How to Complete CT600P Form for Creative Tax Relief Claims 

We are increasingly asked the same question by production companies and arts organisations: why does a claim that looked routine last year now need another corporation tax schedule? The short answer is that HMRC introduced the CT600P form for creative sector tax relief claims in April 2026 and from returns submitted on or after 6 April 2026. It must now accompany creative industries’ relief and expenditure credit claims made on a CT600. HMRC also moved the expenditure-credit redemption detail into CT600P, so this is not a cosmetic extra page; it is now part of what makes many claims complete and processable. 

Quick answer

  • CT600P is HMRC’s new creative industries supplementary page for corporation tax claims, covering AVEC, VGEC, the legacy film, TV and video game reliefs, and the cultural reliefs for theatre, orchestras, museums, and galleries. 
  • If you submit a creative industries claim on or after 6 April 2026, you generally need to file CT600P with the CT600 at the same time, including for amended claims
  • CT600P does not replace the additional information form. The additional information form is still mandatory and must be sent before or on the same day as the CT600; otherwise, HMRC can treat the claim as invalid and amend the return to remove it. 
  • The biggest practical risks are missing the claim deadline, mismatching dates between the CT600 and the additional information form, omitting BFI certification or cost breakdowns, and forgetting that CT600P can cover only 12 months at a time

What is the CT600P form for creative sector tax relief claims?

CT600P is HMRC’s new supplementary page for creative industries claims made as part of a Company Tax Return. HMRC published the form on 6 April 2026, and the current form is CT600P (2026) Version 3. It is designed to capture the figures for creative reliefs and expenditure credits, including the redemption steps for AVEC and VGEC that determine how much is set against tax, surrendered in a group, or paid out. 

In practice, the form does three jobs. It records the expenditure and credit figures for AVEC and VGEC; it carries out the step-by-step redemption calculation for those credits; and it also provides the Corporation Tax supplementary reporting for the older audiovisual and video games reliefs plus the cultural reliefs. That matters because CT600P is not limited to new-style credits: it also reaches legacy claims still alive in the transitional period. 

It is important to note here that CT600P is not just an AVEC/VGEC form. It is a single creative-industries schedule that now sits across film, television, video games, theatre, orchestra, and museums and galleries’ claims. 

Who now has to file the new supplementary page CT600P?

Any company submitting a return on or after 6 April 2026 for a creative industries relief or expenditure credit claim should complete CT600P unless HMRC’s current guidance states otherwise.

HMRC’s public guidance says the requirement applies to creative industry claims submitted on or after that date, and HMRC’s online service guidance confirms it applies to both new and amended claims

The claims in scope are set out in HMRC’s CT600P guidance and creative industries guidance.

SituationIs CT600P needed?Why it matters
New AVEC claimYesCT600P carries the expenditure figures and credit redemption steps
New VGEC claimYesCT600P carries the expenditure figures and credit redemption steps
New legacy film, TV or video games relief claimYesCT600P still covers predecessor reliefs during transition
New theatre, orchestra, museum or gallery claimYesCT600P also covers cultural reliefs
Amended creative industries claimYesHMRC says the requirement applies to amended claims too
Company receiving surrendered AVEC/VGEC from a group companyOften yesCT600P can be used even if the recipient is not making its own creative claim, and CT600 box 614 may also be relevant

** The table above reflects HMRC’s current guidance on CT600P scope and on group-surrendered AVEC/VGEC amounts. 

One overlooked edge case is group relief for expenditure credits. HMRC’s CT600P guidance says a company can include amounts surrendered from other group companies even where it is not itself claiming a creative tax relief in that return. If you decide not to include some surrendered amounts in CT600P, HMRC still expects the surrendering company details to appear in the computations. 

Read: How Creative Industry Tax Reliefs Can Reduce Your Corporation Tax Bill

Which claims and headline rates does CT600P cover in 2026?

CT600P covers both the new expenditure-credit regimes and the reliefs that still survive in the transitional window. For audiovisual and video games, the tax system is now centred on AVEC and VGEC, with legacy film, television, animation and video games reliefs closing to new productions after 31 March 2025 and closing fully from 1 April 2027

Claim typeCurrent headline rateImportant transitional point
AVEC for most films and high-end TV34%Available on qualifying expenditure incurred from 1 January 2024
AVEC for children’s TV and animation39%Applies to animated films and animated TV programmes, plus children’s TV
AVEC for certified independent films53%Higher rate claimable from 1 April 2025 on costs incurred from 1 April 2024, with a £15 million core-cost cap
Additional AVEC for relevant VFX costs39%Available from 1 April 2025 for qualifying UK VFX costs incurred from 1 January 2025; outside the usual 80% cap
VGEC34%Available on qualifying video game expenditure incurred from 1 January 2024
Legacy film, TV and video games reliefsUsually 25% payable credit on surrendered lossClosed to new productions after 31 March 2025 and close fully from 1 April 2027
Theatre, Orchestra and Museums/Galleries reliefs40% non-touring, 45% touring and orchestralPermanent rates from 1 April 2025

**The rates and dates above come from HMRC’s current AVEC, VGEC and legacy-relief guidance, plus the government’s policy papers on the permanent cultural-relief rates. 

  • Eligibility

The rule set still turns heavily on whether the claimant is the proper production company and whether the production meets the relevant certification test. 

  • AVEC

Films and TV programmes must be certified as British or qualify under a co-production treaty, and at least 10% of core costs must relate to UK activities. 

  • VGEC

The game must be British-certified, intended for supply to the general public, and at least 10% of core costs must relate to UK activities. 

What does CT600P guidance require you to enter?

CT600P guidance requires three broad categories of information: the accounting-period details, the expenditure-and-credit figures, and the cross-reference figures that feed back into the main CT600. The form starts with company details and an accounting period that cannot exceed 12 months. If the company’s period of account is longer than 12 months, you will need more than one tax return and more than one additional information form. 

AVEC and VGEC Guidance

HMRC asks for the building blocks of the calculation. That includes relevant global expenditure, the part of that expenditure that is UK expenditure, the qualifying expenditure for the period, and the credit claimed for the period. For AVEC, CT600P also has a separate box for the additional visual effects credit

For AVEC and VGEC, the form then walks through the six redemption steps. That is where many businesses slip: CT600P is not asking only what the gross credit is, but also how much is used against Corporation Tax, how much survives the notional tax charge, how much is surrendered to a group company, how much is used against other liabilities, and what is left as a payable amount. 

For legacy film, TV, video games and cultural reliefs

HMRC allows you to enter combined totals on CT600P, but your corporation tax computation should still show the calculation for each production separately. That is an important distinction. CT600P can aggregate; your supporting computations should not. 

A genuinely useful cross-check is the CT600 box mapping. HMRC’s manuals say the following CT600 boxes must line up with CT600P figures for a valid claim.

CT600P figureCT600 boxWhat it represents
P245541AVEC/VGEC used to discharge liabilities
P190886Payable AVEC/VGEC after redemption steps
P325540Legacy creatives tax credit used to discharge liabilities
P330885Payable legacy creatives tax credit
P310663Total creatives core expenditure for predecessor reliefs
P315665Total creatives additional deduction for predecessor reliefs
614AVEC/VGEC surrendered to this company by a group company
658Tick to confirm the additional information form has been completed

**HMRC’s Creative Industries Expenditure Credit Manual sets out those CT600 box links expressly. 

If you expect a payable amount, do not forget the bank details on the CT600. HMRC’s manual says payments will be made using the bank details supplied in the CT600. 

Also Read: Cross-Border VAT for Film Companies: Updated Guidance for UK Producers and Distributors

What supporting evidence must be submitted with a CT600P claim?

CT600P is only part of the filing package. Since 1 April 2024, all creative industries claims must also be backed by an online additional information form, and HMRC says that form must be submitted before, or on the same day as, the CT600. If it is late, the original claim is invalid and the return has to be amended and the claim re-submitted. 

The supporting package will usually include the following.

  • Company identifiers such as the UTR, and if applicable the VAT and PAYE references, matching the CT600. 
  • The start and end dates of the accounting period, matching the CT600 exactly. HMRC says a date mismatch can cause the additional information form to be rejected and the claim removed from the CT600. 
  • For film, TV and video games, a digital BFI certificate and the DCMS reference number on that certificate. HMRC no longer accepts the British cultural certificate as a CT600 attachment for these claims; it must now go with the additional information form. 
  • Statements of core costs, split between UK and non-UK costs, plus a breakdown of costs by category
  • Connected party transaction details where relevant. HMRC’s additional information rules and manuals specifically require connected-party information for relevant claims, and if the required connected-party information is not supplied, qualifying expenditure can be restricted. 
  • For AVEC/VGEC claims, a computation showing how the credit was calculated for each production and an expenditure breakdown separating core from non-core expenditure and UK from non-UK expenditure. 

If you are claiming the additional AVEC for visual effects, HMRC now wants more than a top-line figure. The updated additional information form asks for the amount of additional credit, vendor details, the cost incurred with each vendor, and the number of people engaged in qualifying VFX work. If there were more than 10 vendors, the excess vendor details must be attached separately. 

For theatre, orchestra, and museums and galleries, the evidence pack is slightly different. Touring claims need venue or performance detail, and HMRC’s updated process now allows full production detail for only up to 10 productions, with a summary section for the rest. 

How do AVEC and VGEC calculations work in practice?

AVEC and VGEC are calculated by reference to qualifying expenditure, and the figure is generally the lower of 80% of total core costs and the amount of UK core costs. Qualifying expenditure is calculated on a cumulative basis, which is why prior-period claims matter. 

For AVEC and VGEC, the gross credit is taxable, and CT600P then takes you through the statutory redemption steps. First, it is used against Corporation Tax; then the notional tax charge is worked through; then any balance may be used against other Corporation Tax liabilities, surrendered to group companies, used for other company liabilities, or paid as a cash credit if an amount remains. That is why the gross credit on the production is not automatically the cash you receive. 

A worked example makes the point. HMRC’s own example for AW Games Ltd shows a video game with £40 million of core expenditure, of which £30 million is UK expenditure. The qualifying expenditure is £30 million, because that is lower than 80% of total core costs; at 34%, the gross VGEC is £10.2 million. HMRC then notes that the payable amount depends on the company’s wider tax position and the redemption steps, not just the headline rate. 

HMRC’s AW Games exampleAmount
Core expenditure£40 million
UK core expenditure£30 million
80% of total core expenditure£32 million
Qualifying expenditure£30 million
VGEC rate34%
Gross expenditure credit£10.2 million

The figures above come directly from HMRC’s worked example. 

Two exceptions deserve separate attention. 

First, independent films can claim AVEC at 53%, but only on up to £15 million of core costs, and only where the film meets the BFI low-budget certification rules. 

Second, qualifying VFX costs for non-animated, non-independent films and for high-end TV can attract 39% additional credit and are outside the normal 80% cap, but the extra VFX credit is only claimed in the completion period or a later period

What are the main transitional traps, deadlines and compliance risks?

