statistics, HMRC says over £872 million of additional revenue has been secured from resolution proposals and behavioural change since their introduction, and that around three quarters of targeted large businesses used the facility.

For some groups, that makes PDCF a risk-management tool rather than a sign of failure. A voluntary review, backed by proper documentation and technical analysis, can be far better than waiting for a long enquiry or a formal notice.

What businesses should do now

If your group has UK cross-border related-party transactions, this is the time to review the basics.

  • Check whether intercompany pricing still matches the arm’s length principle
  • Refresh transfer-pricing documentation and benchmarking
  • Review financing arrangements, royalties, and service charges
  • Revisit permanent establishment and profit diversion risks
  • Consider whether past periods need correction or disclosure
  • Prepare for the move from DPT to UTPP from 1 January 2026 for relevant accounting periods
  • Assess whether MAP, APA, or PDCF could reduce uncertainty in the right case

How We Help Businesses in UK

At Apex Accountants, we help businesses manage international tax risk in a practical and commercially focused way.

Our support includes:

  • transfer pricing risk reviews
  • intercompany pricing policy reviews
  • documentation support and evidence packs
  • cross-border finance and royalty reviews
  • profit diversion risk assessments
  • HMRC enquiry support
  • APA and MAP support
  • tax governance and compliance planning for multinational groups

We focus on clarity, defensible positions, and early action. That is especially important when HMRC enquiries now routinely stretch over several years.

Conclusion

HMRC’s 2024–25 transfer pricing and diverted profits data is a warning sign, not just a technical update. The yield is up sharply. Enquiries are taking longer. Profit diversion remains a live issue. And from 1 January 2026, UTPP will carry that policy forward inside the corporation tax regime.

For businesses with cross-border group transactions, the message is simple. Review your position early, document it properly, and do not treat transfer pricing as a year-end formality. In the current HMRC climate, weak documentation and old assumptions can become expensive. 

FAQs About HMRC’s Transfer Pricing and Diverted Profits Tax

What is transfer pricing?

It refers to the pricing applied to transactions between related companies within the same group. UK tax rules require these prices to match what independent businesses would reasonably agree to in similar circumstances.

What is the Diverted Profits Tax?

It is an anti-avoidance rule targeting large companies that shift profits away from the UK tax base. It still applies to earlier periods, even though UTPP will replace it for future ones.

What is UTPP?

UTPP stands for Unassessed Transfer Pricing Profits. It is the replacement for DPT for accounting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2026, with the charge brought into the corporation tax regime.

Do SMEs need to worry about transfer pricing?

Many small and medium-sized enterprises are still exempt under current UK rules, though there are exceptions and the government has consulted on changes to the SME exemption, including removing the exemption for medium-sized enterprises.

What is an APA?

An Advance Pricing Agreement is an agreement with HMRC that establishes the transfer pricing approach for particular transactions over an agreed period, helping limit future tax disputes.

What is MAP?

The Mutual Agreement Procedure is a treaty-based process that tax authorities use to resolve double taxation disputes. HMRC resolved 115 MAP cases in 2024–25, and UK transfer pricing MAP cases outperformed the global average resolution time in OECD statistics for calendar year 2024.

Bingo duty in the UK stays the same – and is about to vanish

With the UK government reshaping gambling duties, the most striking feature of the Autumn Budget 2025 for bingo halls is what didn’t happen: the bingo tax wasn’t raised. At 10% on bingo promotion profits, the duty has remained unchanged since Chancellor George Osborne halved it in 2014. That steady rate now stands on the brink of abolition; legislation in the Finance Bill 2025‑26 will repeal the duty from 1 April 2026. In other words, bingo duty UK stays the same for one final year before it disappears – a decision that reflects both the Treasury’s revenue strategy and the social role of bingo.

Bingo halls are more than a revenue stream

Bingo may evoke flashing lights and cash prizes, but for many communities it remains a social anchor. A House of Commons briefing observed that around 400 bingo clubs operated across the UK and that the sector raised £75 million in bingo duty in 2012/13. Those halls support jobs and provide social space for older and lower‑income customers, and successive governments have acknowledged that value. When ministers cut the duty from 20% to 10% in 2014, the official policy papers noted that “bingo halls play an important role in their local communities” and that the reduction was intended to support them. Hansard records show then‑Chancellor Osborne telling MPs that bingo duty would be halved to “protect jobs and protect communities”.

The cut had a marked effect: the duty has remained at 10% ever since, even as other gambling taxes rose or were reformed. Industry lobbying and the perception of bingo as a low‑harm, socially embedded activity helped maintain that stability. Contrast that with the introduction of machine games duty, remote gaming duty and other levies in the last decade, which targeted forms of gambling seen as more harmful or more profitable. In that context, the government’s choice to leave bingo duty untouched in the latest Budget was not inertia but deliberate policy.

