Category: Resources

Buying two or more homes together can trigger special stamp duty and property transaction tax rules across the UK. The rules vary between England and Northern Ireland (SDLT), Wales (LTT), and Scotland (LBTT). Understanding the available tax reliefs for multi-property investment can help buyers reduce unnecessary tax costs and structure purchases more efficiently.

One of the biggest recent changes is the abolition of Multiple Dwellings Relief (MDR) in England from 1 June 2024. MDR previously allowed buyers to average the value of multiple properties to reduce tax. Contracts exchanged by 6 March 2024 may still qualify if completion takes place later.

Today, residential buyers in England generally pay the standard SDLT rates plus the additional property surcharge, currently 5%, on each property.

Tax Reliefs For Multi-Property Investment

England and Northern Ireland (SDLT)

SDLT in England and Northern Ireland is charged in bands. For non-first-time buyers, the rate starts at 0% on the first £250,000 and increases progressively.

Including the 5% additional property surcharge, the highest residential rate can reach 17% on large purchases.

Previous Multiple Dwellings Relief (MDR)

Under the former MDR rules, buyers purchasing two or more homes in one transaction could calculate tax based on the average price per dwelling rather than the total price. This often reduced the overall SDLT liability significantly.

Example of MDR Before Abolition

This was possible because of the former “1% minimum rule”.

However, MDR no longer applies to new transactions after 1 June 2024.

Get Free Consultation

Call Anytime 0203 883 4777

Get Free Consultation

The 6+ Homes Rule in England and Wales

Although MDR has ended in England, an important relief still exists for bulk purchases.

If a buyer purchases six or more dwellings in one transaction, the purchase is treated as a non-residential transaction.

Benefits of the 6+ Homes Rule

For transactions from 1 June 2024 onwards in England, purchases of six or more dwellings will automatically be subject to non-residential SDLT rates.

Before 1 June 2024, buyers could choose between:

• Non-residential rates
• Residential rates with MDR

Wales (LTT)

Wales uses Land Transaction Tax (LTT) instead of SDLT.

Wales still allows Multiple Dwellings Relief, but the rules are becoming stricter.

Key Changes in Wales

From 13 February 2026:

• The minimum MDR rate increases from 1% to 3%
• Buyers purchasing 6 or more dwellings can still choose between:
  • Commercial LTT rates
  • Residential rates with MDR

Scotland (LBTT)

Scotland operates under Land and Buildings Transaction Tax (LBTT), which works differently from SDLT and LTT.

Instead of MDR, Scotland applies an Additional Dwelling Supplement (ADS) on extra residential properties.

Scotland’s Additional Dwelling Supplement (ADS)

The ADS rate is now:

• 8% of the purchase price
• Applicable to purchases of additional residential properties
• One of the highest property surcharges in the UK

However, Scotland also offers a major exemption for bulk purchases.

Scotland’s 6+ Dwellings Exemption

If a buyer purchases six or more separate dwellings in one transaction, the following benefits apply:

This rule was introduced to support larger rental investment activity in Scotland.

Get Free Consultation

Call Anytime 0203 883 4777

Get Free Consultation

Regional Comparison Table

Key Points for Property Investors

If you are buying multiple houses or flats, these rules can significantly affect your tax position.

Important Things to Consider

• MDR no longer applies to new transactions in England after June 2024
• Wales still offers MDR, but with stricter minimum tax rules
• Bulk purchases of 6 or more properties can still provide substantial tax savings
• Scotland’s 6+ dwelling exemption can remove the 8% ADS completely
• Structuring the transaction correctly is important to access reliefs

Example: Bulk Purchase in Scotland

An investor buying 6 flats in Scotland worth £1 million may qualify for commercial LBTT treatment.

Result:

• No 8% ADS applies
• Commercial LBTT rates are used instead
• Potential saving: £80,000

If those same flats were purchased separately, the investor could face an additional £80,000 ADS charge.

Filing Tax Returns Correctly

Correct filing is essential when claiming property tax relief.

Common Filing Considerations:

Incorrect filings may result in:

• Penalties
• Delays
• HMRC or Revenue authority enquiries
• Loss of relief claims

Professional advice can help reduce these risks.

How We Help Property Investors

At Apex Accountants, we support property investors with:

Stamp Duty and Property Tax Planning

• SDLT planning
• LTT advice
• LBTT guidance
• Bulk purchase structuring
• MDR and 6+ rules

Relief Claims and Compliance

• SDLT and LTT return preparation
• MDR claim support
• Compliance reviews
• Relief eligibility checks

Investment Tax Advice

• Property portfolio tax planning
• Higher-rate surcharge reviews
• Refund opportunities
• Investment structure advice

HMRC and Revenue Support

• Handling tax authority enquiries
• Appeals support
• Audit assistance
• Transaction reviews

Get Free Consultation

Call Anytime 0203 883 4777

Get Free Consultation

Conclusion

Multi-property investment transactions are treated differently across the UK, and the rules continue to change.

England has removed MDR for new transactions, Wales has tightened its relief rules, and Scotland continues to provide substantial savings via its 6+ dwellings exemption.

For investors buying multiple residential properties, understanding these rules can make a substantial difference to the final tax bill. Proper planning and accurate filing remain essential for claiming available reliefs for multi-property investment in the UK and avoiding unnecessary costs.

Two UK brothers were recently convicted for abusing the government’s film tax relief scheme. Between 2011 and 2015 they submitted bogus Film Tax Relief (FTR) and VAT claims to HMRC, falsely inflating production costs on three film projects. One brother fled the UK during the trial, was later tracked to the Czech Republic and was extradited back to Britain. Both men were found guilty of conspiring to cheat the public revenue. Each was given a multi-year prison sentence (7 years in absence) and banned from acting as a company director for 15 years. The  film tax relief fraud case highlights how UK law defines and punishes creative tax credit fraud.

How the Film Tax Relief Fraud Worked

In this case, the brothers created fictitious or foreign-based “films” to claim relief they were not entitled to. They reportedly:

• Invented or inflated costs: One claimed a film shot in the US was British, and another “film” was entirely made up. By overstating or fabricating production spending, they tried to maximise tax credits.
• Claimed VAT unlawfully: In addition to FTR, they sought large VAT repayments on inputs that either didn’t exist or weren’t actually incurred. This is illegal under the VAT Act.