The biggest filing risk is timing

HMRC says creative industries claims should normally be made within 2 years from the end of the period of account or within 42 months from the beginning of the period of account where the period is longer than 18 months. 

For older legacy audiovisual and video games relief periods, you may still encounter the older rule allowing claims up to one year after the company’s filing date, with the newer two-year rule applying to accounting periods beginning on or after 1 April 2024

That time limit interacts with filing defects in an awkward way. 

If the additional information form or mandatory evidence was not in place by the date the CT600 was filed, the claim is invalid and HMRC will amend the return to remove it. If the missing material is submitted later, the company must amend the CT600 and the date of claim becomes the date of the amendment, which can matter if the statutory deadline is already close. 

Transition is the second major trap

AVEC and VGEC became mandatory for new productions from 1 April 2025 and become mandatory for all productions from 1 April 2027. Legacy film, television and video game releases, therefore, still exist for some productions, but only inside that narrowing window. A common mistake is assuming that because a claim is filed in 2026, it must automatically be under the new regime. That is wrong; the correct regime still depends on the production’s start date and the closure rules. 

The third trap is assuming all cultural claims work on a purely UK-only basis for every open period.

 From 1 April 2025, theatre, orchestra and museums and galleries reliefs moved to 40% and 45% permanent rates, and EEA expenditure stopped qualifying. But CT600P guidance still warns that in some cultural-relief cases you may need to consider European expenditure, which reflects the fact that older periods can still sit under earlier rules. Transitional periods therefore need careful handling rather than blanket assumptions. 

A final practical point: HMRC has acknowledged a small CT600P validation issue affecting some companies. HMRC says it does not affect the validity of claims, and the online service guidance is being updated as the workaround evolves, with a service update planned for April 2027

FAQs About CT600P Claim Guidance

Can I submit CT600P without the additional information form?

No, HMRC requires companies to submit the additional information form as part of a valid creative industries claim. Companies must submit the form before or on the same day as the CT600. If they submit it late or provide incomplete information, HMRC can amend the CT600 and remove the claim.

Does CT600P apply to amended returns as well as new claims?

Yes. HMRC’s online service guidance states that companies must complete the CT600P requirement for both new and amended claims involving one or more creative reliefs or credits. This requirement also applies to businesses correcting earlier returns after 6 April 2026.

Do I need a separate CT600P for each production?

No, not necessarily. CT600P allows combined totals for multiple productions in the same category, but HMRC says your corporation tax computations should still show the figures for each production separately. In other words, the schedule can aggregate, but your support file should not. 

What if my accounting period is longer than 12 months?

CT600P can cover only one accounting period of up to 12 months. If your period of account is longer, you will normally file more than one CT600 and HMRC expects a separate additional information form for each accounting period claimed. 

Can a company file CT600P just because another group company surrendered AVEC or VGEC to it?

Potentially, yes. HMRC’s guidance says a company can include surrendered AVEC or VGEC on CT600P even if it is not itself claiming a creative relief in that return. The recipient may also need to use CT600 box 614, and the surrendering company details should still be visible in the computations. 

Do I need an accountant to complete CT600P?

The law does not require one, but the form is technical enough that professional review is often sensible, especially where the claim mixes AVEC or VGEC with legacy reliefs, includes connected-party costs, or involves group surrender or VFX uplift. The gross credit, the CT600 entries, and the payable amount are not the same figure, and that is where self-prepared claims often go wrong. 

Need help with a CT600P claim?

If your company is making its first CT600P form for creative sector tax relief claims, the sensible next step is to review the claim before filing rather than after HMRC challenges it. At Apex, we would usually look at the corporation tax service side first, then the wider tax planning service position, and where the project overlaps with innovation expenditure, we would also check the R&D tax accountant service to make sure costs are not being pushed into the wrong regime.

If you want a second review before submission, contact us today and we can look at the claim, the evidence pack, and the CT600 mapping together.

Changes to Lower Value Tax Debts: HMRC Bank Deduction Plans

A business can fall behind with a relatively modest VAT or PAYE liability after one difficult trading quarter. Because the amount is not substantial enough to trigger immediate court action, some directors assume HMRC will give it less attention.

That assumption may become increasingly dangerous. The government is consulting on a new automated process for recovering lower value tax debts through monthly deductions from UK bank and building society accounts.

The proposals are not yet law. However, they show that HMRC wants a practical enforcement tool for taxpayers who can make payments but repeatedly ignore collection letters, calls and other contact attempts.

Quick Answer

  • The proposals are currently at the consultation stage and are not confirmed law.
  • HMRC does not presently expect the measure to cover total debts above £5,000 for individuals or £10,000 for companies, although the final limits remain undecided.
  • It would apply only after HMRC’s standard collection process had been exhausted and the taxpayer had persistently failed to engage.
  • HMRC is considering a 14-day Pre-Deduction Notice before the first monthly deduction.
  • Taxpayers could object because of an HMRC error, financial hardship, additional support needs or third-party ownership of funds.

What Are Lower Value Tax Debts Under HMRC’s Proposal?

Lower value tax debts would be established HMRC liabilities that fall within proposed upper limits and remain unpaid after repeated collection attempts. The indicative limits are £5,000 for individuals and £10,000 for companies, including accrued penalties and interest at the point HMRC considers taking action.

These figures are not final thresholds. The consultation states that the upper limits have not yet been decided and seeks views on what would be proportionate.

HMRC would consider a taxpayer’s total debt across different tax regimes rather than examining each liability separately. The measure could therefore cover a combination of:

  • Self Assessment Income Tax
  • VAT
  • PAYE and National Insurance
  • Corporation Tax
  • Stamp taxes
  • Tax penalties
  • Accrued interest

For example, a company owing £2,000 in VAT and £1,500 in PAYE would have a combined tax debt of £3,500 for the proposed eligibility test. Splitting liabilities across different taxes would not prevent them from being considered together.

Read: Employing Family Members in a UK Business: Why HMRC Is Asking Tougher Payroll Questions

Why Is HMRC Targeting Smaller Tax Debts?

HMRC is targeting smaller tax debts because many remain unresolved after letters, calls and referrals to debt collection agencies. Traditional enforcement methods can also cost too much to use efficiently against modest liabilities.

Official analysis indicates that approximately 4.8 million individuals and companies hold debts within the indicative limits. These represent around 11.5 million separate debts, with a combined value of about £4 billion.

Each year, more than 750,000 lower-value debts worth over £2 billion are returned to HMRC after debt collection agencies have been unable to secure payment. HMRC believes the absence of a scalable enforcement process may encourage some taxpayers to assume that smaller liabilities will not be pursued.

HMRC already resolves more than 95% of tax debt by value each year. Its concern is the remaining population of older debts where the taxpayer has repeatedly declined to communicate.

How Would HMRC Tackle Lower Value Tax Debts?

HMRC would tackle lower value tax debts by instructing a bank or other deposit-taking institution to make fixed monthly deductions from a taxpayer’s account. The proposed process would begin only after normal collection activity and opportunities to agree a voluntary payment plan had failed.

The likely process would be:

  1. A tax liability becomes final and remains unpaid.
  2. HMRC sends reminders and attempts to contact the taxpayer.
  3. The case may be referred to a debt collection agency.
  4. HMRC confirms that standard collection routes have been exhausted.
  5. HMRC issues a formal Pre-Deduction Notice.
  6. The taxpayer receives a final opportunity to pay, arrange Time to Pay or object.
  7. If no action is taken, HMRC instructs the bank to begin monthly deductions.

The Pre-Deduction Notice would state the debt amount, penalties and interest, proposed monthly payment, deduction date and planned payment period. HMRC is considering allowing 14 days between issuing the notice and making the first deduction.

The 14-day period is only a consultation proposal. It is not yet a statutory deadline.

Which Debts and Taxpayers Would Be Within Scope?

The proposed power would cover individuals and companies with final, legally enforceable HMRC debts who have persistently failed to engage. It would not be a first response to a recently missed payment.

The following cases would be expected to fall outside the proposed process:

  • Debts subject to an active appeal
  • Liabilities under an ongoing enquiry or compliance review
  • Recent debts still within HMRC’s standard collection cycle
  • Debts covered by an agreed Time to Pay arrangement
  • Cases already subject to another enforcement arrangement
  • Taxpayers without an identifiable UK bank or building society account
  • Overseas bank accounts

A disputed liability should not qualify merely because HMRC has issued an assessment. The amount would need to be final and legally enforceable, with the normal appeal process completed or expired.

This distinction matters. A taxpayer who disagrees with an assessment must challenge the underlying liability through the correct appeal route. Ignoring collection correspondence is not an effective way to preserve appeal rights.

What Safeguards Would Apply Before Bank Deductions?

HMRC proposes safeguards covering notice, affordability, additional support needs, objections, independent review and possible tribunal oversight. Automation would be paused where the available information suggests that human judgement is required.

The proposed safeguards include:

  • More than 10 attempts to contact the taxpayer before using the power
  • A formal notice before deductions begin
  • Opportunities to disclose financial hardship or support needs
  • Manual review by trained HMRC staff
  • The right to object before or during the payment schedule
  • An independent HMRC review of an objection
  • A possible external appeal to a tribunal or court
  • Refunds and compensation for charges caused by HMRC errors

HMRC proposes allowing objections where:

  • HMRC has made a factual or procedural error
  • The deductions would cause financial hardship
  • The taxpayer requires additional support
  • Funds in the account belong to another person
  • A joint account holder has a beneficial interest in the money

An objection would pause deductions while HMRC reviewed the case. The proposed appeal route has not been finalised, although HMRC is considering a timeframe similar to the usual 30-day tax appeal deadline.

A complaint would be different from an objection. Complaining about HMRC’s service would not automatically stop deductions, although HMRC could intervene where its investigation identified an error or serious procedural failure.

Also Read: HMRC Automatic Bank Deductions: What Beneficiaries Must Know Now

How Would HMRC Decide Whether Monthly Deductions Are Affordable?

HMRC is considering using tax records, business information and credit reference data to estimate affordable monthly payments. The final methodology has not been decided and forms a significant part of the consultation.

For individuals, HMRC might consider PAYE information, Self Assessment returns and other income records. For businesses, it could consider VAT turnover figures or recently filed accounts.

The consultation also considers applying HMRC’s existing Time to Pay affordability principle. This generally means that debt repayments should not exceed 50% of the taxpayer’s disposable income.

However, an automated assessment may not reflect current circumstances. Historical profits, turnover or PAYE data may give an inaccurate picture after redundancy, illness, loss of a customer or a sudden decline in trading.

Taxpayers would therefore need to contact HMRC promptly where the suggested payment creates hardship. Financial difficulty would not automatically exclude someone from the process if they continued to ignore HMRC.

Under the current proposal:

  • There would be no standard payment-plan length.
  • Payment periods could vary according to debt and affordability.
  • Penalties associated with the debt would stop accruing once deductions began.
  • Interest could continue until the balance was cleared.
  • HMRC is not currently proposing a fixed minimum balance that must remain in the account.