A tax that stayed the same for a decade

Understanding the stability of the bingo duty requires a brief history. Until 2003, bingo duty was charged on total stakes and added prize money; it then shifted to a gross profits tax at 15%. Financial pressures on the industry saw the rate raised to 22% in 2009 before lobbying prompted a cut to 20 per cent a year later. The 2014 Budget made a bolder move, reducing the rate to 10 per cent from June 2014. That change, justified by the sector’s community role, cost the Exchequer about £30 million in the first year.

Since then, the duty has generated a modest but stable stream of revenue. HMRC guidance sets out that bingo promoters must pay 10% of their bingo promotion profits – receipts from participation fees and stakes minus winnings – for each accounting period, forming part of the wider tax rules for bingo halls UK. This applies only to in‑person bingo; remote or online gaming is taxed under separate regimes. The persistence of the 10 percent rate stands out when compared with the shift towards taxing remote gambling. Remote gaming duty, introduced at 15% in 2007, will jump from 21% to 40% from April 2026, while a new 25% rate for remote betting arrives in 2027.

Autumn Budget 2025: no change today, abolition tomorrow

The government’s consultation on remote gambling concluded that the duty system needed modernisation but should be differentiated between high-risk and low-risk activities. The summary of responses emphasised that bingo is a “lower risk gambling activity that supports communities across the UK”. As a result, ministers decided to preserve the duty unchanged for 2025/26 and abolish it entirely from 1 April 2026. The same policy paper notes that repealing bingo duty will simplify the system by removing one of seven gambling duties.

This decision sits alongside a significant tax hike for online gambling. By raising remote gaming duty to 40% and introducing a remote betting duty of 25%, the Treasury aims to extract revenue from sectors with lower overheads and higher perceived harm. Bingo halls, with their physical premises and local employment, are spared this increase. Maintaining the 10% duty for another year ensures continuity for operators and prevents a cliff‑edge reduction in receipts before the duty’s abolition.

What the status quo means for bingo operators under bingo duty UK

For UK bingo promoters, the immediate message is: keep paying the duty until 31 March 2026. HMRC’s excise notice requires promoters to calculate bingo receipts, deduct winnings, and remit 10% of the resulting profits under bingo duty UK. Returns must continue to be filed on the usual schedule, and operators should keep detailed records of receipts and payouts. Small‑scale bingo at travelling fairs or in societies remains exempt, but commercial halls and clubs are not.

As the abolition approaches, there are practical points to consider:

  • Final duty return – the last duty accounting period before 1 April 2026 will need a final return. Ensure systems can separate periods before and after abolition.
  • Cash flow planning – freed‑up cash from the removal of duty could support refurbishment, marketing or staff training. Preparing a budget now helps maximise the benefit.
  • Remote operations – online bingo sites may be taxed as remote gaming; under the new rules, remote gaming duty at 40% could apply. Operators offering both in‑person and online games should review their product mix and corporate structures.
  • Compliance with other duties – bingo halls often operate gaming machines that are subject to machine games duty, which forms part of wider bingo halls tax compliance UK obligations. Abolition of bingo duty does not affect these obligations.

Beyond bingo: a wider gamble on tax policy

The differentiation between land‑based bingo and remote gambling illustrates a broader shift. The government’s consultation response stresses that remote gambling has grown by over 60% since 2015/16 while land‑based gambling has declined. By targeting online gaming, ministers hope to discourage harmful behaviour and harness revenue from a growing digital sector. Abolishing bingo duty, on the other hand, signals support for leisure activities that encourage face‑to‑face socialising. Businesses in the broader leisure and hospitality sector should note this policy trajectory: low‑harm, community‑based activities may find a friend in future Budgets, while digital or high‑risk operations face tougher tax regimes.

How Apex Accountants & Tax Advisors can help

Navigating the end of bingo duty requires more than simply waiting for 1 April 2026. Our specialist tax team can assist with:

  • Compliance reviews – supporting strong bingo halls tax compliance UK by ensuring accounting systems accurately calculate bingo promotion profits and file final duty returns.
  • Cash‑flow and investment planning – projecting the financial impact of duty abolition and modelling how to reinvest savings.
  • Classification advice – determining whether online bingo products fall under remote gaming or betting duties and optimising your business structure accordingly.
  • Indirect tax strategy – assessing exposure to machine games duty, VAT and other indirect taxes to avoid surprises.

With decades of experience advising leisure and hospitality businesses, Apex Accountants can offer tailored support through this transition. Contact us today to arrange a consultation.

Frequently asked questions

What is the current rate of bingo tax?

The duty on in‑person bingo remains at 10% of bingo promotion profits. The rate has been unchanged since June 2014.

When will the bingo duty change?

The Finance Bill 2025‑26 repeals bingo duty from 1 April 2026. Operators must continue to file and pay the 10 per cent duty until then under the current tax rules for bingo halls UK.