Because they lied about where and how the films were made, none of their projects genuinely met the UK expenditure rules. In effect, they tried to steal around £1 million in relief and tax refunds by presenting false evidence. HMRC uncovered the scheme and pursued prosecution. (By UK standards, a conspiracy to cheat the revenue like this is a very serious offence.)

HMRC’s Film Tax Relief (FTR) Rules

The UK government offers Film Tax Relief to encourage domestic production, but it has strict conditions. Under current HMRC guidance:

• British certification: A film must be certified as British by the British Film Institute (BFI) cultural test. This means it must meet cultural content criteria or be an official co-production.
• UK expenditure threshold: At least 10% of the film’s core production costs must be spent on UK activities. (Core costs cover pre-production, principal photography and post-production.)
• Theatrical intent: The project must be intended for cinema release.

If these conditions are met, a production company can claim a corporation tax deduction equal to the lower of 80% of its total core costs or the amount of UK core costs. In practice, loss-making companies surrender the relief for a payable tax credit at 25% of their qualifying costs. For example, a film spending £1 million in qualifying UK costs could generate a £250,000 cash credit. All claims must be evidenced by detailed cost breakdowns and must include a valid BFI certificate.

Because of these rules, legitimate claims require real UK spending and paperwork. Fraudsters typically try to fake or inflate these numbers. In this creative tax credit fraud case, the brothers exploited the scheme’s mechanics – they submitted false UK cost statements and bogus project documents – which directly violated the FTR requirements.

Read: How Creative Industry Tax Reliefs Can Reduce Your Corporation Tax Bill

Legal Penalties for Tax Fraud

UK law treats tax fraud very harshly. The brothers here were convicted under common law conspiracy and VAT offences. 

Under the Sentencing Council’s revenue-fraud guidelines, serious VAT and tax credit fraud carries heavy jail terms: up to 14 years’ imprisonment for major VAT evasion (increased from 7 years for offences after Feb 2024). 

Conspiracy to cheat the public revenue (the common law offence covering tax credit fraud) can theoretically carry a life sentence, though in practice sentences are lower based on case facts.

In practice, each brother received a 7-year term for their role. Courts also typically order restitution: any fine or penalty should remove the offender’s economic benefit from the crime. This means HMRC usually seeks to recover all wrongfully claimed relief plus interest. 

Company directors involved in fraud face director disqualification: the Insolvency Service can ban them from heading any UK company for up to 15 years. In this case, both men were disqualified for that maximum period.

Beyond criminal penalties, HMRC may impose civil penalties for inaccurate claims, require repayment of the full tax credit and VAT plus interest, and potentially levy fines on top. Tax fraud conviction also typically results in large confiscation orders against assets.

Extradition and Enforcement

When a suspect flees the UK, international cooperation can force their return. Since Brexit, the UK and EU rely on the UK–EU Trade & Cooperation Agreement (TCA) for extradition. The TCA provides a streamlined extradition process (similar to the old European Arrest Warrant). In this case, UK authorities secured a TCA warrant for the fugitive. A Czech court approved the extradition order, and UK police facilitated the return.

The National Crime Agency (NCA) notes that under the TCA, extradition between the UK and EU is “streamlined” with only narrow grounds to refuse. Once a UK court orders extradition, the authorities ensure the person is sent back to face justice. This case underscores that even fleeing abroad is no guarantee of evading prosecution; digital clues and international law-enforcement cooperation made his arrest and return possible.

What Businesses Should Know

This case offers important lessons for film companies and accountants:

• Strict compliance: Always follow HMRC’s Film Tax Relief rules to the letter. Keep clear records showing actual UK expenditure and BFI certification. HMRC stresses documentation for each production.
• Beware of aggressive claims: If any percentage of UK costs or cultural tests are borderline, obtain professional advice. The scheme is generous, but it has many qualifying conditions.
• Robust enforcement: HMRC and police actively pursue fraud. Digital evidence (e.g. emails, signatures) and international warrants can expose offenders. Sentencing is severe for those caught.
• VAT checks: Claiming VAT credits requires genuine business expenses. HMRC will challenge suspicious VAT refund claims under s.72 VATA 1994 (fraudulent evasion of VAT) – also punishable by long jail terms.

In summary, UK law provides generous relief for legitimate film projects, but firms caught abusing the rules face severe consequences. Clear accounting, transparency, and following official guidance are essential to avoid legal risk.

Also Read: Financial Planning for the Entertainment Industry for Long-Term Creative Success

How We Help Creative Businesses in UK

At Apex Accountants, we help media and creative businesses navigate tax relief schemes safely. Our services include:

• Film Tax Relief Advising: Ensuring your production meets all FTR criteria (BFI certification, UK expenditure thresholds, eligible costs).
• Tax Compliance Reviews: We review company records and claims before submission to HMRC, reducing the risk of disallowed claims.
• VAT Planning and Audit Support: We help clients correctly reclaim VAT on film production expenses and prepare for any HMRC enquiry.
• Investigation Response: If HMRC queries or investigations arise, our experts represent clients through the process. We liaise with authorities and prepare legal defences.
• Director Risk Management: We advise directors on legal responsibilities; if fraud is alleged, we assist with response strategies to minimise disqualification risk.

Our team stays current with UK tax law and relief updates. We speak with HMRC in your language and use our forensic accounting expertise to document genuine claims. In light of recent prosecutions, we emphasise caution: any suspicion of irregular claims is fully investigated to protect your business.

Conclusion

Tax relief schemes like FTR can benefit UK filmmakers, but only when rules are followed exactly. The recent sibling case shows that fraudulent claims trigger the full force of UK law – lengthy prison terms, fines, and professional bans. At Apex Accountants, we provide the expertise and due diligence needed to claim relief correctly and avoid costly errors or accusations.

Recent headlines cite official UK data showing that HMRC spent “£186 million” enforcing the loan charge. The loan charge enforcement costs around £31 million per year, which over six years (2019–2025) implies about £186 million. In fact, HMRC projects at least £310 million over ten years if the status quo continues. Only around 800 individuals have settled under the loan charge since April 2019, while roughly 32,000 cases remain open, with about £1.7 billion still owed. This £186 million tax clawback campaign has been a key part of HMRC’s ongoing efforts to recover unpaid taxes.

