
Most businesses ask this as a yes-or-no question, but UK VAT does not work that neatly. VAT on transaction fees can be recoverable, partly recoverable, or blocked altogether, depending on who received the service, what the transaction was for, and whether the cost links to taxable business activity rather than a passive investment or an exempt share sale.
| Deal situation | Usual VAT outcome |
| A trading company issues new shares to raise funds for its taxable business | Often recoverable under the normal rules, because a new share issue is not a VAT supply in itself. If the issue supports economic activity, the related VAT can be input tax, subject to partial exemption if relevant. |
| A passive holding company buys shares to earn dividends or sell later for gain | Usually not recoverable. Pure shareholding for dividends or capital growth is treated as investment activity, not taxable business activity. |
| A holding company buys a subsidiary and supplies genuine management services for real consideration | Often recoverable, but only if the holding company is the recipient of the adviser services, carries on economic activity, and makes taxable supplies. Partial exemption can still reduce the claim. |
| An acquisition is a direct extension of an existing taxable trade | Often recoverable. Such as buying a competitor, a key supplier, a key customer, or a property-owning subsidiary from which the buyer intends to trade. |
| A business sells existing shares | Usually restricted or blocked, because the sale of existing shares is normally an exempt supply. If the share sale is only incidental to the wider business, there are special partial exemption rules rather than an automatic full block. |
| The target company incurs vendor due diligence costs | Recovery can be possible for the target if the target is the actual recipient of the services and they were received for its own business. |
| A deal aborts after fees have been incurred | Recovery can still be possible if there is genuine, objective evidence of an intention to make taxable supplies. Failed projects do not automatically destroy recovery. |
Three questions usually decide the result.
That is why labels like “legal fee”, “corporate finance fee” or “due diligence fee” do not settle the point on their own. The same type of cost can be recoverable in one structure and blocked in another, simply because the underlying activity is different.
A second point is often missed: the invoice trail matters. Whether the claimant contracted for the service, was invoiced, paid for it, and made use of it, while general VAT record rules also require valid VAT invoices and records that support the claim.
If a business has both taxable and exempt activity, it may only recover the taxable portion unless the de minimis rules help. The current de minimis limit is £625 per month on average and no more than half of the total input tax, with an in-period check and a year-end review.
Read: Court of Appeal ruling puts VAT on education grants under scrutiny
A holding company does not get recovery just because it owns subsidiaries. If it only holds shares, receives dividends and hopes for a later sale, that is investment activity, and the VAT on acquisition costs is normally not recoverable.
The position improves where the holding company buys the subsidiary to make taxable management services for consideration. The acquisition costs of such a holding company are part of its general overheads, so the VAT can be deductible only if the holding company receives the adviser services and makes taxable supplies.
A practical observation here is that vague plans do not help much. If the structure only contemplates charging the subsidiary “at some point later” or only if profits allow, that is weak; official case summaries and guidance both stress the need for genuine, priced services and real consideration.
Not every acquisition needs a separate management charge to support recovery. Share acquisition can sometimes be a direct, continuous and necessary extension of an existing taxable trade, such as buying a competitor, a key supplier, a key customer, or a property-owning subsidiary from which the buyer plans to trade.
That is a useful point in real deals. If a trading business buys a company to reinforce its own trading operation, the fee can sometimes sit with the buyer’s existing taxable business rather than a standalone investment case.
A sale of existing shares is normally an exempt supply. That is why VAT on legal and advisory fees linked directly to a share disposal is usually a problem, and a wider commercial reason for the sale does not automatically fix it.
That last point matters. Selling shares to raise money for wider taxable trading does not by itself turn the disposal fees into recoverable VAT, because the immediate transaction still matters.
There is, though, an important nuance. Some disposals in a restructuring context may fall within economic activity where the disposal is a direct, permanent and necessary extension of the taxable business, but this is fact-sensitive and should never be assumed.
If the business uses the standard partial exemption method and a share sale is merely incidental to the main business, the value of that share sale should be excluded from the standard method calculation. The VAT on the related costs is then dealt with using normal attribution rules rather than by simply including the deal in the denominator and accepting the result.
If the business uses a special method, certain residual costs on incidental share sales must be apportioned by use. Costs such as:
One other point saves confusion in practice: a share sale is not a TOGC. Where a limited company changes hands by way of a share transfer, the assets remain owned by the company, so there is no asset transfer to which TOGC rules apply.