Who has to pay bingo duty?

Any bingo promoter running commercial games on licensed premises must register and pay bingo duty. Small-scale bingo organised by societies, travelling fairs, or at home remains exempt.

How do I calculate bingo duty?

Any bingo promoter running commercial games in licensed premises must register and pay bingo duty. Small-scale bingo organised by societies, travelling fairs, or at home remains exempt.

How do I calculate bingo duty?

HMRC requires promoters to add up bingo receipts (participation fees and stakes), deduct winnings, and apply the 10 per cent rate to the resulting profit. Detailed records must be kept.

What happens to online bingo under the new regime?

Online or remote bingo may fall within remote gaming duty, which will increase to 40% from April 2026. Businesses offering remote games should seek advice to ensure correct classification and compliance.

Does the abolition of the bingo duty affect any other gambling taxes?

No. Machine game duty, gaming duty at casinos, and general betting duty remain in force. Remote gaming and betting duties will rise sharply, while land‑based betting duty stays at 15 per cent.

HMRC Investigations Into Big Businesses Now Last Years — And Companies Are Feeling the Pressure

HMRC investigations into big businesses have become markedly longer, with many major corporate tax enquiries now stretching across several years. Freedom of Information data analysed by law firm Pinsent Masons shows that open enquiries handled by HM Revenue & Customs’ Large Business Directorate now last about 41 months – nearly three and a half years. The same analysis found that the number of active investigations into companies with annual revenue above £200 million rose from 2,031 to 2,149 in the year to March 2025. HMRC’s scrutiny of large corporations is therefore both broader and deeper, and HMRC investigations into large UK companies now have consequences for business planning, cash flow and the wider UK economy.

What the data reveal about HMRC investigations into big businesses

  • HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) does not publish full data on all large-business enquiries, making precise timelines difficult to determine.
  • The most reliable indicators come from transfer pricing and diverted profits tax cases, which tend to be the most complex.
  • These cases often involve multinational companies and cross-border transactions, making them slower and more resource-intensive.

Recent statistics (2024–25)

MetricLatest figurePrevious year
Average age of settled transfer pricing enquiries41.0 months33.1 months
Number of cases settled143128

HM Revenue and Customs acknowledges that long-running enquiries can create uncertainty for businesses, but says there has been clear progress in reducing the time it takes to close cases recently. It also says that speed won’t sacrifice the correct tax amount. The broader picture reflects a mixed trend: while closed cases are now being resolved more quickly, many open enquiries continue to run for several years. Despite improvements in efficiency, the volume and complexity of cases prolongs the overall timeline for large-business tax investigations.

Why these investigations take so long

Several structural factors explain why HMRC investigations into large businesses often stretch over several years.

Complex international tax structures

Many enquiries involve multinational groups with complex cross-border arrangements. Transfer pricing disputes, questions around permanent establishments, or the use of overseas subsidiaries require detailed analysis of global transactions. These cases frequently involve cooperation between multiple tax authorities and extensive documentation reviews. As a result, investigations can take considerable time to resolve.

Governance and oversight within HMRC

Large-business tax cases are subject to strict internal oversight. HMRC has adopted a cautious approach following past criticism over corporate tax settlements. Major decisions must pass through several levels of review to ensure they are robust and defensible. While this strengthens accountability, it can slow the pace at which disputes move towards resolution.

A growing compliance workload

The number of enquiries opened into large companies has increased in recent years, reflecting a wider rise in HMRC investigations into large UK companies. HMRC continues to prioritise large-business compliance because these companies account for a substantial share of UK tax revenues. As the volume and complexity of cases rise, investigations naturally take longer to progress through the system.

The nature of corporate tax disputes

Large corporate tax enquiries often evolve into detailed technical disagreements, particularly in complex HMRC tax enquiries for large UK businesses. Companies may challenge HMRC’s interpretation of tax rules, provide additional evidence, or seek clarification through negotiation. This process can involve multiple rounds of correspondence, expert analysis, and sometimes international consultations before both sides reach agreement.

Co-operative compliance challenges

HMRC assigns a Customer Compliance Manager to major groups to maintain ongoing dialogue. In practice, however, differences in interpretation or gaps in documentation can still lead to prolonged discussions. When disagreements arise, reaching a settlement may take significant time, particularly if both parties need to revisit earlier positions.

Business impact

Prolonged investigations carry several consequences for large companies:

  • Financial uncertainty: Pending enquiries often involve substantial tax liabilities. HMRC charges late-payment interest on any underpaid tax, currently 7.75%, meaning that protracted cases can significantly increase costs. Businesses may also need to provision for contingent liabilities in their accounts, affecting reported profits and dividend decisions.
  • Resource diversion: HMRC tax enquiries for large UK businesses demand significant management time, professional fees and administrative support. According to Pinsent Masons, many of the UK’s largest firms have multiple concurrent enquiries, compounding the burden.
  • Reputational and operational risk: Unresolved tax disputes can create uncertainty for investors and may hinder a company’s ability to bid for government contracts or complete corporate transactions. Uncertainty also discourages long‑term investment decisions, undermining the UK’s competitiveness.