The government accepted almost all recommendations of the 2025 independent review and introduced a new settlement scheme (Finance Act 2026). Under the new terms, most eligible taxpayers will see large reductions in their liabilities (by using original tax rates, deducting fees, waiving interest and inheritance tax, etc.). Flexible 5–7 year payment plans are now available, and normal lending or selling of personal assets is not required.

Loan Charge Enforcement 

Official sources provide these key numbers on the loan charge (a tax on certain undeclared “loan” schemes):

These data are drawn from HMRC and Treasury reports. For example, HMRC’s 2025 review states only ~800 individuals have settled on loan charge terms, versus ~32,000 still owing. The outstanding tax ($\sim£1.7bn$) and enforcement cost (£31m/yr) are official. Separately, HM Treasury reported that from 2016–2023 about 15,300 individuals and 6,600 employers settled any DR schemes (not just the loan charge), yielding £3.9bn total (about 80% of that from employers).

Get Free Consultation

Call Anytime 0203 883 4777

Get Free Consultation

Interpreting the £186 Million Tax Clawback Campaign

We should be clear: the £186m appears to be a back-of-envelope total. HMRC’s own estimate is £31m per year on loan-charge work. Since the charge began in April 2019, six years of enforcement would cost roughly £186m (6×£31m). By extension, the ten-year cost hits at least £310m. None of these numbers is “new spending”; they reflect ongoing HMRC tax compliance efforts. Official language puts it this way: “over [a] ten-year period, on current estimates, HMRC will spend at least £310m if the current impasse were to continue. ”.

For context, the loan charge was projected to affect around 50,000 individuals and 10,000 companies at the start. With 32,000 people still unresolved, the UK ends up spending a lot per case. The high figure also reflects that HMRC continued to work on these cases despite criticism: the 2019 review noted that “very few” scheme promoters have been penalised, pushing the burden onto thousands of users.

Why loan charge enforcement has been so costly

Several official reasons emerge:

• Large backlog: Only ~800 individuals have settled under the loan charge since 2019, yet ~32,000 cases remain open. The unresolved liabilities total about £1.7bn. HMRC must process each case, often repeatedly, so costs accumulate.
• Small cases vs large debt: Over 73% of the unresolved cases owe less than £50,000 each, but these small debts account for only 22% of the total tax due. In contrast, the largest 1% of cases (owing £500k+) account for 19% of the tax. This imbalance means many low-value cases consume enforcement resources, while a few big debts dominate the total.
• Uncertainty and delay: About 26% of those with loan-charge cases will be 65 or older within 5 years. Such cases can delay collections (due to retirements, insolvencies or death). Meanwhile, taxpayers who decline HMRC’s terms may appeal: HMRC itself notes that going to tribunal “could take several years” and add legal costs. Such an approach prolongs the process for both sides.
• Complexity: HMRC’s calculations and case handling were often slow and opaque. Over time, HMRC had to repeatedly work through old records, sometimes reopening tax years. Every reopening or inquiry costs staff time.
• Policy design: The loan charge was highly controversial (see Commons Library briefing). Early on, HMRC encouraged taxpayers to settle under old terms (with interest/penalty waivers) if done by Sept 2020, but many did not. Any remaining cases meant HMRC stayed in enforcement mode, accumulating costs.

These factors combine to explain why compliance costs were so high. Official data do not show any needless waste – rather, they reflect a deliberate, extended crackdown on a difficult problem.

Get Free Consultation

Call Anytime 0203 883 4777

Get Free Consultation

Changes after the 2025 review

In Autumn 2025, the government accepted most recommendations of the loan charge review and enacted major changes (Finance Act 2026). Key points (from official guidance) include:

• Scope narrowed: Only loans made from 9 December 2010 onwards are charged. Any loans before 6 April 2016 are out if they were fully disclosed to HMRC. This change removes many older cases from scope.
• Lower tax rates: The new settlement bases the tax on the original years’ rates, not the higher 2019 rates. This alone reduces many bills significantly.
• Fee and flat reductions: Each taxpayer gets a discount for any promoter fees they paid (up to £10,000 per year). All taxpayers then get an additional £5,000 reduction, which can bring many liabilities to zero.
• No late interest: All late payment interest on the loan charge is wiped out in the new calculation (roughly a 20% cut on the original amount).
• Cap on total reduction: For any one person, the total tax reduction can’t exceed £70,000.
• Inheritance tax written off: Any IHT due to these loan schemes is cancelled.
• Penalties waived: Standard penalties will not apply as long as taxpayers come forward under the scheme.
• Payment terms: If you cannot pay immediately, you can opt to pay the new reduced amount over 5 years without affordability checks. HMRC will also offer up to 7-year terms for lower-income cases. (HMRC will not require anyone to sell their home or touch their pension early to pay.)
• Promoters excluded: Those who promoted or sold these schemes cannot use the settlement to avoid consequences. The scheme is only for scheme users and their employers.

These changes dramatically cut most people’s bills. For example, the government notes many taxpayers could pay 50% less or nothing under the new terms. Roughly 30% of outstanding cases involve people who originally paid little or no tax on the loans, and these may now owe nothing whatsoever.

Letters explaining these changes have been sent to affected taxpayers (from Jan 2026). A detailed technical note and HMRC helplines are available to guide taxpayers through the new process.

How We Help You

At Apex Accountants, we help clients:

• Review whether your case qualifies for the loan charge or other DR rules and which settlement terms apply.
• Recalculate any tax owed under the new rules, ensuring HMRC’s offer is correct.
• Prepare the required disclosure paperwork (loan summaries, income records, etc.) for HMRC.
• Advise on setting up a time-to-pay plan and negotiate terms on your behalf.
• Assist with any refunds of overpayments or voluntary restitution claims if you paid early.
• Support you through any appeal process if needed (using formal objections or tribunals).

Our team stays fully updated on HMRC’s guidance and new legislation. We aim to maximise any available reductions and minimise stress on the taxpayer. Please contact Apex Accountants for personalised advice on your situation.

Conclusion

Official sources make clear that the loan charge compliance has been a prolonged, high-cost effort. The £186m figure comes from multiplying HMRC’s £31m/yr enforcement cost over 6 years. However, much has changed. The new settlement scheme (Budget 2025/Finance Act 2026) cuts most peoples’ bills dramatically. Late payment interest and many penalties are waived, and simple payment terms are available. Rather than a surprise “crackdown”, the latest official position emphasises resolving matters under fairer terms. For affected taxpayers, the key is to engage with the new scheme promptly. All the above figures and rules come from UK government sources, as cited – we base our advice strictly on these official facts.