These details remain subject to consultation and could change before legislation is drafted.

How Is the Proposal Different From Existing Direct Recovery of Debts?

The proposed system would collect smaller liabilities through recurring instalments, while existing Direct Recovery of Debts normally involves holding and removing a lump sum. Existing DRD also has different thresholds and safeguards.

Under current DRD rules, HMRC can use bank information to recover established debts of more than £1,000. It must leave at least £5,000 available across the taxpayer’s accounts after placing the hold.

Existing DRD is largely manual. It involves obtaining bank information, placing money on hold and allowing the taxpayer 30 calendar days to object before funds are transferred.

The proposed lower-value system would instead:

  • Operate through regular monthly deductions
  • Be designed for high-volume use
  • Use automated eligibility and affordability checks
  • Potentially have a 14-day initial notice period
  • Apply without the existing £5,000 protected account balance, provided the instalments pass affordability checks

HMRC restarted existing DRD through a controlled test phase in September 2025 and began a wider rollout from April 2026. The new monthly instalment proposal is separate and would require legislation before HMRC could use it.

What Should You Do If You Owe Smaller Tax Debts Now?

You should contact HMRC as soon as you know that a tax payment cannot be made in full. Early engagement provides more options than waiting for the debt to move into enforcement.

HMRC may agree to a Time to Pay arrangement where the proposed payments are realistic and affordable. Taxpayers setting up a plan should prepare details of their income, regular spending, assets, savings and other tax liabilities.

Companies may also be asked how they can reduce the debt by releasing assets, obtaining finance or introducing funds. HMRC will expect a company’s proposal to address both the overdue balance and its ability to meet future tax payments.

As at 16 July 2026, the main HMRC late-payment interest rate is 7.75%, applying from 9 January 2026. The rate is linked to the Bank of England base rate and can change, so it should be checked again before publication.

Ignoring the debt can lead to:

  • Referral to a debt collection agency
  • Recovery through PAYE or pension income
  • Taking Control of Goods
  • Direct recovery from bank accounts
  • Court proceedings
  • Bankruptcy or company winding-up action in serious cases

HMRC should provide notice before taking enforcement action, but continued non-engagement substantially reduces the opportunity to agree a voluntary solution.

Where an HMRC letter appears incorrect, retain the correspondence and supporting records. Consider obtaining advice before making admissions or agreeing to a payment schedule. 

FAQs About Lower Value Tax Debts

Can HMRC Take Money From My Bank Account Now?

Yes, HMRC already has Direct Recovery of Debts powers in limited circumstances. Existing DRD normally applies where more than £1,000 is owed and at least £5,000 would remain available across the taxpayer’s accounts. The proposed automated monthly deductions for lower-value debts are separate and are not yet law.

Could HMRC Use a Joint Bank Account?

Under the proposal, HMRC would consider a joint account only where no suitable sole account existed or a sole account held insufficient funds. A non-debtor joint account holder would be able to object where the money belonged to them. The final joint-account rules have not yet been legislated.

Would a Time to Pay Agreement Prevent Automatic Deductions?

An active and agreed Time to Pay arrangement would be outside the proposed automated deduction process. Taxpayers must maintain the agreed payments and keep up with new tax liabilities. A failed arrangement could lead HMRC to reconsider enforcement options.

Would Interest Stop Once Monthly Deductions Begin?

The consultation proposes stopping further penalties associated with the debt when instalment deductions begin. It does not propose stopping late-payment interest, which may continue until the balance is cleared. The precise interest treatment should be confirmed in any final legislation.

Can I Object Because I Cannot Afford the Proposed Payment?

Yes. Financial hardship is one of the proposed grounds for objection, and an objection would pause deductions while HMRC reviewed the case. You should provide current evidence of income, essential expenditure, cash flow and other debts rather than relying on a general statement that the payment is unaffordable.

Do I Need an Accountant to Deal With an HMRC Tax Debt?

An accountant is not legally required, but professional support can help verify the liability, correct returns, prepare affordability evidence and negotiate a realistic payment proposal. Advice is particularly valuable where the debt covers several taxes, the amount is disputed or HMRC is considering enforcement action.

How Can Apex Accountants Help With HMRC Tax Debt?

Apex Accountants can review how the liability arose, reconcile HMRC’s figures, identify errors and prepare a practical proposal for payment. Where the matter involves disputed assessments or formal enforcement, our HMRC tax investigation services can support communication and representation.

The sensible next step is to address the debt before HMRC exhausts its standard collection process. Book a consultation to discuss the liability, available payment options and any urgent HMRC correspondence.

Inheritance Tax Calculation UK: How It Works in 2026

A client came to Apex Accountants earlier this year after inheriting her late father’s house and modest savings. She was convinced the estate was far too small to attract any tax. It turned out her father had also gifted a large sum to her brother four years before he died, something she knew nothing about until the executors began pulling the paperwork together. That gift changed the whole calculation. It is a scenario we see often, and it is why inheritance tax calculation UK guidance matters before families assume an estate is too small to attract tax. 

With thresholds frozen for years and property values still climbing, the inheritance tax has quietly become one of the most talked about taxes in the country. Below, we answer the questions clients ask us most, in the order the calculation actually follows.

What is the basic tax-free allowance?

Every individual has a nil rate band of £325,000. The nil rate band has been fixed at that level since 2009 and, following Budget 2025, will remain frozen until 5 April 2031. Anything left within this threshold passes free of tax.

Is there anything else?

Yes. Where a main home is left to children, grandchildren or other direct descendants, an additional residence nil rate band of £175,000 can apply, taking a single person’s threshold to £500,000. This allowance is not automatic. It only applies to the value of a qualifying home passing to direct descendants and does not extend to lifetime gifts.

What about married couples?

Any part of the nil rate band or residence nil rate band that is left unused on the first death can be transferred to the surviving spouse or civil partner. In practice, this means a couple can often pass on up to £1 million between them before tax becomes due, provided the family home goes to children or grandchildren.

Does the residence allowance taper away for larger estates?

It does. For estates worth more than £2 million, the residence nil rate band is reduced by £1 for every £2 above that threshold. Once an estate reaches £2.35 million, the residence allowance disappears completely, leaving only the standard £325,000 threshold.

What rate do inheritance tax accountants UK apply above the thresholds? 

The standard rate is 40%, charged only on the portion of the estate above the available allowances. If at least 10% of the net estate is left to charity, the rate on the taxable remainder drops to 36%, which is worth factoring in at the will drafting stage rather than after the event.

How did the gift affect the inheritance tax calculation UK families had to make? 

This is the part people underestimate most. Gifts made in the seven years before death are generally pulled back into the estate for tax purposes. This is often called the seven-year rule. If a person survives seven years after making a gift, it falls outside the estate entirely. If they do not, the gift is added back, using up the nil rate band before the rest of the estate is assessed.

Where gifts made in that seven-year window exceed the nil rate band, taper relief can reduce the rate charged, but only on the portion of tax due, not on the value of the gift itself. The reduction runs on a sliding scale: full tax applies to gifts made within three years of death, then the effective rate steps down the longer the person survived afterwards, reaching its lowest point for gifts made between six and seven years before death.

Are any gifts exempt from the start?

Several are, and they sit outside the seven-year rule altogether, as set out in GOV.UK’s guidance on gifts:

  • An annual exemption of £3,000 per tax year, which can be carried forward one year if unused
  • Small gifts of up to £250 per person, provided no other exemption was used on that person in the same year
  • Wedding gifts, with limits depending on the relationship to the giver
  • Regular gifts made from surplus income, provided the giver’s standard of living is unaffected
  • Gifts between spouses or civil partners, and gifts to UK-registered charities

Is there anything on the horizon that could change these calculations?

Yes, and it is significant. From 6 April 2027, most unused pension funds and pension death benefits will be brought within the value of a person’s estate for inheritance tax purposes, following legislation confirmed in the Finance Act 2026. Pensions have historically sat outside the estate altogether, so this change will bring a meaningful number of estates into scope for the first time and increase the liability for others. Anyone relying on their pension as a tax-efficient way to pass on wealth should review that plan with accountants for inheritance tax planning well before the change takes effect. 

Where do we come in? 

For a reliable inheritance tax calculation UK families can act on, work out the full picture before assuming an estate is too small to matter. Add together the value of the home, savings, investments, and any gifts made in the past seven years, then apply the allowances in the right order. Getting the sequence wrong, or missing a lifetime gift, is one of the most common reasons families are caught out, and it is exactly the kind of detail inheritance tax accountants UK are asked to unpick once HMRC has already raised a question. 

The better approach is to work through the calculation properly before that happens. If you are unsure how your estate would be assessed, get in touch with Apex Accountants, accountants for inheritance tax planning, for a clear, professional review. It is a straightforward conversation now, rather than a complicated one later.

Tax Rules for Hair and Beauty Businesses in the UK

Hair and beauty businesses often use flexible working models. A salon may have employees, chair renters, mobile stylists, freelance beauty therapists, and room renters working under one roof.

That flexibility can work well, but it also creates tax risk.

The key issue is not just what a contract says. The real working arrangement matters too. As per the hair and beauty tax rules, workers in this industry are either employed or self-employed, and that status affects income tax, national insurance, and VAT responsibilities.

For salon owners, barbers, nail technicians, beauty therapists, and chair renters, this is now a good time to review contracts, payment flows, client ownership, and VAT treatment.

At Apex Accountants, we help hair and beauty businesses get these areas right before small issues become expensive problems.

What the new tax guidance for hair and beauty services

The latest focus is on how people actually work in salons, barbershops, and beauty studios.

There is no special new tax rate for hair and beauty services. The real change is clearer guidance on employment status and VAT treatment.

This matters because the wrong setup can affect the following:

AreaWhy it matters
Employment statusIt affects who pays Income Tax and National Insurance.
Chair rentalIt can create VATable income for the salon.
Client paymentsIt affects who reports sales and VAT.
Self-AssessmentFreelancers may need to file tax returns.
Making Tax DigitalSome sole traders now need digital records.

The main lesson is simple. A business model must match daily working practice.

HMRC employment status guidance for the hair and beauty industry – employment or self-employed

Employment status is one of the biggest tax issues in hair and beauty.

A person may be called ‘freelance’, ‘self-employed’ or a ‘chair renter.’ That label is not enough. The actual working pattern must support it.

The contract and the daily setup both matter.

Working pointMore like employedMore like self-employed
HoursSalon sets hoursWorker chooses hours
Days workedSalon decidesWorker decides
ClientsSalon provides clientsWorker finds own clients
ProductsSalon provides productsWorker buys or chooses products
TasksSalon controls dutiesWorker manages own work
PayFixed wage or rateWorker sets own prices
Time offSalon controls leaveWorker chooses leave

When a worker is likely to be employed

A worker is more likely to be employed if the salon controls their working day.

This may include:

  • setting start and finish times
  • deciding which days they work
  • booking clients for them
  • setting prices
  • providing products
  • assigning tasks
  • monitoring performance
  • paying a fixed hourly rate or salary

Employees have income tax and national insurance deducted through PAYE. Apprentices in salons will normally fall into this employed category.