HMRC’s response and the policy landscape

HMRC argues that it is making progress in reducing the time taken to close enquiries and that its co‑operative compliance model remains a cornerstone of large‑business tax administration. The NAO report praises the hands‑on approach for doubling the compliance yield and reducing the long‑term tax gap. However, the public debate is shifting towards transparency and accountability. The Public Accounts Committee has launched an inquiry into tax compliance by large businesses, scrutinising how HMRC manages its caseload and whether current governance structures strike the right balance between efficiency and fairness.

The government’s 2021 Review of tax administration for large businesses recognised that timeliness is a key concern and committed to further embedding co‑operative compliance. Meanwhile, HMRC’s transfer‑pricing statistics show that staffing levels for international tax remain relatively static at 392 full‑time equivalent specialists. Unless resources increase in line with caseloads, the average age of enquiries may continue to creep upwards.

Practical steps for large businesses

While companies cannot control HMRC’s internal processes, they can take steps to reduce the risk of drawn‑out disputes:

  • Strengthen tax governance: Boards should ensure that tax policies are documented, risks are identified and escalated, and there is clear oversight from the finance and audit committees. A robust governance framework helps resolve issues quickly when HMRC asks questions.
  • Engage early with HMRC: Proactive disclosure through real‑time working or the Profit Diversion Compliance Facility can pre‑empt formal investigations and demonstrate a willingness to co‑operate.
  • Maintain thorough documentation: transfer pricing positions, transaction analyses, and internal policies should be well-evidenced and updated. Poor documentation is a common cause of delays. Detailed records also facilitate the negotiation of advance pricing agreements, which provide certainty but still take around 44 months to agree.
  • Monitor emerging policy: The Large Business Directorate’s success means HMRC is considering extending the close‑contact approach to other complex or high‑risk businesses. Medium‑sized groups should prepare for similar scrutiny.
  • Seek professional advice: Specialist advisers can help interpret HMRC correspondence, gather evidence, and negotiate settlements. Early intervention often reduces the lifespan of enquiries.

How Apex Accountants & Tax Advisors can assist

Navigating an HMRC investigation is both a technical and a strategic challenge. Apex Accountants & Tax Advisors support large businesses at every stage of the process. Our services include:

  • Risk assessments and governance reviews: Evaluating existing tax controls against HMRC expectations and best practice to identify potential triggers for enquiry.
  • Documentation and transfer‑pricing support: Preparing robust transfer‑pricing reports and documentation that stand up to HMRC scrutiny and align with international guidelines.
  • Dispute management: Representing clients in correspondence and meetings with HMRC, helping to narrow issues and achieve timely resolution. Where appropriate, we can assist with Advance Pricing Agreements or mutual agreement procedures to secure certainty.
  • Strategic advice on co‑operative compliance: Advising on whether to join HMRC’s Profit Diversion Compliance Facility or other disclosure programmes, balancing transparency with commercial considerations.
  • Training and ongoing compliance: Providing training for finance teams on record‑keeping, risk management and responding to HMRC queries. We can help design procedures to monitor tax positions across the group.

For tailored support and to minimise the impact of long‑running HMRC enquiries on your business, contact Apex Accountants today to arrange a confidential consultation.

FAQs

What is the average duration of an HMRC investigation into large businesses?
Recent FOI data indicate that open investigations into the UK’s largest companies last around 41 months (about three and a half years). HMRC’s own statistics show that the average age of settled transfer‑pricing enquiries is also around 41 months.

Why do HMRC investigations take so long?
The main drivers are the complexity of international transactions, limited specialist resources, layered governance processes and the sheer volume of cases. Transfer‑pricing disputes require coordination with other tax authorities and often take years to resolve.

How many large‑business investigations are open?
Data from HMRC’s Large Business Directorate show that there were 2,149 open investigations at the end of the 2024‑25 year, up from 2,031 a year earlier.

Does HMRC publish data on investigation length?
HMRC publishes limited statistics. The Transfer Pricing and Diverted Profits Tax statistics report includes the average age of settled enquiries. FOI responses obtained by Pinsent Masons provide further insight into the average age of open enquiries.

How can businesses reduce the duration of an HMRC enquiry?
Companies can reduce delays by keeping comprehensive documentation, engaging proactively with HMRC through their Customer Compliance Manager, addressing queries promptly and considering advance pricing agreements for complex transfer‑pricing issues. Professional advice can help streamline the process and avoid pitfalls.