FAQs on £186 Million Tax Clawback Campaign 

Q: What is the loan charge? 

It is a tax introduced in 2019 on certain unpaid ‘loan’ payments from disguised remuneration schemes. It only applies to loans outstanding on 5 April 2019. Loans before 9 December 2010 are completely out of scope now, as are loans before April 2016 if they were fully disclosed on a tax return.

Q: Do I still owe tax if I already paid something? 

Yes, if you owe under the old terms or new terms. HMRC’s new scheme will give credit for any amounts you already paid, including voluntary repayments. (Note: Payments made before 2020 to avoid a now-disallowed charge can be reclaimed under HMRC’s voluntary restitution scheme, but standard loan-charge payments count as credit toward your new liability.)

Q: Can I spread payments, and for how long? 

Yes. HMRC will accept a Time-to-Pay plan. You will never be asked to pay more than 50% of your disposable income per month. By law, you can get at least a 5-year plan (or 7-year if your income is lower). If eligible, you can often set this up online or via HMRC’s loan charge helpline. During any arrangement, you just pay what you agreed; HMRC will not insist on selling your home or tapping pensions to fund it.

Q: What if I disagree with HMRC’s amount? 

HMRC’s approach is set by strict rules (the 2020 settlement terms or the new 2026 scheme). If you think their calculation is wrong, you should provide correct figures and supporting evidence. You may have an independent review by a tribunal, but note that process can take years and add costs. It is usually better to work with HMRC on a settlement agreement, especially under the new scheme’s favourable terms.

Q: I’m worried I can’t pay. Can I avoid enforcement? 

HMRC emphasises working with people in hardship. They will offer payment plans as above, and they explicitly say they will not use extreme measures. For example, they “will not force anyone to sell their main home or access their pension early” to pay these debts. If you are struggling, contact HMRC early. If you have advisors (e.g., accountants, tax lawyers), they can also negotiate on your behalf.

Q: What happens to promoters (agents who sold the schemes)? 

The new settlement is only for taxpayers, not promoters. Promoters are ineligible for the settlement. HMRC and other authorities may pursue promoters separately. If you worked with a promoter, it’s often a good idea to mention that, but you must resolve your tax liability either way.

Q: Where can I get official help? 

HMRC guidance is on GOV.UK (search “loan charge guidance” or use the LR section of gov.uk/money-tax). There is a special loan-charge helpline (0300 322 9494). Apex Accountants can assist by explaining the rules and liaising with HMRC using the official process.

The position is now much clearer. Retail access to certain crypto exchange-traded notes (crypto ETNs) in an IFISA was reopened in late 2025, and from 6 April 2026, new ISA eligibility for those products sits in the Innovative Finance ISA rather than the standard Stocks and Shares ISA. That matters because the tax wrapper now follows the product into the IFISA.

Stratiphy and ISA

For Stratiphy, the timing is important. The official approved-managers list was updated on 1 April 2026 to show that Stratiphy’s ISA permissions now include the Innovative Finance ISA, and Stratiphy’s own site says investors can access Bitcoin and Ethereum ETNs inside its IFISA wrapper, powered by 21Shares. 

As per our expert’s perspective, the main point is simple. The investment is not direct crypto inside an ISA. It is a regulated note, held inside an ISA wrapper, with the usual ISA shelter for income and capital gains. The tax advantage is real, but the investment remains high risk and complex. 

Key takeaways of crypto ETNs in an IFISA:

• New crypto ETN ISA investing now belongs in an IFISA, unless the holding was already inside a Stocks and Shares ISA before 6 April 2026. 
• The eligible asset is the ETN itself, which the regulations define as a debt security, not direct ownership of a coin or token. 
• Stratiphy now appears to be a practical route for that structure, because its IFISA approval is on the official list and its site actively markets crypto ETNs within an IFISA wrapper. 
• The tax wrapper does not remove market risk, product risk, or the fact that crypto ETNs do not have FSCS cover. 

Get Free Consultation

Call Anytime 0203 883 4777

Get Free Consultation

The rule change

The story starts with the regulatory shift in retail access. In March 2024, FCA still kept the retail ban in place, even while allowing recognised exchanges to develop a listed market for professional investors. That changed on 8 October 2025, when retail consumers were allowed to access certain crypto ETNs, provided they were on the Official List and admitted to trading on a UK recognised investment exchange. 

The tax treatment then moved again. The 2026 ISA amendment regulations, which took effect on 6 April 2026, defined a UK cryptoasset exchange traded note in law and made it a qualifying IFISA investment. At the same time, the rules removed it from new Stocks and Shares ISA eligibility, while allowing older holdings already in Stocks and Shares ISAs to remain there. 

This is why the current market feels narrow rather than wide open. The legal route exists, but it only works if a provider can offer an IFISA and has the right permissions and product set-up to distribute retail-accessible crypto ETNs. Official ISA manager approval is therefore part of the commercial story, not just a back-office detail. 

How ETNs fit inside an IFISA

An Innovative Finance ISA is no longer just a peer-to-peer lending wrapper. GOV.UK now lists four broad categories that can sit inside an IFISA: peer-to-peer loans, crowdfunding debentures, certain less-liquid funds, and cryptoasset exchange traded notes. That is the rule change which makes the current structure possible. 

The legal definition matters. A UK cryptoasset exchange-traded note is now defined as a debt security traded on a UK recognised investment exchange, with no periodic coupon payments. and a return that tracks an unregulated, transferable cryptoasset minus fees. In other words, the ISA-eligible asset is the listed note. It is not direct custody of Bitcoin or Ether inside the wrapper. 

That distinction answers one of the biggest investor questions. The route back into “tax-free crypto” is really a route into a tax-sheltered security that references crypto. Stratiphy’s own wording makes that practical point clearly: it offers Bitcoin and Ethereum ETNs in an IFISA wrapper and frames the product as crypto exposure without wallets or exchanges. Stratiphy also states that brokerage and custody services are provided through WealthKernel. 