When a worker is likely to be self-employed

A worker is more likely to be self-employed if they run their work like their own business.

This may include:

  • choosing when and where they work
  • finding their own clients
  • keeping their own client records
  • buying products and equipment
  • setting their own prices
  • taking payments from clients
  • paying rent or commission to the salon
  • working at more than one salon
  • only earning money when they have appointments

Chair renters, mobile stylists, and beauty therapists who visit clients at home can fall into this category, but only where the facts support it.

Mixed work is common

Some people work in more than one way.

For example, a stylist may be employed by a salon during the week and also have private clients outside those hours. In that case, they may have employment income and self-employed income.

This means the tax treatment may be split.

The PAYE income is handled by the employer. The private client income may need to be reported through self-assessment.

Why getting employment status wrong is risky

Wrong status can lead to unpaid tax, National Insurance, interest, and penalties.

The risk is higher where a salon treats someone as self-employed but still controls their work like an employee.

Salon owners should review:

  • contracts
  • rotas
  • pricing control
  • client ownership
  • product supply
  • booking systems
  • payment handling
  • rent or commission agreements

The aim of the HMRC employment status guidance for the hair and beauty industry is to make the paperwork match the business model.

VAT rules for chair rental

Chair rental is one of the most important VAT areas for salons.

Where a salon rents chair space to self-employed stylists, the supply to those stylists is subject to VAT. This rule can apply even if the stylist has a licence to occupy the chair space.

This is because chair rental often includes more than space. It may include access to washbasins, reception areas, waiting areas, and other salon facilities.

A VAT-registered salon must treat this income correctly on its VAT return.

Read: Zero-Rated VAT on Hair Loss Treatments: Mark Glenn Ltd v HMRC Explained

Who accounts for VAT on client takings

VAT treatment depends on who supplies the service to the client.

Business modelVAT treatment
Stylists are employeesThe salon supplies the service and accounts for VAT on gross takings.
Self-employed stylists supply services to the salonThe salon accounts for VAT on gross takings. The stylist may also have VAT duties if registered or required to register.
Stylists supply services direct to their own clientsVAT depends on the stylist’s own takings and VAT position. Payments passed to the salon are payment for the salon’s own supplies, such as chair rent.

This is why the payment flow matters. The answer changes depending on whether the client belongs to the salon or the self-employed worker.

Signs that a stylist supplies clients directly

A self-employed model is stronger when the stylist is genuinely trading on their own account.

Useful indicators include:

  • Stylists keep their own books and records
  • they set their own prices
  • they have their own clients
  • client pays the stylist
  • stylist handles complaints
  • the stylist controls bookings
  • stylist carries business risk
  • salon charges rent or commission
  • the written agreement reflects the real setup

If the salon controls the client relationship, prices, and payments, the tax position may be different.

VAT registration for salons and beauty businesses

A beauty and hair business must register for VAT if taxable turnover goes over £90,000 in the last 12 months.

Registration is also needed if taxable turnover is expected to go over £90,000 in the next 30 days.

For salons and beauty businesses, taxable turnover may include:

  • hair services
  • beauty treatments
  • nail services
  • barbering
  • product sales
  • chair rental income
  • room rental income
  • commission from self-employed workers

A business can also register voluntarily if turnover is below £90,000. Once registered, VAT must be charged on taxable supplies from the date of registration.

Also Read: Do Hairdressers Charge VAT in the UK?

Flat Rate Scheme for hair and beauty

Some smaller VAT-registered businesses may use the Flat Rate Scheme.

For hairdressing or other beauty treatment services, the flat rate percentage is 13%. A business may pay 16.5% if it is classed as a limited-cost business. This scheme can be useful, but it is not always the best choice.

Before using it, salon owners should check:

  • expected turnover
  • product costs
  • equipment costs
  • VAT on purchases
  • chair rental income
  • whether the limited cost business rule applies

A quick VAT review can help avoid choosing a scheme that costs more than expected.

Self-Assessment for freelancers

Self-employed stylists, barbers, nail technicians, and beauty therapists may need to file a tax return.

A sole trader must usually send a self-assessment tax return if they earn more than £1,000 before deducting expenses. Untaxed tips and commission can also create a filing requirement.

Self-employed workers should keep records of:

  • client payments
  • chair rent
  • room rent
  • stock and product costs
  • equipment costs
  • travel costs
  • training costs
  • insurance
  • phone and booking software costs
  • business bank transactions

Tax is paid on profit, not sales. Good records help show the real profit figure.

Tips in hair and beauty

Tips need careful handling. Income tax applies to tips. Whether National Insurance applies depends on how the tips are paid and managed.

Tip typeTax treatment
Direct tip kept by the workerThe worker must report it. Income Tax applies. National Insurance is not usually due.
Tip paid through the employerTax is deducted through wages. National Insurance may apply depending on the setup.
Tips paid through a troncTax is handled through the Tronc system. National Insurance depends on employer involvement.
Compulsory service chargeTreated like wages if paid to the worker.

Cash tips should not be ignored. They still form part of taxable income.

Making Tax Digital for Income Tax

As making tax digital for income tax now affects some sole traders.

It applies in stages based on qualifying income from self-employment and property:

Qualifying incomeStart date
Over £50,000 in 2024 to 20256 April 2026
Over £30,000 in 2025 to 20266 April 2027
Over £20,000 in 2026 to 20276 April 2028

This can affect freelance stylists, mobile beauty therapists, nail technicians, and barbers who trade as sole traders.

Those in scope need compatible software and digital records.

This is important because many hair and beauty businesses still use notebooks, spreadsheets, or booking apps that are not linked to tax records.

Business rates for salon premises

Physical salons in England may also need to review business rates.

Retail, hospitality, and leisure relief can no longer be newly claimed. From 1 April 2026, business rates are calculated using rate multipliers.

Hair and beauty salons are listed among service businesses that can fall within the retail, hospitality, and leisure multiplier rules, where the property meets the conditions.

This can affect:

  • hair salons
  • nail bars
  • beauty salons
  • tanning shops
  • salons offering non-surgical cosmetic procedures
  • piercing salons

This applies to England only.

Common mistakes to avoid

Hair and beauty businesses should avoid these errors:

  • treating all freelancers as self-employed without checking the facts
  • using chair rental agreements that do not match daily practice
  • missing VAT on chair or room rental
  • counting only profit when checking VAT registration
  • ignoring cash tips
  • mixing personal and business payments
  • failing to keep client payment records
  • waiting too long to prepare for Making Tax Digital
  • assuming a contract is enough on its own

Good tax compliance in this sector starts with clear records and a working model that makes sense.

How We Help Businesses Stay Compliant with HMRC’s New Tax Guidance for Hair and Beauty Services

At Apex Accountants, we support hair and beauty businesses with practical tax and accounting advice.

Our services include:

  • employment status reviews for salons and barbershops
  • chair rental and room rental tax checks
  • VAT registration advice
  • VAT return support
  • Self-assessment for stylists and beauty therapists
  • bookkeeping for salons and freelancers
  • payroll for salon employees
  • Making Tax Digital setup
  • year-end accounts
  • business structure advice

We help salon owners and freelancers build a tax setup that reflects how they actually work.

Conclusion

Hair and beauty tax rules are not just about filing returns on time. The real risk sits in the business model.

Salon owners need to know whether workers are employed or self-employed. They also need to check VAT on chair rental, client takings, tips, self-assessment, and digital reporting.

Freelancers need to know when to register, what records to keep, and how their income should be reported.

Apex Accountants can help hair and beauty businesses review their contracts, VAT position, payment flows, and tax records so the business stays compliant and is easier to manage.

FAQs About Tax Rules for Hair and Beauty Businesses 

Am I self-employed if I rent a chair?

Renting a chair does not automatically make you self-employed for UK tax purposes. Your status depends on whether you control clients, prices, hours, bookings, and payments and operate independently. HMRC’s CEST tool and hair-and-beauty guidance should be used to confirm status.

Does chair rental include VAT?

If the salon is VAT-registered, chair rental to self-employed stylists is normally standard-rated for VAT, especially when facilities like reception, washing, or bookings are included. Pure land/property rent can be exempt, but most salon “chair rentals” are included as taxable.

Do beauty therapists need to register for VAT?

Beauty therapists must register for UK VAT if their taxable turnover exceeds £90,000 in any rolling 12-month period or if they expect to exceed it. Voluntary registration is allowed below the threshold and may help a month-long period reclaim input VAT on business costs.

Do mobile hairdressers need a tax return?

Self-employed mobile hairdressers must file a self-assessment tax return if their gross trading income exceeds £1,000 in a tax year, after using the £1,000 trading allowance. Below this, no return is needed unless they have other reportable income or gains.

Are tips taxable?

All tips and gratuities are subject to UK Income Tax. How they are reported depends on whether customers pay you directly or via the salon; National Insurance may also be due where the employer allocates or manages the tips under PAYE or a tronc.

Does Making Tax Digital apply to beauticians?

MTD for Income Tax applies to self-employed beauticians with qualifying business or property income over £50,000 from April 2026, with the threshold falling to £30,000 in 2027 and £20,000 in 2028. They must use compatible software and send quarterly updates to HMRC.

British Retailers Call for Action on Small-Parcel Import Tax Loophole

British retailers are calling on the government to accelerate plans to close the loophole for small parcel import taxes, which allows overseas sellers to ship low‑value parcels into the UK without paying customs duty. Their appeal comes after the 2025 Autumn Budget confirmed that the longstanding low-value import (LVI) relief will be abolished by March 2029 at the latest. For companies competing with online marketplaces that ship millions of parcels valued at £135 or less, the wait for reform feels too long. Accelerating the closure of the loophole for small parcel import taxes would align the UK with reforms in the United States and European Union, helping restore a level playing field for domestic retailers.

A loophole that has grown too large to ignore

Under current rules, individual consignments valued at £135 or less can enter the UK duty‑free. The relief was originally designed for infrequent and low‑value transactions, but it has become a fundamental part of cross‑border e‑commerce. Parcel operators and customs intermediaries submit simplified declarations using a Bulk Import Reduced Data Set (BIRDS), which allows them to clear multiple consignments at once. This simplification has helped overseas sellers to flood the UK market with very cheap goods. 

HMRC estimates that the number of consignments imported using BIRDS more than tripled between 2021 and 2024, reaching around 600 million parcels a year. During the same period, the value of low-value imports recorded in BIRDS rose from £3.8 billion to £5.9 billion.

Removing customs duty from these parcels made sense when cross-border parcel volumes were low, but the low-value import relief the UK now offers distorts competition. UK‑based retailers import goods in bulk and pay duties at standard tariff rates, while overseas sellers shipping individual parcels valued under £135 effectively avoid customs duty. The government acknowledges that this situation undermines fair competition and has committed to reforms that will require all sellers, regardless of their location, to pay duties on goods sold to UK consumers.