Could HMRC’s close‑contact model be extended beyond large businesses?
Yes. The NAO reports that HMRC is exploring whether to apply the Large Business Directorate’s hands‑on approach to other complex or high‑risk businesses. Medium‑sized groups should monitor developments and prepare for increased engagement with HMRC.

The Government Launches Fraud Strategy 2026-2029: A Comprehensive Approach to Tackling Fraud in the UK

On 9th March 2026, the UK government, led by The Rt Hon Lord Hanson of Flint, the Home Office Minister of State, introduced the Fraud Strategy 2026-2029. This strategy aims to address the growing threat of fraud, which has become the most common crime in the UK. It accounts for 45% of all crime. The UK government is taking significant steps to tackle this issue head-on, investing £250 million over the next three years.

Why the Government Introduced the Fraud Strategy

Fraud has become a critical challenge, affecting millions of individuals and businesses across the UK. In 2025 alone, there were 4.15 million incidents of fraud. Criminals are using increasingly sophisticated methods, such as AI, deepfakes, and social engineering, to exploit victims. These scams are not only financially devastating but also erode public trust, harm businesses, and undermine economic stability.

Recognising the urgent need for action, the government introduced the Fraud Strategy 2026-2029 to strengthen the UK’s response to fraud, protect vulnerable groups, and ensure a safer digital economy. This strategy focuses on three main pillars: Disrupt, Safeguard, and Respond, each targeting a different aspect of prevention and victim support.

The Three-Pillar Approach of the New Fraud Strategy

1. Disrupt: Preventing Fraud at its Source

The first pillar of the strategy, Disrupt, is focused on making it harder for criminals to commit fraud. The government is strengthening fraud prevention measures by closing gaps that criminals exploit. Also denying them access to the tools and methods they use to operate.

Key Initiatives:

  • Online Crime Centre (OCC): Launching in 2026, the OCC will be a public-private partnership that will centralise data sharing and intelligence gathering. It will identify and disrupt fraud trends in real-time. This collaboration aims to tackle fraud across telecommunications, financial services, and online platforms.
  • International Collaboration: The UK is partnering with Nigeria, Vietnam, and other countries to tackle cross-border fraud and dismantle global fraud networks.
  • Strengthened Regulations for Technology and Financial Services: The government is introducing new measures to address fraud in telecommunications, online platforms, and cryptoassets.

2. Safeguard: Protecting Individuals and Businesses

The Safeguard pillar aims to reduce vulnerability and build resilience to fraud. By educating the public and businesses, particularly those most at risk, the government seeks to prevent fraud before it happens.

Key Initiatives:

  • Public Education Campaigns: The Stop! Think Fraud campaign will be expanded to raise awareness about fraud, targeting both individuals and businesses. The campaign will work closely with schools, universities, and vulnerable communities to improve fraud literacy.
  • Cyber Resilience for Businesses: With small businesses being frequent targets of fraud, the government will provide cybersecurity support and encourage businesses to adopt best practices for data protection and fraud prevention.
  • Protection for Vulnerable Groups: The strategy focuses on elderly people, young adults, and those in financial distress, ensuring they are more informed and less vulnerable to scams.

3. Respond: Supporting Victims and Delivering Justice

The third pillar, Respond, is focused on supporting fraud victims and ensuring that fraudsters are held accountable. This includes improving reporting systems, providing victim support, and reforming fraud laws to keep pace with modern fraud tactics.

Key Initiatives:

  • Fraud Victims Charter: This new initiative will establish national standards for victim care. It will ensure that fraud victims receive timely responses, emotional support, and financial reimbursement where applicable.
  • Report Fraud Service: The Report Fraud Service will offer a streamlined and secure way for victims to report incidents. This will enable law enforcement to take swift action and gather intelligence for future cases.
  • Fraud Law Reforms: An independent review of fraud laws will ensure that current legal frameworks are fit for purpose in addressing new fraud methods. It will enable victims to receive justice in a timely manner.

Sectors Focused by the Fraud Strategy

The Fraud Strategy 2026-2029 targets sectors that are particularly vulnerable to fraud due to their reliance on digital platforms, financial transactions, and large data flows. The key sectors being focused on are:

  1. Telecommunications: Preventing fraud via mobile phones and communication platforms. As these platforms are often exploited by fraudsters for phishing and other fraudulent activities.
  2. Financial Services: Addressing both unauthorised fraud and authorised fraud (such as APP fraud), and regulating emerging threats from cryptoassets and digital currencies.
  3. Cybersecurity: Strengthening resilience against cybercrime, with particular focus on small businesses that are often targeted by fraudsters.
  4. Online Platforms: Tackling fraud on social media, marketplaces, and advertising platforms. Fraudsters exploit these spaces to reach a large number of victims.