Why Stratiphy matters now

The official update is recent. The approved ISA manager list was updated on 1 April 2026, and the recent changes section records that Stratiphy Limited’s components were updated to include the Innovative Finance ISA. In the detailed register, Stratiphy is listed with both Stocks and Shares and Innovative Finance ISA components under reference Z2096 and FCA reference 976267. 

That provider-level change lines up with the wider legal changes. On its own site, Stratiphy states that investors can access Bitcoin and Ethereum ETNs within its IFISA wrapper, and that the crypto offer is powered by 21Shares. Its own materials also state that the firm is authorised and regulated by the FCA. Separately, Companies House shows STRATIPHY LIMITED as an active private limited company. 

So the significance of Stratiphy is practical. The UK now has rules that allow new crypto ETN ISA investing through the IFISA channel, and Stratiphy is one of the providers whose official approvals and primary materials indicate that it can actually operate that route. That is what turns a rule change into a usable investor pathway. 

Get Free Consultation

Call Anytime 0203 883 4777

Get Free Consultation

Key facts at a glance

The table below pulls the current position into one place. 

How We Help Clients in UK

At Apex Accountants, we help clients make sense of the tax position around new investment structures without overcomplicating the issue.

We can support with:

• reviewing how ISA and non-ISA crypto exposure fits into your wider tax planning
• checking the reporting position on holdings outside wrappers
• helping you keep clean records for ETNs, disposals and transfers
• working alongside your financial adviser or platform where regulated investment advice is needed
• explaining the practical tax difference between direct crypto holdings and ETN exposure inside an ISA

Get Free Consultation

Call Anytime 0203 883 4777

Get Free Consultation

Conclusion

The real development here is not that direct crypto has been folded into mainstream ISA investing. It has not. What has changed is more precise: retail access to certain listed crypto ETNs is open again, and from 6 April 2026 the main tax wrapper for new ISA purchases of those products is the Innovative Finance ISA. 

Stratiphy matters because its approvals now line up with that rulebook. The official ISA manager list indicates that it has IFISA capability, and its own platform materials show a live ETN-based crypto offer within that wrapper. For investors, that creates a cleaner route to tax-sheltered exposure. It does not reduce the fact that the product remains complex, high risk, and outside FSCS cover. 

FAQs About Tax-Free Crypto

Can I buy actual Bitcoin or Ether in an IFISA?

No. The rules currently allow UK crypto-asset exchange-traded notes inside an IFISA. The ISA-eligible asset is the note itself, not direct coin ownership. Stratiphy’s own materials also describe the offer as ETN-based exposure rather than wallet-based ownership. 

Can I still buy crypto ETNs in a Stocks and Shares ISA?

This will not be treated as a new holding after 6 April 2026. GOV.UK now states that cryptoasset exchange-traded notes cannot be held in a Stocks and Shares ISA unless they were already there before that date. 

Can I move crypto ETNs I already hold outside an ISA into an IFISA?

This does not involve transferring the existing investment in specie. GOV.UK’s ISA guidance states that you cannot transfer arrangements or investments you already hold into an IFISA. 

Can I transfer an existing ISA to a new manager who offers an IFISA?

Yes, ISA transfers are allowed, but they must be done through the formal transfer process with the new manager. The rules also say you cannot preserve ISA status by closing the old ISA and paying the proceeds into a new one yourself. 

Will the ISA wrapper protect me if the investment falls in value?

No. The wrapper protects tax treatment, not investment outcomes. The official approved-managers list states that ISA eligibility does not guarantee returns or protect against losses, and the FCA states that cETNs do not have FSCS cover. 

Will I need to pass investor checks before buying?

In most cases, yes. The FCA says firms offering cETNs to retail consumers must use robust appropriateness assessments, client categorisation, cooling-off periods, and clear risk warnings, alongside wider Consumer Duty obligations.

A cautionary tale of unpaid taxes

In mid-April 2026, the Insolvency Service disqualified Alex Shorthose from serving as a director for six years after his two fire alarm companies accumulated over £300,000 in unpaid VAT and PAYE while he withdrew almost £400,000. This case underlines the importance of tax compliance for UK businesses, which is critical for avoiding significant legal and financial repercussions. Proper VAT compliance, including VAT registration services for businesses, is essential for avoiding situations like the one in the Burton case where HMRC received a fraction of what was owed. Instead of closing his first firm and paying creditors, he started another and repeated the pattern—a tactic the Insolvency Service labelled abusive phoenixism.

Understanding Abusive Phoenixism and VAT Registration Services for Businesses

Phoenixism refers to a company that emerges from the ruins of an insolvent predecessor. Under Insolvency Service guidance, it becomes abusive when directors use successive firms to avoid paying debts. Although a legitimate pre-pack administration is feasible, the law prohibits reusing the same or a similar name for five years.

Shorthose’s strategy fell squarely in this category: he kept trading under similar names, failed to pay creditors and extracted significant sums for himself. The investigators described his behaviour as a cynical attempt to gain an unfair advantage over honest competitors, and the HMRC stressed that deliberate tax evasion would be pursued.

Get Free Consultation

Call Anytime 0203 883 4777

Get Free Consultation

Tax duties and consequences

The rules on VAT and payroll taxes are straightforward. Businesses that exceed the VAT threshold must register and file VAT returns. That’s where VAT registration services for businesses can help ensure compliance and avoid costly mistakes. Since January 2023, late payment interest is charged from the day a VAT payment is overdue, with penalties triggered if tax remains unpaid after 15 days. Interest is calculated at the Bank of England base rate plus four percentage points.

For PAYE payroll management for directors, employers must register if any employee earns £96 or more a week, ensuring they deduct income tax and National Insurance, report pay on or before each payday, and make timely payments to HMRC. HMRC treats non‑payment as unfit conduct; directors who fail to meet these Duties or allow an insolvent company to continue trading may risk disqualification. Disqualified directors may be banned for up to 15 years and face fines or imprisonment for breaches.

Lessons for directors and owner‑managers

The Burton case holds valuable lessons:

• Separate business and personal funds. Shorthose withdrew almost £400,000 while his companies were insolvent, breaching duties.
• Keep records and file them on time. Unpaid VAT and PAYE often stem from poor bookkeeping and late filings.
• Engage HMRC early. Time‑to‑Pay arrangements are more likely when a business contacts HMRC before debts spiral.
• Know the phoenix rules. Re‑using a company name after liquidation is restricted, and non-payment of tax can lead to disqualification.