What the government proposes and why it matters

The 2025 Autumn Budget signposted an end to low-value import relief in the UK, describing it as an “unfair customs arrangement” that allows some online retailers to import goods duty-free. HM Treasury and HM Revenue & Customs have since published a detailed consultation outlining UK customs duty changes for parcels and the broader low-value import regime. The document proposes that the new arrangements take effect by March 2029. For UK high street chains, that timetable feels far away, particularly now that the US has removed its $800 de minimis threshold, and the EU plans to eliminate duty relief on consignments under €150 by 2028.

The government’s consultation suggests three key changes:

  • Duty liability shifts to sellers and online marketplaces

Under the proposed LVI customs arrangements, sellers and the operators of online marketplaces will be responsible for paying customs duty on consignments of £135 or less. This mirrors the existing VAT model, where marketplaces must charge and remit UK VAT on low‑value sales. By consolidating liability, duty could be collected through quarterly payments away from the border. That would reduce disruption at ports and ensure duty is visible at the point of sale, improving price transparency.

Potential introduction of an administrative fee

The government is considering a flat fee on low‑value imports to fund the extra customs and border costs associated with processing millions of parcels. This fee would be limited to the cost of services rendered and would be paid by sellers or the platforms facilitating sales. Similar fees have been proposed or introduced in other jurisdictions.

A simplified tariff schedule

To help sellers and marketplaces apply the correct duty without having to assign full commodity codes to every item, officials are exploring a “tariff bucket” system – effectively grouping products into bands with set duty rates. Simplifying classification could make compliance more manageable for overseas sellers unfamiliar with the UK Global Tariff schedule.

The consultation also proposes that overseas sellers without a UK presence appoint a fiscal representative in the UK who would be jointly liable for customs debts. The government intends to maintain the existing relief on gifts valued at £39 or less sent between individuals.

Why retailers want reform sooner

Retailers pressing for change argue that waiting until 2029 will allow overseas platforms to cement an even larger presence in the UK. The consultation notes that low‑value import volumes are already substantial, with an estimated 1.6 million parcels arriving every day. Since the United States abolished duty relief for imports under $800 in 2025 and the EU is moving to scrap its €150 exemption, the UK has become an outlier. Industry groups worry that global sellers will increasingly divert their parcels to UK consumers to exploit the remaining duty relief, further eroding domestic market share. They also highlight product safety concerns; when goods circumvent import duties, they often bypass quality checks.

From a revenue perspective, the low‑value import relief is becoming expensive. Once goods are subject to duty, receipts could help fund public services. Introducing an administrative fee of around £2.60 per parcel, as suggested by some retailers, could raise over £1 billion annually. However, designing and implementing new systems will take time, and businesses need certainty. HM Treasury has therefore signalled that reforms must balance fairness with the practicalities of collecting duty and data at scale.

Practical steps for businesses

Although the new regime and UK customs duty changes for parcels may be several years away, businesses should not wait to prepare. Overseas sellers and marketplace operators should review their supply chains, ensure that systems can capture and report product data, and prepare for quarterly customs duty payments. 

Those not established in the UK may need to appoint a fiscal representative and budget for administrative fees. UK retailers should assess how the changes could affect pricing and inventory strategies; some imports currently shipped under the £135 threshold may become subject to duty and higher costs. 

All stakeholders can respond to the government consultation, which runs until March 2026, and help shape the final design of the new customs arrangements.

The abolition of LVI relief also interacts with VAT. Since January 2021, the UK has abolished the VAT exemption for goods under £15 and requires sellers dispatching goods valued at £135 or less to register for UK VAT and charge it at the point of sale. Businesses must continue to account for VAT correctly while preparing for future customs duties.

How Apex Accountants & Tax Advisors can help

Navigating cross‑border trade rules is complex. Apex Accountants & Tax Advisors works with retailers, online marketplace operators and logistics firms to interpret the evolving customs and VAT landscape. Our team can help you:

  • Analyse how the removal of the LVI relief and the potential small parcel import tax loophole closure will affect your cost base and pricing.
  • Register for UK VAT and design systems to collect customs duty and VAT on low‑value consignments.
  • Prepare for quarterly duty payments and develop processes for appointing fiscal representatives if you do not have a UK establishment.
  • Model the financial impact of possible administrative fees and simplified tariff schedules.

We collaborate closely with clients to ensure compliance with HMRC guidance, integrate duty calculations into accounting systems and plan for changes well ahead of the March 2029 target. Contact Apex Accountants today to discuss tailored strategies for your supply chain and e‑commerce operations.

Frequently asked questions

What is the low-value import relief, and why is it being removed? 

The LVI relief allows consignments of goods valued at £135 or less to enter the UK without paying customs duty. The government plans to abolish it by March 2029 because the relief has been exploited by overseas sellers, distorting competition and undermining tax fairness.

When will the new customs arrangements come into force?

HM Treasury intends the new LVI customs arrangements to take effect by March 2029, but British retailers are urging the government to implement changes sooner.

Who will pay customs duty under the new regime? 

The consultation proposes making sellers and online marketplace operators responsible for paying duty on low‑value consignments, aligning with existing VAT rules.

Will there be any exemptions? 

The government plans to retain the relief for non‑commercial gifts valued at £39 or less sent between private individuals. All other consignments will be subject to customs duty and potentially an administrative fee.

What is the proposed administrative fee and why? 

Officials are considering a flat fee on low‑value imports to cover the cost of processing millions of parcels. Retailers have suggested a fee of about £2.60 per parcel, but the government is still gathering views through its consultation.

How should businesses prepare? 

Companies should ensure they are compliant with VAT rules, plan for quarterly customs duty payments and monitor the consultation. Overseas sellers without a UK presence may need to appoint a fiscal representative. Engaging with advisers, such as Apex Accountants, can help businesses adapt their systems and minimise disruption.

HMRC v M R Currell Ltd [2026] – Genuine Loan via EBT Not Taxable as Salary

In HMRC v M R Currell Ltd [2026] EWCA Civ 445, the Court of Appeal held that an £800,000 payment routed through an Employee Benefit Trust (EBT) was a genuine loan, not taxable employment income, because it carried a real obligation to repay. In April 2026, the court confirmed that Mr Currell received a loan, not extra pay, so he did not gain taxable earnings from the transaction. This clarifies that simply using a trust to channel funds does not automatically turn money into a salary – the substance of the transaction matters.

Disguised remuneration (DR) rules have long targeted schemes that shift pay into loans or benefits via third parties. In 2011 the government enacted Part 7A of ITEPA 2003 to catch such schemes involving intermediaries. Later, the controversial Loan Charge (2019) aimed to tax old loan arrangements. However, under general law, a payment is only taxed as earnings if it arises “from the employment”. As HMRC’s own manuals note, a profit or payment “arose from something else” than employment if it did not truly come as a reward for services. In Currell’s case, the money was a loan – a debt Mr Currell had to pay back – not an additional salary.

Background: Disguised Remuneration & EBT Loans

Disguised Remuneration Rules (Part 7A ITEPA 2003): 

Introduced in 2011 to target third-party schemes avoiding income tax. They tax “relevant steps” (like making a loan through a trust) as if they were paid.

Loan Charge (2019): 

Further rules will tax old disguised remuneration loans. Importantly, changes after a 2025 review limit the charge to loans made on/after 9 Dec 2010.

General Tax Law: 

Under s.62 ITEPA (formerly s.19 ICTA), only payments “from the employment” are earnings. Courts ask, ‘Did the benefit come in return for work or from some other source?’

Example: HMRC’s own guidance says that a gift (e.g., a wedding present) from an employer is not taxed because it’s not “from the employment” but from a personal occasion. By analogy, a genuine loan made to an employee – especially through a trust – may not be “from” the job and thus not automatically considered earnings.

Facts of the Currell Case

DateEvent
Nov 2010Company Contribution: M R Currell Ltd (a small painting business) pays £800,000 into a newly created EBT.
Nov 2010 (same day)Loan to Director: The EBT trustees immediately lend £800,000 to Mr M. Currell (a director) at 0% interest for 5 years, secured on the company shares he buys.
2010 (shortly after)Share Purchase: Mr Currell uses the loan to buy shares (A shares) from his wife. Mrs Currell then loans the money back to the Company.
2011 onwardsTax Challenge: HMRC investigates and assesses the £800k as if it were Mr Currell’s earnings, seeking income tax and NICs.

The key points of the arrangement were that the loan was fully documented, secured by Mr Currell’s shareholding, and he clearly intended (and was able) to repay it. The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) initially treated the payment to the trust as taxable pay, essentially calling it a reward for Mr Currell’s services. On appeal, the Upper Tribunal (UT) found the opposite: the contribution to the EBT was made solely to enable the loan, and since the loan had a real repayment obligation, the payment was not considered earnings.

FTT (201X): 

Viewed the £800k contribution (the “Payment”) as remuneration for Mr Currell’s work, relying on previous cases like RFC 2012 Plc v Advocate General for Scotland (“Rangers”) that held payments to a trust could be earnings when they were agreed upon as part of salary.

UT (2024): 

Ruled that the FTT made an error. It held that the loan itself was genuine and repayable, so the contribution was not Mr Currell’s pay. The UT “remade” the decision in HMRC’s favour (legally speaking) and concluded that the £800k was not taxable as earnings because of the loan’s bona fide nature.

Court of Appeal Decision

The Court of Appeal (CA) upheld the Upper Tribunal. It firmly agreed that the loan was genuine and properly characterised. Key principles from the judgement include the following:

Characterisation Over Purpose: 

The court stressed that the character of a payment must be determined before applying tax law. Money spent on employee benefits does not automatically become “earnings” simply because of the purpose. In Currell’s case, the money went into the trust and then became a loan. The CA emphasised that one must look at what the transaction actually was, not just at why it happened.

Genuine Loan ≠ Earnings: 

A loan with a real promise to repay is not earnings. The court noted that an employee receiving a genuine loan with repayment terms is not getting a benefit worth money in the sense of pay. Instead, any fiscal “benefit” (like zero interest) is taxed under the special loan/beneficial loan charge rules, not as salary. As the CA aptly put it, “In truth, what Mr Currell got was the loan. This was not a case of diverting remuneration to the EBT.”

Read: Everything You Need to Know About Director’s Loan Write-Off and the Douglas Boulton Case

Distinguishing Rangers: 

In Rangers (the 2017 Supreme Court case), it was already common ground that the monies were remuneration; the only question was whether a trust could receive them. Here, by contrast, the very nature of the payment was in dispute. The CA highlighted a “fundamental distinction”: unlike Rangers, in Currell it was not agreed the money was due as salary in the first place. Because the loan was secured and had to be repaid, the Court found it was incorrect to equate it with Mr Currell’s pay.

Limited Circumstances for Taxing Loans: 

The Court noted that only in limited cases – for example, a sham loan or arrangement – could a loan be treated as earnings. On Currell’s facts, there was no sham. The suggestion that a borrower’s control over a lender (e.g., via share ownership) could turn the loan into pay was dismissed; no legal authority supported that idea.