Our Viewpoint on the Government’s Fraud Strategy

At Apex Accountants, we fully support the Fraud Strategy 2026-2029 and its multifaceted approach to combatting fraud. We recognise that the growing sophistication of fraud requires a collaborative effort from the government, law enforcement, the private sector, and industry stakeholders. This strategy’s focus on prevention, education, and resilience is essential for reducing the impact of fraud across the UK.

In particular, we are encouraged by the government’s emphasis on cybersecurity and small business support, which aligns with our own efforts to help businesses strengthen their fraud risk management and cyber resilience. As fraud continues to evolve, so must our response, and this strategy sets the foundation for a more secure future in which fraud is actively disrupted before it can cause harm.

While the Disrupt pillar focuses on shutting down the avenues criminals use, the Safeguard and Respond pillars are equally important. Educating individuals and businesses to recognise fraud and providing timely support to victims is crucial. It helps reduce both the financial and emotional toll fraud takes. We welcome the initiative to provide a Fraud Victims Charter, ensuring that victims receive the justice and support they need.

Conclusion

The government’s launch of the Fraud Strategy marks a significant step in the fight against fraud. This strategy promises a coordinated effort to tackle fraud at its source, protect vulnerable individuals and businesses, and support victims in their recovery. Apex Accountants stands ready to help businesses navigate these changes and protect themselves from the increasing threat of fraud. We are committed to supporting your business every step of the way in tackling fraud and ensuring a secure future.

FAQs on Fraud and New Fraud Strategy 

1. What are the 7 types of fraud?

The seven types of fraud typically include financial fraud, identity theft, credit card fraud, insurance fraud, mortgage fraud, tax fraud, and cyber fraud. Each involves deception for personal gain.

2. What are the 4 components of a fraud management strategy?

A fraud management strategy typically includes prevention, detection, response, and investigation. These components help businesses identify, manage, and mitigate fraud risks effectively through a structured approach.

3. What are the 4 P’s of fraud?

The 4 P’s of fraud are: Prevention, Pursuit, Protection, and Prosecution. These elements aim to stop fraud before it occurs, catch offenders, protect victims, and ensure offenders face legal consequences.

4. What does a fraud strategist do?

A fraud strategist develops and implements policies and systems to prevent, detect, and respond to fraud. They analyse risks, identify vulnerabilities, and create strategies to safeguard businesses and individuals from fraudulent activities.

UKDI Fast-Paced Innovation Competition Enters New Phase with Fresh Defence Funding

The UKDI fast-paced innovation competition has entered a new phase after the UK Ministry of Defence’s innovation unit, UK Defence Innovation (UKDI), announced fresh funding rounds aimed at accelerating defence and security technology development across the United Kingdom. The programme opened its latest competition phase in early 2026, inviting companies, universities and research organisations to submit proposals that address emerging defence challenges. The initiative operates through rapid funding calls designed to move ideas from concept to testing quickly, supporting technologies that strengthen national security and defence capability.

The competition is administered through the UK Government’s defence innovation framework and aims to encourage collaboration between the private sector, academia and defence agencies. Successful applicants may receive government-backed funding to develop prototypes, conduct feasibility studies and demonstrate practical applications.

Why this matters

Innovation programmes linked to defence spending often influence wider sectors of the economy. Funding competitions from government bodies can create opportunities for technology companies, research institutions and specialist manufacturers.

The new phase of the UKDI fast-paced innovation competition signals continued government investment in emerging technologies, particularly those that can be deployed rapidly. For UK businesses operating in engineering, data science, cybersecurity, robotics and advanced manufacturing, the programme represents a potential source of research funding and commercial partnership.

Key points

  • The UK Defence Innovation unit has launched a new phase of the UKDI fast paced innovation competition.
  • The programme funds rapid development of defence and security technologies.
  • UK companies, research institutions and universities can submit proposals.
  • Projects may receive government funding to test prototypes and new concepts.
  • The scheme supports collaboration between industry and the Ministry of Defence.

What Has Happened

The Ministry of Defence has opened a new round of submissions under the UKDI Fast-Paced Innovation Competition, a programme designed to identify and support innovative technologies that could strengthen UK defence capabilities.

The competition typically operates through short application windows. Proposals are assessed quickly, with selected projects receiving funding to move from concept to demonstration within a relatively short timeframe.

The objective is to reduce the gap between research and operational use, allowing defence agencies to evaluate new solutions more rapidly than traditional procurement processes allow.

Government-backed innovation programmes often focus on emerging areas such as:

  • Artificial intelligence and data analysis
  • Autonomous systems and robotics
  • Advanced sensing technologies
  • Cybersecurity tools
  • Resilient communications infrastructure

Background and Context

UK defence innovation programmes have expanded over the past decade as governments attempt to accelerate technology development and maintain strategic advantage.

The Ministry of Defence has used a number of mechanisms to support innovation, including the Defence and Security Accelerator (DASA) and other targeted funding competitions. These programmes provide grants or contracts to organisations developing technologies that could support defence operations or national security.