Wider implications for UK businesses

The case has wider significance. A new abusive phoenixism taskforce signals a tougher stance on directors who use successive companies to avoid tax. Increasing scrutiny surrounds PAYE payroll management for directors, and sectors with high turnover must ensure full compliance to avoid disqualification and penalties. Sectors with transient workforces, such as construction and recruitment, face greater scrutiny, and joint liability rules introduced in April 2026 hold agencies accountable for unpaid PAYE.

The message is clear: VAT and payroll taxes fund public services and are not optional. Directors who divert these funds for personal gain undermine trust in limited liability and risk severe penalties. Compliance protects not only a business’s licence to operate but also its reputation.

How Apex Accountants & Tax Advisors can help

Apex Accountants & Tax Advisors ensures your business stays compliant and avoids mistakes like those in the Burton case. Our services include:

• VAT Registration & Returns: Timely registration and submissions to meet tax obligations.
• Payroll Management: Handling PAYE, National Insurance deductions, and reporting to HMRC.
• Tax Payment Scheduling: Avoiding late-payment interest with proactive scheduling.
• Time to Pay Negotiations: Helping businesses manage cash flow with HMRC arrangements.
• Phoenixism & Insolvency Advice: Guiding businesses through restructuring and insolvency issues.
• Director’s Duties Training: Ensuring directors understand their legal responsibilities.
• Internal Controls: Implementing systems to ensure accurate tax reporting and payment.

Contact Apex Accountants today for a confidential consultation and let us help you navigate tax compliance and protect your business.

Get Free Consultation

Call Anytime 0203 883 4777

Get Free Consultation

Frequently asked questions

What has happened in the Burton case involving fire alarms?

The Insolvency Service banned Alex Shorthose from acting as a director for six years after his two companies accumulated more than £327,000 in unpaid VAT and PAYE while he withdrew almost £400,000.

Is phoenixing illegal? 

Setting up a new company after insolvency is not in itself unlawful. It becomes abusive phoenixism when directors use successive companies to avoid debts.

What are the consequences of not paying VAT on time?

For VAT periods starting after 1 January 2023, HMRC charges late‑payment interest from the first day a payment is overdue and adds a penalty if the tax remains unpaid after 15 days.

When must I operate PAYE?

Employers must register for PAYE if any employee earns at least £96 a week and must deduct tax and National Insurance, report wages to HMRC on or before payday, and pay HMRC monthly or quarterly.

The UK’s new packaging EPR rules (often called the “packaging tax”) took effect on 1 January 2025. Any company with turnover over £1 million and supplying more than 25 tonnes of packaging per year must register, report and pay disposal fees. The fees fund local recycling: PackUK, the government-appointed scheme administrator, collects payments from producers and pays local councils to process packaging waste. 

Large UK firms may face bills in the millions – for example, Vinarchy UK (a leading wine distributor) reported multi‑million‑pound EPR costs for 2025. Companies must meet quarterly reporting deadlines or face penalties. This article explains the rules, key dates, fee calculations and penalties under the UK Packaging EPR scheme and how businesses can comply.

What is the UK packaging “tax” (EPR)?

• The UK packaging EPR scheme was introduced by the Producer Responsibility Obligations (Packaging Waste) Regulations 2024, which came into force on 1 January 2025.
• It’s not a traditional tax but an Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) system. Producers (companies that supply packaged goods) must fund the cost of collecting and recycling packaging waste. In practice, businesses pay “disposal fees” based on the weight and material of packaging they place on the UK market.
• PackUK (a DEFRA-run body) was appointed as the scheme administrator, formally launching on 21 Jan 2025. PackUK sets the per-tonne fees, issues annual Notices of Liability, collects payments, and passes funds to local authorities.

Get Free Consultation

Call Anytime 0203 883 4777

Get Free Consultation

Who must register and report?

Thresholds: 

Businesses must comply if in the previous year they had UK turnover >£1 million and placed more than 25 tonnes of packaging on the UK market. (A “producer” is any company that manufactures, imports or packs goods under its own brand, places goods in packaging, or supplies packaging to another company.)

Small vs Large producers: 

From 2025, those with a turnover of £1–2m and 25–50t of packaging are classed as small producers, while those with a turnover of ≥£2m and >50t of packaging are large producers. Both categories must report data; large producers pay higher fees.

Exemptions: 

Charities are exempt from EPR fees. Some packaging may also be excluded (e.g., fully reusable packaging or packaging exported from the UK).

Registering: 

Affected businesses had to register via the government portal (RPD service)—large organisations in July 2023 and small ones in January 2024—and submit biannual packaging data.

How are the fees calculated and paid?

Notices of Liability (NoL): 

Each spring, after data is submitted, PackUK issues a Notice of Liability stating how much must be paid. This “bill” is based on the annual weight of each category of “household” packaging reported for the previous year. (For 2025 fees, packaging data from calendar year 2024 is used.)

Rates: 

Fees are set per material (e.g., plastic, glass, cardboard). For example, roughly speaking, Year 1 rates were on the order of £200–£485 per tonne depending on material type (PackUK publishes detailed rates). 

The total liability = (tonnes of each material) × (fee per tonne). This covers the full costs of collection and recycling.

Payment schedule

PackUK usually allows payment by direct debit over up to four quarterly instalments. Producers receive the NoL (usually October each year) and then pay quarterly amounts. Final payment is due within ~50 days of the notice (and 50 days after each subsequent invoice).

2025 Year‐1 update:

 In Feb 2026 the government confirmed no change to Year 1 fees despite data resubmissions – the Treasury covered a funding shortfall so local authorities received the full promised funding. In effect, producers’ Year 1 rates stayed as originally issued.

Get Free Consultation

Call Anytime 0203 883 4777

Get Free Consultation

Vinarchy UK and £8 Million Packaging Tax 

High costs for big producers: 

UK EPR fees can run to many millions for large companies. In fact, Vinarchy UK – the merged Accolade/Pernod Ricard wine business – disclosed an ~£8 million EPR charge for its 2025 financial year (30 June 2025) when accounting for packaging waste. This one-off cost turned what would have been a profit into a loss.