Caution Against Overreach: 

In its concluding remarks, the CA warned that HMRC’s broad approach could have unintended consequences. It gave examples: if every loan through a third party were taxed as pay, ordinary loans (like directors withdrawing loan account balances or loan season-ticket schemes via payroll) might wrongly be caught. This “close inspection of the trees” could miss the bigger picture. The court thus signalled that normal commercial loans should not be swept up as disguised salaries.

In summary, the Court of Appeal agreed that the Upper Tribunal’s conclusion “was the only one that could have been reached” and expressly adopted its view that the £800k was not part of Mr Currell’s earnings.

Practical Implications for Businesses and Advisers

The Currell ruling offers important guidance for businesses, directors and accountants dealing with trust-based benefits.

Genuine loans must be clear: 

Any loan from a company (even via a trust) should be well-documented, with a realistic repayment schedule and security. The court noted Mr Currell’s loan was properly secured on his shares and he had independent means to repay them. Companies should “confirm loans from EBTs/trusts are properly documented, secured, and carry a realistic repayment obligation”.

Characterise the transaction: 

Focus on the substance over the formal route. If an employee receives money that they must repay, it is more logically a loan than extra salary. As HMRC’s rules (and this case) emphasise, one must decide if the benefit came “from the employment”. In practice, explain in writing that the payment is a loan for a commercial purpose (e.g., a share purchase), not a payment for work.

Trustees’ independence: 

Ensure that trustees genuinely make trust decisions, rather than merely rubber-stamping them as the company or director would. The CA pointed to the importance of true trustee control. If trustees simply do what the employer directs, HMRC may argue the trust is a sham conduit.

Use Currell in disputes: 

If HMRC challenges a loan from EBT as disguised remuneration, this case is strong authority (for pre-2011 schemes) to insist the loan is taxed as such, not as salary. Advisers should request that HMRC confirm the character of the payment (loan vs remuneration) and cite Currell’s reasoning on s.62 analysis.

Beware modern DR rules: 

Currell was a pre-2011 loan (Part 7A came into force in Oct 2011) and a pre-loan charge. After 2011, the law expanded to treat many third-party loans as income immediately. The Court acknowledged that Parliament later closed this gap. So do not assume that post-2011 or Loan Charge-era loans can avoid tax; new anti-avoidance rules will often apply. In short, Currell vindicates older arrangements, but “for post-2011 structures, Currell does not provide a free pass.”

Review legacy schemes: 

This decision is an opportunity to re-check any old EBT or loan arrangements. Where a loan was truly made and intended to be repaid (even if it was tax-advantaged), Currell suggests it was not income at the time. Conversely, any sham or purely circular schemes should be unwound or settled.

Seek expert advice: 

The line between a legitimate loan and a disguised salary can be fine. Specialist tax advice (or even HMRC clearance) is prudent for complex arrangements. The Currell judgement itself recommends getting professional opinions and structuring “defensively” under Part 7A rules.

How We Help

As chartered accountants and tax specialists, Apex Accountants can help you navigate EBT schemes and employee tax:

  • Tax planning & compliance: We advise on structuring loans, share purchases or benefits so they meet legal requirements and minimise tax risk.
  • Disguised remuneration & EBT advice: Our team stays up to date on cases like Currell. We can review any trust-based arrangements and ensure they pass the correct legal tests.
  • HMRC dispute support: If you face an enquiry or need to appeal an HMRC decision, we can help develop your case (for example, using Currell to argue your loan was not taxable earnings).
  • Loan Charge guidance: We assist clients with historic loan schemes to check if and how the Loan Charge or new rules apply.
  • Tailored accounting services: From company accounts to payroll taxes and beyond, we provide practical support to UK businesses of all sizes.

With our expertise, you’ll get clear, practical advice grounded in the latest laws and court decisions. We aim to protect your interests and help you stay compliant without paying more tax than necessary.

Conclusion

The HMRC v M R Currell Ltd [2026] case is a reminder to look at the true nature of payments. A bona fide loan – even one routed through an EBT – should be treated as a loan for tax purposes, not as hidden earnings. This means thorough documentation and honest substance are vital. While later legislation (Part 7A, Loan Charge) has tightened the rules, Currell restores balance for older arrangements. It shows that legitimate trust arrangements with real loans won’t automatically trigger income tax just because a trust is involved. For specific situations, always seek tailored advice.

Contact Apex Accountants for expert support on employment taxes, EBT schemes and any HMRC issues. We’ll help you understand how cases like HMRC v Currell Ltd may affect your affairs and ensure you comply with tax law.

FAQs About HMRC v M R Currell Ltd [2026]

What was the main point of the Currell judgement?

The Court of Appeal confirmed that when a company’s contribution to a trust is used to fund a loan to an employee, this loan – if genuine and repayable – is not automatically taxable as earnings. In Currell’s case, the £800k he received was treated as a loan (with a real obligation to repay), not as salary.

How is this different from the Rangers’ case?

Rangers (2017) held that if an employee contracts to have part of their salary paid to a trust, it is taxable when it enters the trust. In Currell, by contrast, the court found that the parties disputed whether any salary was ever deferred; here, the arrangement was purely a loan. The Court emphasized that, unlike Rangers, it did not agree that Mr Currell had earned this money as pay.

Does this mean EBT loans are tax-free?

Not always. Currell specifically involved a loan made in 2010, before new anti-avoidance rules (Part 7A ITEPA, Loan Charge) took effect. The Court’s logic focused on that time. Today, many loans via trusts fall under strict DR legislation. However, Currell shows that if a loan was genuinely commercial and was entered into before 2011, it may not have been considered “earnings,” even if it was routed through a trust.

What should employers do now?

Companies should ensure any employee loans (direct or through trusts) are bona fide: documented, secured, and repaid. If using an EBT or similar vehicle, trustees must act independently. In case of HMRC enquiries, use the Currell case to argue that the loan should be taxed under the loan rules, not as salary, by highlighting the legal distinction. Always keep clear records of the purpose (e.g., a share purchase) to show the commercial rationale.

Will this case affect employees and tax appeals?

Yes. Individuals or employers who took loans from trusts (especially before 2011) can reference this ruling. It may overturn earlier assumptions that “trust = tax avoidance”. For appeals, lawyers and accountants will likely cite Currell when challenging HMRC assessments on genuine loans.

VAT Evasion Penalties in the UK: Cunningsburgh Man Who Evaded £166,000 in Tax Ordered to Pay Just £1

A recent case in Shetland has put the spotlight on VAT fraud and confiscation orders in the UK. A businessman from Cunningsburgh, who fraudulently claimed £166,000 in VAT refunds, was sentenced to 18 months in prison, highlighting the severe VAT evasion penalties in the UK, and ordered to pay only £1 under the Proceeds of Crime Act. The man, a company director in his forties, exploited the VAT system by inflating invoices, claiming input tax on personal purchases, and submitting falsified bank statements to HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC). Despite the significant financial wrongdoing, the court was only able to enforce a token confiscation order due to the man’s lack of assets to seize.

This case highlights the risks of VAT fraud and raises concerns for UK businesses about the consequences of such offences. With the tax authorities pursuing strict punishments for fraudsters, this case serves as a reminder to businesses about the importance of VAT compliance and the consequences of evading tax responsibilities.

How the fraud was carried out

Evidence presented in court suggested that the Cunningsburgh director used a mix of fraudulent techniques:

  • Falsified paperwork – he created or edited invoices and bank statements to inflate the value of purchases or to show that personal expenses were legitimate business costs. Under the VAT system, businesses can reclaim the tax paid on goods and services used in their trade; by doctoring documents, he increased his input tax claims.
  • Misuse of personal purchases – personal items such as vehicles and household goods were bought at the normal VAT-inclusive price and then claimed as business expenses. HMRC considers such behaviour fraudulent VAT evasion because the input tax is not attributable to taxable supplies.
  • Sustained deception – local reports indicate that the fraud continued for almost two years before HMRC identified irregularities. The sentencing judge at Lerwick Sheriff’s Court described the behaviour as “devious” and “calculated.”

The fraudulent scheme was uncovered after VAT compliance services for businesses flagged inconsistencies between VAT returns and underlying records. This case further highlights the importance of UK VAT fraud risk management to help businesses avoid such risks and ensure proper VAT compliance. During the sentencing hearing, the judge mentioned the need for a deterrent sentence and stressed that VAT fraud harms the public purse. The 18‑month custodial term is consistent with the Sentencing Council’s guidelines, which state that fraudulent evasion of VAT under section 72 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 can result in custodial sentences of up to 14 years and that offence ranges span from a band C fine to 13 years’ custody.

Fraudulent evasion of VAT is a criminal offence under section 72 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994. The legislation provides for serious penalties. Where a person is knowingly involved in the fraudulent evasion of VAT, they are liable:

  • On summary conviction – to a penalty up to the statutory maximum of £20,000, or three times the amount of VAT evaded, whichever is greater, and up to six months’ imprisonment.
  • On conviction on indictment – to an unlimited fine or imprisonment for up to 14 years, or both. The Sentencing Council notes that the maximum sentence for offences committed on or after February 22, 2024, is increased from seven to fourteen years.

HMRC also has civil penalties for participating in transactions connected with VAT fraud. Company officers may be jointly liable if their actions facilitated the fraud. HMRC’s compliance‑checks factsheet states that when HMRC denies input tax under the ‘knowledge principle’ (where a trader knew or should have known the transaction was fraudulent), the penalty is fixed at 30% of the VAT denied, emphasising the importance of UK VAT fraud risk management.

Confiscation orders and the £1 payment

After criminal convictions, courts can make confiscation orders under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002. These orders require offenders to repay the benefit from their crime. Where no recoverable assets are available, the court may impose a nominal order, often £1. The token order does not wipe out the debt – if assets are discovered later, the full sum can be recovered, and failure to pay can lead to further imprisonment. The Cunningsburgh case thus illustrates a paradox: although the offender stole more than £166,000, he currently has no assets, so he is only ordered to repay a pound. The debt remains enforceable for life and will be revisited if he acquires assets in future.

Implications for UK businesses

This case underscores several broader themes for businesses:

  1. VAT is a trust-based tax – HMRC relies on businesses to submit accurate returns, and VAT compliance services for businesses can help ensure compliance and avoid costly mistakes. Fraudulent claims directly deprive the Treasury of revenue, and HMRC invests significant resources in compliance checks and data analytics. Finding irregularities can lead to civil penalties, public naming, and criminal prosecution.
  2. Directors can be personally liable – under HMRC’s guidance, company officers may be liable for penalties when they knew or should have known that transactions were connected with VAT fraud. Directors should ensure robust controls over invoicing, record‑keeping and VAT calculations.
  3. Fines and prison terms are severe – VAT fraud is not a minor offence. The Value Added Tax Act allows fines up to three times the tax evaded and imprisonment for up to 14 years. Sentences vary according to culpability and harm, but courts take sustained deception seriously, as shown by the 18‑month term in this case.
  4. Confiscation orders persist – nominal orders do not absolve the offender. Businesses and individuals tempted to hide assets should note that the Proceeds of Crime Act enables recovery years after conviction.