The fast-paced competition model reflects a shift in procurement strategy. Traditional defence procurement often involves lengthy development cycles. Rapid competitions aim to identify promising technologies earlier and test them quickly.

Government innovation funding also supports the UK’s broader industrial strategy. By funding research and development projects, the government encourages collaboration between private companies, universities and defence agencies.

Key Details and Changes

Although competition themes may vary by round, the structure typically includes:

  • Open calls inviting proposals from UK businesses and research organisations
  • Short application windows designed to speed up evaluation
  • Funding for feasibility studies, prototype development or testing
  • Collaboration between technology developers and defence stakeholders

Projects selected through the programme may move forward to further development stages if early testing proves successful.

Who Is Affected

The UKDI fast-paced innovation competition is relevant to several sectors:

  • Technology startups working in defence-related innovation
  • Advanced engineering firms
  • Cybersecurity companies
  • Universities and research laboratories
  • Data analytics and AI developers

Small and medium-sized enterprises often benefit from such competitions because they provide access to funding and defence-sector partnerships that might otherwise be difficult to secure.

However, participation also requires careful planning around intellectual property, compliance with government contracting rules and financial reporting requirements.

Apex Accountants Insight

Government innovation competitions can provide valuable funding and strategic partnerships for technology businesses. Yet they also introduce operational and financial considerations.

Projects supported by public funding may require:

  • Formal project accounting and reporting
  • Grant compliance documentation
  • VAT treatment assessments where funding is linked to deliverables
  • R&D tax relief analysis where applicable

Businesses receiving innovation funding should review how the funding is structured. Some grants may qualify for specific tax treatment, while others could influence eligibility for relief schemes such as R&D tax credits.

Strong financial oversight is essential during innovation projects. Research programmes often involve staged funding and milestone payments, which require careful accounting.

Why This Matters for UK Businesses

Innovation competitions linked to defence spending can influence the wider technology ecosystem.

Potential impacts include:

  • Increased research funding for technology firms
  • New collaboration opportunities between industry and government
  • Faster development cycles for emerging technologies
  • Growth opportunities for defence-related startups

However, businesses must also consider compliance requirements tied to government funding. Financial reporting, grant conditions and intellectual property arrangements can create administrative complexity.

What Businesses Should Do

Companies considering participation in innovation competitions should:

  • Review eligibility requirements before applying
  • Assess financial reporting obligations linked to grant funding
  • Evaluate intellectual property implications of government partnerships
  • Consider tax treatment of funding and development costs
  • Maintain clear project accounting records

Professional financial advice can help businesses manage these obligations effectively.

How We Can Help

Businesses participating in the UKDI fast-paced innovation competition may face complex financial, tax and reporting requirements. Innovation funding can affect accounting treatment, VAT obligations and eligibility for R&D tax relief.

Apex Accountants & Tax Advisors supports companies involved in research and innovation projects across the UK. Our services include:

  • Accounting support for grant-funded projects
  • R&D tax relief reviews and claims
  • Financial reporting for government-funded programmes
  • VAT treatment of innovation grants
  • Strategic financial planning for technology businesses

Need guidance on innovation funding or R&D tax relief? Contact Apex Accountants today.

Conclusion

The latest phase of the UKDI fast-paced innovation competition highlights the UK government’s continued focus on accelerating defence-related technological development. By providing funding and rapid evaluation processes, the programme encourages collaboration between industry, academia and government.

For businesses operating in advanced technology sectors, the competition may offer opportunities for funding and partnership. Careful financial management and compliance planning remain essential for organisations seeking to benefit from government-backed innovation programmes.

UK Economy in 2026: Retail Sales Rise, Exports Strengthen and Public Finances Record Surplus

The UK economy in 2026 is stronger than many expected. Retail sales rose sharply in January. Export demand improved. The Government recorded a significant monthly surplus in public finances.

At the same time, unemployment remains elevated in certain regions. Business tax pressures are still present. Growth forecasts remain modest.

So what is really happening? And what should businesses do now?

At Apex Accountants, we look beyond headlines. Below, we break down the facts, explain the drivers, and outline practical actions for UK businesses.

Snapshot: What the latest data shows

Here is a summary of the key figures reported for early 2026:

IndicatorLatest FigureWhat It Means
Retail sales growth (January)+1.8%Strongest monthly rise in over a year
December retail growth+0.4%Shows upward momentum
UK Composite PMI (February)53.9Activity expanding (above 50)
Public sector surplus (January)£30.4bnHighest January surplus on record
Self-assessment receipts£29.4bn£3.6bn higher than previous year
London unemployment rate7.6%Above national average (5.2%)

The numbers show economic momentum in spending and exports. However, the labour market remains under pressure in some areas.

Retail sales rebound: What it means for businesses

Retail volumes rose by 1.8% in January. This is significant. It suggests consumers returned to spending after a cautious end to 2025.

