
The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) delivered an important ruling in 1st Alternative Medical Staffing Ltd v HMRC [2025] TC09678. The Tribunal held that employment costs reimbursed to a medical staffing agency are fully taxable for VAT purposes. The case examined whether these costs, linked to the supply of nurses and care workers to hospitals and care homes, could fall within the VAT exemption for medical or welfare services. The ruling provides important clarification on VAT for medical staffing agencies, particularly where the agency is not subject to statutory regulation and does not deliver medical care directly. The Tribunal dismissed the agency’s argument and confirmed that VAT exemption applies only when the supplier is officially regulated and provides medical care themselves. The decision highlights HMRC’s strict approach to VAT relief in the healthcare staffing sector and reinforces how such services should be treated for VAT.
1st Alternative Medical Staffing Ltd (AMS) supplied nurses and care assistants to NHS trusts, private hospitals, and care homes. These professionals were qualified and registered. All staff worked under the client’s direct supervision, direction, and control.
AMS invoiced its clients by splitting charges into:
– Employment Costs – covering wages, PAYE tax, and other staffing-related costs
– Commission – AMS’s own service fee
AMS charged VAT only on its commission. It treated employment costs as VAT exempt, arguing they related to exempt medical care.
HMRC disagreed with AMS’s VAT treatment. They originally planned to inspect AMS’s VAT returns but were prevented when AMS cancelled the visit.
Following correspondence, HMRC assessed that all amounts received—including reimbursed employment costs—were standard-rated for VAT. The tax authority issued VAT assessments totalling £265,590 for the relevant periods.
AMS challenged the assessments, arguing their services were VAT exempt. They also brought a judicial review, claiming HMRC acted against their “legitimate expectation”. The review failed.
AMS then appealed to the First-tier Tribunal (FTT).
The Tribunal rejected the appeal. It found that AMS was not state regulated. To qualify for the VAT exemption for medical services, suppliers must meet strict conditions set out in Group 7, Schedule 9 of the VAT Act 1994. One of these conditions is regulation by a statutory health authority.
AMS was not approved, licensed, or registered by a statutory health authority. This disqualified them from relying on VAT exemption for medical care services under Note 8.
Even if the entity had been state-regulated, the services must still be “closely related” to medical care.
The Tribunal held that:
The Tribunal concluded that AMS’s services were taxable. The appeal was dismissed.
This ruling is a clear reminder that supplying qualified staff is not enough to secure VAT relief. Agencies operating in healthcare must meet strict exemption criteria before applying zero or exempt treatment. Many businesses in this sector now need to reassess the VAT treatment for healthcare staffing, especially when charging employment-related costs.
Applying the VAT exemption for medical services incorrectly can result in substantial VAT assessments and penalties. HMRC continues to enforce the rules strictly, and businesses must understand the legal conditions before relying on any exemption.
Reimbursed employment costs are not exempt merely because they support the delivery of medical care. If the agency does not deliver regulated medical care itself, VAT applies to the full charge. This view aligns with HMRC’s long-standing interpretation of the legislation.
At Apex Accountants, we believe it’s crucial for healthcare staffing agencies to thoroughly assess their VAT treatment, especially when reimbursed employment costs are involved. Misapplying VAT exemptions could lead to costly financial consequences, including penalties from HMRC.
We recommend that all healthcare staffing agencies review their invoicing structure, contracts, and VAT treatment in light of this ruling. Our team of VAT specialists can provide tailored advice, ensuring that your agency remains compliant and avoids unnecessary tax liabilities. If you’re uncertain about your VAT position or facing an HMRC review, we can help you navigate these complex issues with confidence.
At Apex Accountants, we support employment agencies, care providers, and healthcare staffing firms with all aspects of VAT compliance. Our team will assess your contracts, invoicing structure, and operational model to confirm the correct VAT treatment for healthcare staffing in line with current legislation.
If you are facing an HMRC review, unsure about your VAT position, or need to challenge a tax decision, we offer practical guidance tailored to your business model. From preventing costly errors to representing you in disputes, we are here to protect your interests.
Contact us today to get expert VAT advice that keeps your business compliant.
From 1 May 2026, the UK VAT road fuel scale charges change to cover the period to 30 April 2027....
Two UK brothers were recently convicted for abusing the government’s film tax relief scheme. Between 2011 and 2015 they submitted...
In a 2026 tax appeal, the First-tier Tribunal (Tax) upheld HMRC’s view that a written-off director’s loan triggers an income...
Recent headlines cite official UK data showing that HMRC spent “£186 million” enforcing the loan charge. The loan charge enforcement...
The position is now much clearer. Retail access to certain crypto exchange-traded notes (crypto ETNs) in an IFISA was reopened...
The VAT payroll fraud case in brief On 21 April 2026, a Scottish court case ended with four prison sentences...
Slow adoption despite clear government deadlines HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) achieved a major milestone on 6 April 2026, when...
A recent case in Shetland has put the spotlight on VAT fraud and confiscation orders in the UK. A businessman...
Since April 2025, the UK government has abolished the Furnished Holiday Lettings (FHL) tax regime, aligning short-term rental profits with...
A cautionary tale of unpaid taxes In mid-April 2026, the Insolvency Service disqualified Alex Shorthose from serving as a director...