Practical steps to prevent VAT fraud

Businesses can mitigate risk and avoid unintentional involvement in VAT fraud by adopting good practices:

  • Strengthen internal controls: implement checks on invoicing and purchasing processes to improve HMRC VAT audit support and help prevent VAT fraud for companies. ensure that all expenses claimed for VAT recovery are wholly and exclusively for business purposes.
  • Keep accurate records: maintain digital and physical records that support VAT claims. HMRC’s Making Tax Digital rules mandate the electronic storage of VAT records.
  • Conduct due diligence on suppliers: if you buy from missing traders or carousel fraudsters, HMRC can deny your input tax claim and charge a 30 % penalty. Verify that suppliers are genuine and VAT‑registered.
  • Seek professional advice early: consult tax advisers before embarking on complex transactions; disclosure of errors to HMRC can reduce penalties.
  • Train staff: ensure finance and procurement teams understand the VAT rules and the difference between business and personal expenditure.

How Apex Accountants & Tax Advisors can help

Apex Accountants & Tax Advisors offers specialist support to prevent VAT abuses like those seen in the case of the Cunningsburgh man who evaded £166,000 in VAT. Our chartered tax advisers assist clients with:

  • Compliance reviews – assessing whether your VAT returns and systems meet HMRC standards.
  • VAT planning: structuring transactions to maximise legitimate relief while avoiding the pitfalls of fraudulent schemes.
  • Representation in HMRC investigations – if HMRC opens a compliance check, we provide expert advocacy and negotiate on your behalf.
  • Training and governance – designing internal controls and staff training to minimise the risk of errors or fraud and enhance HMRC VAT audit support for businesses.

With the tax authority increasingly using sophisticated analytics and the courts imposing severe penalties, expert advice has never been more important. Contact Apex Accountants today to arrange a confidential consultation and ensure your business stays on the right side of the law.

Frequently asked questions

What constitutes VAT fraud?

VAT fraud involves deliberately misstating or concealing information to reduce VAT liabilities. Examples include failing to register for VAT when required, submitting false invoices, claiming input tax on personal expenses, and participating in missing trader carousel schemes. Section 72 of the Value Added Tax Act 1994 criminalises fraudulent VAT evasion.

What penalties can HMRC impose without a criminal prosecution? 

HMRC can deny input tax and levy civil penalties. Under the knowledge principle, the penalty is 30 % of the VAT denied. HMRC may also publish the names of businesses and directors involved in serious VAT fraud.

When must a business register for VAT?

 A UK business must register if its taxable turnover exceeds the registration threshold (currently £90,000 per annum). Deliberate failure to register when required is treated as tax evasion and can lead to penalties or criminal charges.

Can directors be personally liable for VAT fraud committed by their company? 

Yes. HMRC guidance states that company officers who knew or should have known about fraudulent transactions can be liable for all or part of the penalty. Criminal prosecution is also possible under section 72 of the VAT Act.

What happens if someone cannot pay a confiscation order? 

The court may impose a nominal order, often £1, if there are no recoverable assets. However, the full amount remains due, and authorities can recover assets later. Failure to pay confiscation orders can result in additional prison sentences.

How Company Car Tax Bands Work and What You Will Pay

In the UK, most company cars (and vans) used for private purposes fall under benefit-in-kind taxation. The value is calculated using the vehicle’s list price, while the applicable percentage is determined through tax bands for company cars, which are based on CO₂ emissions and the type of fuel used. 

In practice, HMRC publishes percentage bands for each tax year – you multiply the car’s list price by the relevant percentage to get the taxable benefit. Low-emission vehicles attract much lower percentages, while high-emission cars top out at 37%. The taxable value is further reduced if the employee pays anything towards the cost, uses the car only part-time, or has a car has low CO₂ emissions.

How Compay Car Tax Bands Are Calculated

Benefit calculation

The BIK rate is a percentage of the car’s original list price (including VAT and options). HMRC sets the percentage in the CO₂ band. For example, a petrol/diesel car emitting 145 g/km might be taxed at 35% of its list price, whereas a new electric car is taxed at only a few percent.

Emission bands:

Cars are grouped by CO₂ emissions (g/km) and, for hybrids/plug-ins, by their electric-only range. Each band has a set percentage. Lower bands (cleaner cars) pay less tax. The table below summarises the 2025/26 and 2026/27 company car tax rates. (From April 6, 2026 new rates apply.)

CO₂ emissions (g/km) & electric range2025/26 rate (%)2026/27 rate (%)
Zero emission (fully electric)3 %4 %
1–50 (≥130 mile EV range)3 %4 %
1–50 (70–129 mile range)6 %7 %
1–50 (40–69 mile range)9 %10 %
1–50 (30–39 mile range)13 %14 %
1–50 (<30 mile range)15 %16 %
51–5416 %17 %
55–5917 %18 %
60–6418 %19 %
65–6919 %20 %
70–7420 %21 %
≥75 (all higher bands)21 %–37 %21 %–37 %

Table: Company car BIK rates for tax years 2025/26 and 2026/27 by CO₂ emissions and electric range.

Why Electric Cars Have the Lowest Tax Rates

Fully electric cars sit at the lowest end of the tax scale.

For the 2025/26 tax year, the rate is 3%. This increases slightly to 4% in 2026/27.

Plug-in hybrids with a long electric range (130+ miles) follow the same pattern. This makes them a strong option for reducing overall tax liability.

Also Read: VAT on Car Hire in the UK – What Businesses Need to Know

How Plug-in Hybrids and Mid-Range Cars Are Changing

Other plug-in hybrids are also seeing small increases. Each band rises by 1 percentage point depending on electric range.

For example:

  • 70–129 miles range → slight increase
  • 40–69 miles range → slight increase
  • Below 30 miles range → higher tax compared to longer-range models

Cars with moderate emissions (51–74 g/km) also move up by 1%.

  • A car emitting 65–69 g/km increases from 19% to 20%

Higher emissions continue to push vehicles into more expensive brackets.

When These Changes Came Into Effect

The updated rates apply from:

  • April 2025 (2025/26 tax year)
  • April 2026 (2026/27 tax year)

These changes form part of a gradual shift rather than a sudden increase.

What to Expect in the Coming Years

Tax rates for electric vehicles will rise slowly over time.

Planned increases include:

Even with these changes, electric cars will remain the most tax-efficient option.

The Highest Tax Rates for Petrol and Diesel Cars

Petrol and diesel vehicles continue to sit at the top end of the tax scale.

  • The maximum rate remains at 37%
  • This applies once emissions go above 160 g/km

In simple terms, the higher the emissions, the higher the tax.

How it works

The employee’s taxable benefit is calculated by:

  1. This is the car’s list price, which includes any accessories and VAT.
  2. Applying the appropriate percentage from the table above.
  3. Multiplying by the employee’s income tax rate (e.g., 20% or 40%) to find the tax due.

Example: A £30,000 car with 0 g/km CO₂ (electric) has a 3% BIK in 2025/26. The taxable benefit is 3% of £30,000 = £900. A 20% taxpayer would pay £180 in tax (20% of £900).

Special cases:

  • If you pay something towards the car’s cost (e.g., contribute to the lease or petrol), such payment reduces the taxable value.
  • Part-time availability (less than 15 hours/week) also reduces the taxable benefit.
  • Employer-provided fuel for private use is a separate charge: free petrol/diesel triggers a fuel benefit (using a fixed multiplier × BIK%). For 2026/27 the fuel multiplier is £29,200 (up from £28,200). Electric charging at home is treated differently and generally has no fuel benefit charge if no fuel is given.

Staying up to date:

HMRC guidance is updated each year. For example, HMRC’s table (Appendix 2) was updated in April 2026 to include the new 4% EV rate. Always check the latest GOV.UK guidance or use HMRC’s online calculator to estimate your specific tax.

Read: 5 VAT Strategies For Car Garages To Use In 2026

Key Points on Low-Emission Vehicles

  • Electric cars (0 g/km) enjoy very low tax. From April 2026, their BIK rate is 4%, up from 3% previously. The charge is based on list price, not fuel costs.
  • Plug-in hybrids are taxed by their declared CO₂ and electric range. A PHEV with a 100 miles range might pay 10–14%, whereas the same model with only 30 miles would pay 14–16%. The ranges and rates are in the table above.
  • Future changes: The government has signalled that EVBIK will rise by 2% each year until 2029. This was confirmed in the 2024 Autumn Budget. Consequently, the BIK rates for even very clean cars will gradually increase – though they will remain much lower than for fossil-fuel cars.

How We Help Businesses Manage Tax on Company Cars

At Apex Accountants, we help businesses and employees navigate company car taxation and other benefits. Our services include:

  • Tax planning for company cars: Advice on choosing cars, salary sacrifice schemes, and calculating company car BIK to minimise tax costs.
  • Payroll and Benefits administration: Managing P11D returns, payroll adjustments and ensuring the correct reporting of car benefits.
  • Company tax and VAT advice: Ensuring employer expenses and deductions (leasing, maintenance) are handled correctly.
  • Employee benefits consulting: Structuring car and fuel benefits packages that meet business needs and compliance requirements.

Whether you’re an employer arranging a fleet or an employee reviewing your company car deal, our experts can clarify the rules and optimise your tax position.

FAQs About Tax on Company Cars

When do car tax rates change? 

Company car BIK rates update every tax year (6 April). Recent uprating occurred in April 2025 and April 2026. The rates are normally set in Budget or tax announcements and then published by HMRC.

How do I know which CO₂ figure to use for my car? 

HMRC gives tables in terms of grams per km under the WLTP (new) or NEDC (old) test cycles. Use the official CO₂ figure from the manufacturer’s spec. (When in doubt, HMRC’s calculator or your payroll department will use the correct value.)

What about tax on fuel costs? 

If your employer pays for your private fuel, a separate fuel benefit charge applies. The car fuel multiplier is £29,200 for 2026/27. Electric charge at home generally isn’t taxed as fuel.

Can I reduce my car tax? 

Yes. Paying a contribution toward the car’s value or insurance reduces the taxable benefit. Taking a cheaper car or an older car (with a lower list price) also lowers the overall tax.

Where can I find official information about tax on cars and other vehicles?

All rates and rules are published on GOV.UK. See HMRC’s Company car Benefit— appropriate percentage tables for each year and HMRC guides on company car tax.

What Businesses Need to Know About Tax Changes in UK 

In the United Kingdom, “new financial year” can mean two things. The government’s financial year typically runs from 1 April, while the personal tax year runs from 6 April to 5 April. For 2026/27, the tax year started on 6 April 2026.  This matters because a lot of the practical tax changes in UK (PAYE, National Insurance, dividend tax rates, capital gains tax relief rates, and the rollout of Making Tax Digital for Income Tax) start from 6 April. 