Why spending increased

Several factors contributed:

  • Post-holiday promotions and discounting
  • Slight easing in inflation pressures
  • Wage growth stabilising real income
  • Increased online purchasing

Non-store retail activity performed strongly. Jewellery and discretionary goods saw notable demand.

What this means for business owners

Retail growth can improve cash flow in the short term. However, this does not mean consumer confidence is fully restored.

Businesses should:

  • Monitor sales trends monthly
  • Review stock management carefully
  • Avoid over-expansion based on one strong month
  • Maintain tight cost control

Spending is improving. But it remains selective.

Exports and private sector growth: A positive signal

The UK composite PMI reading of 53.9 indicates expansion. Any reading above 50 shows growth.

Export orders increased at the fastest pace since 2021. This supports manufacturers and internationally focused businesses.

What is driving export growth?

  • Improved global demand conditions
  • Competitive pricing from sterling movements
  • Services sector resilience

The services sector remains the largest driver of UK economic activity. Hospitality, finance, healthcare and leisure contributed to growth.

Strategic takeaway

If your business trades internationally:

  • Review export pricing structures
  • Consider currency exposure management
  • Assess new market opportunities

Export demand recovery can provide growth opportunities. However, global conditions remain uncertain.

Public finances surplus explained

January recorded a £30.4 billion public sector surplus. This means government receipts exceeded spending for the month.

This was largely due to:

  • Strong self-assessment tax receipts
  • Income tax threshold freezes
  • Lower debt interest payments

Self-assessment receipts reached £29.4 billion. This was significantly higher than the previous year.

Why this matters for taxpayers

A surplus does not mean tax cuts are imminent. In fact:

  • Income tax thresholds remain frozen
  • Fiscal headroom is still tight
  • Government borrowing levels remain historically high

Businesses and individuals should not assume immediate tax relief.

Labour market concerns: A key risk factor

While spending and exports improved, employment data presents challenges.

London’s unemployment rate has risen to 7.6%. Youth unemployment stands significantly higher.

Sectors affected include:

  • Hospitality
  • Retail
  • Entry-level services

This creates a mixed economic environment. Strong spending data does not remove labour market pressures.

Practical actions for business owners

Economic data provides direction. But strategy matters more. Here is what we advise clients at Apex Accountants:

Cash flow first

  • Review cash flow forecasts monthly
  • Build contingency reserves
  • Plan for tax liabilities early

Tax planning

  • Assess self-assessment and corporation tax exposure
  • Use available reliefs properly
  • Review dividend strategy

Cost control

  • Audit fixed costs
  • Renegotiate supplier contracts
  • Monitor payroll growth carefully

Growth decisions

  • Avoid reacting to one month’s data
  • Base expansion on sustainable revenue
  • Stress-test projections

Short-term improvement does not remove long-term risks.

Sector outlook summary

SectorCurrent OutlookRisk Level
RetailImproving but cautiousMedium
HospitalityDemand rising, labour pressureMedium–High
ManufacturingExport boost positiveMedium
Professional servicesStableLow–Medium
SMEs overallGrowth modestMedium

This environment rewards careful planning. Overconfidence can create problems.

How We Help Businesses in UK

At Apex Accountants, we support businesses through economic shifts with practical financial guidance.

Our services include:

  • Corporation tax planning
  • Self-assessment tax advice
  • VAT compliance and strategy
  • Management reporting
  • Cash flow forecasting
  • Virtual CFO services
  • Business growth strategy
  • Budgeting and forecasting

We focus on clarity, reduce risk, and help you make informed decisions.

Economic data changes every month. Strong financial structure protects your business in both good and challenging periods.

Conclusion

Early 2026 has started with encouraging signals. Retail spending has improved. Export demand has strengthened. Public finances showed a strong January surplus.

However, unemployment pressures remain. Growth forecasts are still modest. Tax burdens remain elevated.

The UK economy is stabilising. It is not booming.

For business owners, the message is clear:

  • Stay disciplined
  • Plan ahead
  • Monitor cash closely
  • Optimise your tax position

Economic momentum can support opportunity. But financial control determines long-term success.

If you would like tailored advice on how current economic conditions affect your business, contact Apex Accountants today and book a consultation.

FAQs About UK Economy in 2026

Based on current UK search trends and client discussions, common questions include:

1. Is the UK economy recovering in 2026?

There are signs of short-term improvement. Retail and exports are stronger. However, growth is expected to remain modest overall.

2. Will taxes increase again?

There are no confirmed new increases at present. However, threshold freezes continue to increase effective tax burdens.

3. Should businesses expand now?

Expansion decisions should be based on cash flow strength and sector-specific performance. Caution remains important.

4. Is inflation still a risk?

Inflation has eased from peak levels. However, cost pressures remain for energy, wages and supply chains.

Book a Free Consultation