Illustration: 

To put the proposal in context, the scheme is expected to raise about £1.4 billion in 2025/26 for councils. Vinarchy’s £8m is just a fraction of that national total, reflecting its share of the UK packaging market. Smaller firms will pay proportionally less.

Budgeting: 

Companies should plan for these costs. EPR fees are essentially a waste-disposal liability, so budgeting for extra several-percent costs on packaging-heavy products is prudent.

Penalties and enforcement

PackUK penalties: 

If a producer fails to pay its disposal fees on time, PackUK can impose a variable monetary penalty (VMP). For an individual company, the fine is greater than 20% of unpaid fees, or 5% of UK turnover (for a single company). For a group registration, it can be 20% of fees or 2% of group turnover.

Process: 

PackUK first sends a “notice of intent” with the penalty grounds, allowing 28 days to respond. After considering representations, a final notice of penalty is issued, to be paid within 28 days. Penalties are suspended during any appeal.

Environment Agency: 

The Environment Agency (EA) enforces the underlying obligations—registering and reporting packaging data—but does not enforce the fee itself. In other words, PackUK handles non-payment, while the EA can intervene if a business refuses to register or report data. The EA can impose its own civil sanctions (fixed or variable fines) under the Environment Act 2021 for breaches like missing the registration deadline or filing incorrect data.

Missing deadlines: 

If a business misses the initial reporting deadlines, it may owe interest on late fees or face fines by the EA. Timely compliance is essential.

Get Free Consultation

Call Anytime 0203 883 4777

Get Free Consultation

Key facts at a glance

FAQs

What exactly is the “UK packaging tax”? 

It’s the UK packaging EPR scheme: producers must fund recycling of packaging waste. Effective Jan 2025, it shifts costs onto companies (the “polluter pays” principle).

Who has to register or report packaging? 

Any UK business with a turnover exceeding £1 million and supplying more than 25 tonnes of packaging in the prior year must register, report data, and pay fees. Small organisations (e.g., £1–2m turnover) still report if packaging > 25T.

How are fees worked out, and when do I pay? 

After you report last year’s packaging volumes, PackUK issues a bill. Fees equal the weight (in tonnes) of each type of packaging you supplied multiplied by set per‑tonne rates. The Notice of Liability (issued in October for Year 1) is payable by direct debit in instalments, typically due within ~50 days of issue.

What if we fail to comply or pay? 

Non-compliance can be costly. PackUK can fine up to 20% of the unpaid fees (or 5% of your turnover). The Environment Agency can also sanction failures to register or submit data. It’s important to register on time, report accurately, and meet payment deadlines.

Are any companies exempt? 

Yes. Charities are exempt from both the obligations and fees. Packaging that is reused (and meets certain conditions) or exported may not count toward your total. Full details are in gov.uk guidance, but in practice most commercial producers (especially large ones) will be liable.

How We Help Businesses Navigate Packaging Tax in UK

At Apex Accountants, we help businesses navigate these new obligations. Our services include:

• EPR Compliance Review: We assess whether your business meets the turnover/packaging thresholds.
• Registration & Reporting: Our experts assist with PackUK/RPD portal registration and prepare your semi‑annual packaging data returns.
• Data Management: We track and verify packaging weights by material to ensure accurate reporting.
• Fee Calculation: We estimate your expected disposal fees and plan cash flow for payments.
• Appeals & Queries: If you think a fee calculation or notice is wrong, we guide you through PackUK’s complaints and tribunal processes.
• Enforcement Advice: We advise on avoiding penalties (e.g., late filing fees) and liaise with regulators if issues arise.

Our specialist tax and compliance team stays on top of DEFRA guidance and Environment Agency updates. We ensure you’re fully prepared to meet packaging EPR deadlines and help minimise costs and risks.

Get Free Consultation

Call Anytime 0203 883 4777

Get Free Consultation

Conclusion

The new UK rules on packaging EPR represent a major shift for businesses that handle packaging. Companies like Vinarchy UK have already felt the impact of multi-million-pound fee liabilities. It’s vital to understand who is liable, how fees are calculated, and to meet all reporting/payment deadlines. By following the official guidance and seeking expert help, UK businesses can comply with confidence and avoid penalties under the EPR scheme.

Close companies (broadly, those controlled by five or fewer shareholders or participators) and their owners have new reporting requirements under consultation. As part of the proposed changes around reporting company payments to participators, the UK government announced in Spring 2026 that all transactions between a close company and its participators (owners or shareholders) will need to be disclosed. This initiative aims to improve tax compliance for small and owner-managed businesses. In practice, virtually all owner-managed businesses will be affected, not just those under a certain size.

What Is a Close Company and a Participator?

• Close company: By UK tax law, a close company is one “controlled by 5 or fewer participators, or by any number of participators who are directors”. In other words, most family firms and owner-managed companies are close companies. (Even many private equity-owned firms are technically close companies under this definition.)
• Participator: A participator is a person with a share or interest in the capital or income of a company – usually a shareholder or director. Banks or unrelated lenders generally don’t count.

Because participators are often the directors and shareholders, funds can move back and forth easily (for example via director loans or drawings). HMRC’s concern is that these transactions may blur the line between company and personal finances, leading to missed tax.

Get Free Consultation

Call Anytime 0203 883 4777

Get Free Consultation

Why the Change? Tackling the Tax Gap

HMRC’s tax consultation highlights that the small-business corporation tax gap has risen recently. 

Poor record-keeping and sometimes deliberate tax avoidance in close companies contribute to this gap. Current rules classify any loan or benefit taken by a participator from the company, which is not a normal salary or dividend, under the “loans to participators” regime (section 455 of the Corporation Tax Act). If companies fail to repay loans within 9 months of year-end, the regime can trigger additional tax or penalties. But apart from this loan charge, there is no single reporting regime for other payments. Companies simply record these transactions in their accounts and tax returns without routine HMRC oversight.

The new proposals aim to plug that gap. By mandating that close companies report all payments or transfers to participators, HMRC can cross-check company records against personal tax returns. The expectation is that companies and directors will keep better books and pay any due tax on earnings or benefits from the company. HMRC states that the measure aims to guarantee the payment of the correct tax amount and minimise errors or evasions.