Key dates at the start of the year

DateWhat it means in practice
1 April 2026Start of the Corporation Tax “year” (financial year) for rates that apply to companies’ profits (depending on accounting period start dates). 
6 April 2026Start of the 2026/27 tax year (Income Tax and National Insurance settings apply from this date, and several targeted changes take effect). 
5 April 2026Cut-off to register for voluntary payrolling of benefits in kind for the 2026/27 tax year (if you want to payroll benefits instead of using P11Ds). 

Personal tax changes for 2026/27

Most headline Income Tax rates are unchanged, but allowances and thresholds still drive what you actually pay. 

Income Tax bands and thresholds

For most people in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, the standard Personal Allowance remains £12,570, and the basic/higher/additional rate structure is unchanged. 

Read: How to Increase Your Tax-Free Personal Allowance to £20,070 Through HMRC Rent-a-Room Scheme

If your adjusted net income is over £100,000, your personal allowance is tapered away at £1 for every £2 over £100,000, reaching zero at £125,140. 

AreaBand (2026/27)Taxable incomeRate
England, Wales, Northern IrelandPersonal AllowanceUp to £12,5700%
Basic rate£12,571 to £50,27020%
Higher rate£50,271 to £125,14040%
Additional rateOver £125,14045%

These bands are set out in government guidance for the 2026/27 tax year. 

Tax changes for Scottish taxpayers

If you live in Scotland, you pay Scottish income tax rates on wages, pensions and most other non-savings, non-dividend taxable income. Dividends and savings interest remain taxed at UK-wide rates. 

AreaBand (2026/27)Taxable incomeRate
ScotlandPersonal AllowanceUp to £12,5700%
Starter rate£12,571 to £16,53719%
Basic rate£16,538 to £29,52620%
Intermediate rate£29,527 to £43,66221%
Higher rate£43,663 to £75,00042%
Advanced rate£75,001 to £125,14045%
Top rateOver £125,14048%

The tax changes for Scotland taxpayers in the 2026/27 financial year include updated income tax bands and rates, reflecting changes that affect both higher and lower earners across Scotland.

Dividend tax rises from 6 April 2026

A clear “start of tax year” change for investors and owner-managed businesses is dividend taxation. From 6 April 2026:

  • the dividend ordinary rate rises to 10.75%
  • the dividend upper rate rises to 35.75%
  • the dividend additional rate stays at 39.35% 

The dividend allowance remains £500 for 2026/27 (so you only pay dividend tax on dividends above this allowance, after considering how the allowance interacts with your wider Income Tax position). 

For close companies, it is also worth noting that the “loans to participators” charge is linked to the dividend upper rate and therefore moves in line with that increase. 

Capital Gains Tax and relief rates

The Capital Gains Tax Annual Exempt Amount for individuals remains £3,000 for 2026/27 (with a lower allowance of £1,500 for most trustees). 

For many disposals in 2026/27, government guidance shows CGT rates at 18% and 24% for individuals (depending on whether you are a basic rate or higher/additional rate Income Tax payer), with trustees and personal representatives generally at 24% (subject to the detailed rules). 

Business Asset Disposal Relief goes to 18%

If you are selling a business (or qualifying shares), the rate under Business Asset Disposal Relief increases again.

Business Asset Disposal Relief means you pay:

  • 18% on qualifying gains for disposals on or after 6 April 2026
  • 14% for disposals between 6 April 2025 and 5 April 2026 (and 10% for earlier disposals) 

This change is also reflected in wider official CGT policy material. 

Investors’ Relief similarly moves to 18% for disposals on or after 6 April 2026. 

Inheritance Tax changes affecting farms and family businesses from 6 April 2026

Another major change that takes effect from 6 April 2026 is a reform to 100% Agricultural Property Relief and 100% Business Property Relief.

Official guidance confirms that, for deaths on or after 6 April 2026, the combined value of qualifying agricultural or business property that can receive 100% relief is capped at £2.5 million. 

Where qualifying value exceeds £2.5 million, relief at the lower rate (50%) applies to the excess. 

The allowance can also be transferable between spouses and civil partners if a claim is made, and rules also apply for trusts. 

Business and employer changes for 2026/27

For employers, the start of the tax year is primarily a payroll event. Rates, thresholds, and employer reliefs need to be correct from the first pay run after 6 April. 

National Insurance rates and thresholds

For 2026/27, published National Insurance contribution rates show:

  • employees in the main category (A) pay 8% on earnings above the Primary Threshold up to the Upper Earnings Limit, and 2% above that 
  • employers pay 15% on earnings above the Secondary Threshold (with modified treatment for specific categories such as under-21s and apprentices) 
  • Class 1A and Class 1B National Insurance on expenses and benefits is 15% for 2026/27 

The key thresholds that align strongly with payroll for 2026/27 include:

  • Primary Threshold: £242 per week (£12,570 per year)
  • Secondary Threshold: £96 per week (£5,000 per year)
  • Upper Earnings Limit: £967 per week (£50,270 per year) 

Employment Allowance remains a key employer offset

The employment allowance can reduce eligible employers’ annual employer (secondary) Class 1 National Insurance liability by up to £10,500. 

HMRC guidance also confirms that the previous restriction linked to having more than £100,000 of secondary Class 1 NIC liability (in the prior year) ceased from 6 April 2025 onwards. 

Corporation Tax for financial years starting 1 April

Corporation Tax rates depend on profits, and the published table for Corporation Tax years starting 1 April shows:

  • 19% small profits rate for companies with profits under £50,000
  • 25% main rate for companies with profits over £250,000
  • marginal relief applies between those limits (with published limits and fraction). 

VAT thresholds and registration

The VAT registration threshold is more than £90,000 of taxable turnover (rolling 12-month test). The voluntary deregistration threshold is £88,000. 

If you exceed the threshold, government guidance explains that you must register within 30 days of the end of the month when you went over the threshold. It also sets out the “effective date of registration” as the first day of the second month after you go over. 

Making Tax Digital for Income Tax begins for many from April 2026

For sole traders and landlords, the biggest operational change at the start of 2026/27 is the move into Making Tax Digital for Income Tax.

Who must comply from 6 April 2026

Government guidance confirms Making Tax Digital for Income Tax becomes mandatory from 6 April 2026 for individuals with qualifying income over £50,000 from self-employment and property. 

It is being phased in, with published thresholds showing:

  • qualifying income over £50,000 → mandatory from 6 April 2026
  • qualifying income over £30,000 → mandatory from 6 April 2027
  • qualifying income over £20,000 → mandatory from 6 April 2028 

What it changes day-to-day

HMRC guidance states that you (or your agent) will need compatible software to keep digital records and send quarterly updates, and then submit your tax return and pay tax due by 31 January after the end of the tax year. 

There is also a published first-year “soft landing” on quarterly update penalties: where you are required to use MTD from 6 April 2026, HMRC will not apply penalty points for late quarterly updates in the first year (2026/27), though penalties still apply for late tax returns and late payment. 

Start-of-year checklist

A clean start in April saves time (and usually stress) later in the year.

Individuals and families:

  • Check your tax bands and Personal Allowance position, especially if your income is around £100,000 (Personal Allowance taper) or close to £125,140. 
  • If you receive dividends outside ISAs and pensions, update your 2026/27 dividend tax estimates for the rate rise. 
  • If you are planning a business sale or exit, factor in the Business Asset Disposal Relief rate now being 18% for disposals on or after 6 April 2026. 
  • If you have significant farm or business assets, review Inheritance Tax exposure under the new £2.5 million cap on 100% relief for deaths on or after 6 April 2026. 

Employers:

  • Confirm payroll software has the correct 2026/27 PAYE and National Insurance settings. 
  • Check Employment Allowance eligibility and ensure it is being claimed correctly (up to £10,500). 
  • If you want to payroll benefits in kind for 2026/27, registration needed to be completed by 5 April 2026. 

Sole traders and landlords:

  • Use HMRC’s eligibility guidance to confirm if you must join Making Tax Digital from 6 April 2026 and choose compatible software early. 

How We Help You Deal With the Recent UK Tax Updates

At Apex Accountants, we help you translate the rules into practical decisions.

We support clients with:

  • personal tax planning (income tax bands, dividends, CGT planning, and reliefs)
  • director remuneration reviews in light of the 2026/27 dividend tax rates
  • payroll compliance, including correct NIC settings and Employment Allowance claims
  • VAT registration planning and ongoing VAT returns
  • Making Tax Digital for Income Tax readiness: eligibility checks, software setup, and quarterly update workflows
  • exit planning (including Business Asset Disposal Relief considerations) and succession planning where Inheritance Tax relief rules have changed from 6 April 2026

Conclusion

The new 2026/27 tax year brings fewer “headline” rate changes, but several impactful shifts are now live: higher dividend tax rates, an 18% rate under Business Asset Disposal Relief, new Inheritance Tax limits on 100% relief for qualifying farm and business assets, and the first mandatory phase of Making Tax Digital for Income Tax. 

FAQs About 2026 Tax Changes in UK

When does the UK tax year run?

The 2026/27 tax year runs from 6 April 2026 to 5 April 2027. 

What are the recent tax changes in the UK?

Recent tax changes include the Corporation Tax main rate remaining at 25% (unchanged since 2023), with dividend tax rates increasing to 10.75%/35.75% and Business Asset Disposal Relief rising to 18% from April 2026.

Are taxes going up in 2026 in the UK?

Corporation Tax remains at 25% for profits over £250,000 (unchanged since 2023). However, dividend tax rates will rise significantly from 6 April 2026, impacting many taxpayers.

Have Income Tax rates changed for 2026/27?

The main Income Tax rates remain 20%, 40% and 45% for England, Wales and Northern Ireland, with published bands as per government guidance.
If you live in Scotland, the Scottish Income Tax bands and rates apply to most non-savings, non-dividend income and differ from the rest of the UK. 

What are the dividend tax rates for 2026/27?

From 6 April 2026, the dividend ordinary rate is 10.75% and the dividend upper rate is 35.75% (additional rate remains 39.35%), with a £500 dividend allowance. 

What is Business Asset Disposal Relief in 2026/27?

Business Asset Disposal Relief applies a reduced CGT rate to qualifying disposals, and the rate is 18% for disposals on or after 6 April 2026 (compared with 14% in 2025/26). 

What is the VAT threshold in April 2026?

The VAT registration threshold is more than £90,000 of taxable turnover, with an optional deregistration threshold of £88,000. 

Do I need to use Making Tax Digital from April 2026?

Making Tax Digital for Income Tax becomes mandatory from 6 April 2026 if your qualifying income from self-employment and property is over £50,000, with phased expansion in later years. 

Can I just gift 100k to my son?

You can gift £100,000 to your son, but it may be subject to inheritance tax if you pass away within seven years, following the Potentially Exempt Transfer (PET) rule and taper relief.

Who pays 40% tax in the UK?

The 40% higher rate applies to taxable income between £50,271 and £125,140 after the £12,570 Personal Allowance. The Personal Allowance tapers from £100,000, reducing by £1 for every £2 earned over that threshold.

Book a Free Consultation