Proposed Requirements For Reporting Company Payments to Participators

Under the current consultation (open 19 March–10 June 2026), HMRC is considering requiring detailed reporting of every transaction between a close company and each participant. This would include, for example:

• All payments: Cash or bank payments to participators (e.g., drawings or director loans).
• Asset sales/purchases: If a participator sells assets to the company or buys company assets, those transactions must be reported.
• Dividends and distributions: All dividends, bonuses, or other profit distributions paid to participators.
• Any transfer of value: Essentially any benefit or value that passes from the company to a participator (e.g., interest-free loans, gifts, asset transfers).

At a high level, HMRC says the report would need who (which participator), how much, and when each transaction occurred. 

For example, an entry might show: “Director John Smith, £5,000 salary advance, 15 November 2026.” HMRC may also ask for identifiers (like National Insurance numbers) to match personal tax records. (Any payments already reported through payroll or RTI – such as normal salaries – likely wouldn’t need separate reporting, as they’re already tracked.)

How and When to Report

The exact filing mechanism is not decided. HMRC’s current thinking is to link the process to the existing Company Tax Return (CT600). One idea is an annual reporting cycle: updates or new supplementary pages (akin to the old CT600A for loans) could be added to the CT600, or a bespoke digital portal could be provided. HMRC specifically says it does not want to impose undue burdens, so an annual report with the CT600 is likely preferred.

Key points on timing:

• Reporting frequency: Probably annual, matching each accounting period’s tax return. HMRC is open to more frequent or real-time reporting if practical, but annual is the starting assumption.
• Deadline: If tied to the CT600, the deadline would be nine months after the period end (the normal corporation tax return deadline) or as otherwise set by HMRC.
• Transitional dates: The consultation suggests rules will come into force after responses are reviewed – likely in a future Finance Act. We expect new reporting to apply to accounting periods ending after legislation is enacted. (The consultation runs until June 2026, so changes might appear in late 2026 or 2027 budgets.)

Get Free Consultation

Call Anytime 0203 883 4777

Get Free Consultation

What to Do Now

Even before any formal change, companies should start keeping clear records of all transactions with participators: track director’s loan accounts, asset dealings, dividends, etc. Review your accounting software: HMRC is asking if common tax software can already track loans and shareholder transactions. Many modern accounting packages do this, which will help when reporting starts.

Penalties and Compliance

HMRC indicates that normal corporation tax penalties will apply if the required information is missing or incorrect. This means heavy penalties could be charged for late filing or inaccuracies, just as with a late or wrong tax return. HMRC is also consulting on whether specific penalties should apply for deliberately omitted participator transactions.

In practice, that means it’s important to be accurate and thorough. Keep good records now, double-check your directors’ loan accounts and dividend records, and ensure any loan repayments or write-offs are documented (since companies can reclaim tax on repaid loans, and write-offs can trigger personal tax).

What Transactions Trigger Tax vs. Reporting

It’s helpful to distinguish taxable events from reporting requirements. Under current law, only certain transactions give rise to additional tax (e.g., loan repayments or write-offs under section 455 CTA 2010). Under the proposed rules, every transaction must be reported even if it’s already taxed (like dividends) or currently not taxed (like repaid loans). Reporting is not the same as tax liability – it just means HMRC will see everything.

Example Transactions of Tax vs. Reporting

(This table is illustrative; companies should await final guidance on exact categories.)

Next Steps and Preparation

This is a consultation stage, so rules aren’t law yet. However, the direction is clear: close companies should prepare. Here’s how to stay ahead:

• Review records: Ensure your company accounts clearly separate company funds from personal expenses. Keep detailed ledgers of any director’s loan accounts, dividends declared, and asset transactions.
• Ask your accountant: Accounting software can help. Many modern packages track loans to directors and equity payments. Make sure your system can produce a report of transactions by participator.
• Educate directors: Remind company owners that even small drawings or informal “loans” must be recorded. Going forward, always document any personal use of company assets or funds.
• Plan cash flow: In the current loan charge regime, unpaid loans trigger corporate tax charges, and write-offs trigger income tax for the director. Under the new rules, HMRC will know about all loan advances and repayments, which may accelerate scrutiny. Keep loans minimal or repay promptly if possible.
• Watch deadlines: The consultation closes on 10 June 2026. After that, HMRC will draft legislation. Once final rules are published (likely in future tax legislation), AIM to adapt for accounting periods thereafter. Your accountant should monitor updates and may respond to the consultation on your behalf.

Get Free Consultation

Call Anytime 0203 883 4777

Get Free Consultation

How We Help Businesses in UK

At Apex Accountants, we specialise in helping owner-managed businesses navigate UK tax changes. We can assist you by:

• Assessing your status: Checking whether your company is a “close company” and identifying all participators.
• Record-keeping: Advising on best practices for tracking directors’ loans, dividends, and asset transactions. We ensure your accounts and tax software capture every participator transaction clearly.
• Tax return support: Updating your CT600 filings (including any new supplementary pages like CT600A) so you report participator payments correctly. We’ll guide you on when and how to enter this data once the rules take effect.
• Compliance checks: Reviewing any loans or benefits already given to participators, and calculating any potential section 455 tax due. We can handle claims for loan repayments or reliefs when loans are repaid.
• Responding to HMRC: If HMRC queries your participator transactions, we can liaise with them on your behalf. We also stay on top of HMRC consultations and can help draft responses to protect your interests.

Our team keeps abreast of HMRC’s transformation roadmap and tax consultations. We will assist you in meeting the new reporting requirements seamlessly.

If you need any clarification about these changes or need a review of your records, please contact Apex Accountants. We’ll provide personalised advice so you’re fully prepared for the new participator reporting framework.

FAQs

Who is required to report transactions between a close company and its participators?

Any close company, large or small, regardless of turnover. Even companies with only one director or shareholder are close companies.

Which individuals or entities qualify as participators for reporting purposes?

All persons or entities who have shares or are connected to shares (including some partnerships or trusts). Corporate participators (e.g., a parent company) are included.

Are there any exemptions from reporting company payments to participators?

Items already reported through payroll (RTI) are expected to be exempt (e.g., a director’s regular pay). HMRC is asking if any other categories should be excluded, but currently none are specified beyond payroll.

How should repayments or write-offs of loans to participators be reported?

If a participator repays a loan, the company will report the repayment. If the company writes off or releases a loan, it should also report the write-off (so HMRC can check if the personal tax on that write-off is due).