A new share issue is treated differently from a sale of existing shares. The issue of new shares is not a supply for VAT purposes, and related VAT can be recoverable to the extent the issuer’s business generates taxable supplies.
On the seller side, the target company’s own fees can sometimes be overlooked. Vendor due diligence and similar costs incurred by the target may be deductible where:
Aborted deals are not automatically lost causes either. If there was genuine objective evidence that the business intended to make taxable supplies, preparatory VAT can still be recoverable even where the project fails before those supplies are made.
A Must Read: Everything About VAT Return Deadlines in the UK
Also check whether there is actually any VAT on the adviser bill in the first place.
The biggest practical point is timing. VAT attribution is based on how the service is used, or intended to be used, when the service is received, so sloppy structuring at the start of the deal is hard to repair later.
In real transactions, the weak spot is often not the technical rule. It is the evidence pack: the engagement letter is in one company’s name, the invoice is sent to another, and the payment comes from a third. That makes it much harder to show who really bought and used the service.
| Document or step | Why it matters |
| Engagement letter in the right entity’s name | Helps show which business contracted for the service and was the recipient. |
| VAT invoice in that same entity’s name | A recoverable claim needs a valid VAT invoice and records that support it. |
| Payment trail | Official guidance on recipient status looks at who paid for the service as well as who contracted and who used it. |
| Board minutes, deal papers and business plan | These can provide objective evidence of intended taxable supplies, especially where the deal never completes or charges begin later. |
| Management services agreement with a real charging model | Helps show that services are genuine, for consideration, and more than nominal. |
| Actual management invoices after completion | Strong evidence that the structure reflected real taxable activity rather than a vague future intention. |
| Partial exemption workings | Essential where deal fees support both taxable and exempt activity, including share sales or exempt lending. |
| Six-year retention of VAT records | VAT records generally need to be kept for at least six years. |
A final but important point is VAT grouping. Joining a VAT group does not automatically create recovery, and it does not turn passive investment activity into taxable business activity.
The most common failure point is assuming that “commercial purpose” is enough. It is not enough to say the deal helped the group overall; what matters is the VAT link between the cost and taxable outputs.
Other problem areas come up again and again:
A smaller but still important trap is “stewardship” or group overhead costs. Some group audit, legal, regulatory, brand defence and bid defence costs may really belong to the group as a whole, even if the holding company receives the invoice for convenience.
At Apex Accountants, we keep this area practical. Our focus is not just on whether VAT looks reclaimable in principle but on whether the contract, invoice trail, management model and partial exemption position actually support the claim.
We help clients with:
VAT recovery on deal fees is possible, but it is rarely automatic. The strongest claims usually involve one of two positions: the fee sits inside an existing taxable business, or the acquiring company is carrying on real taxable activity and can prove it with proper documents and real charges.
Claims usually fail for the opposite reasons. The structure is really an investment; the fee links to an exempt share sale, the wrong entity received the service, or the paperwork does not match the story the business wants to tell.
Yes, but not just because it is a holding company. Recovery normally depends on the company being the recipient of the adviser services, carrying on economic activity, and making taxable supplies such as genuine management services for consideration.
That usually points the wrong way. Simply holding shares for dividends or a later capital gain as investment activity, not taxable business activity.
Yes. The services need to be genuine, provided for consideration that is more than nominal, and not left as a vague future idea that may or may not be billed later.
In practice, yes, that is the safest position. Whether the claimant contracted for the service, was invoiced, paid for it and used it, and normal VAT rules also require valid VAT invoices and records to support the claim.
No. Joining a VAT group does not automatically create recovery and does not turn passive investment activity into taxable business activity.
Usually not in full, because the sale of existing shares is normally an exempt supply. If the share sale is only incidental to the wider business, special partial exemption rules may soften the effect, but that is not the same as an automatic full reclaim.
Sometimes. If the exempt input tax is no more than £625 per month on average and no more than half of the total input tax, the de minimis rules can allow full recovery, but the position must still be reviewed at year-end.
It can if the target is the real recipient of the services and the services were received for the purposes of the target’s own business.
A failed deal does not automatically kill the claim. Where there was genuine, objective evidence of an intention to make taxable supplies, preparatory VAT can still be recoverable even if the business never reaches the point of making those supplies.
Potentially, yes. For services, normally a six-month lookback before registration, while goods can go back four years, but only where the costs were bought for the taxable business that is now registered.
Since the private school VAT change, effective 1 January 2025, private school tuition and boarding in the UK have been...
A temporary VAT cut of 5% will apply from 25 June 2026 to 1 September 2026 on certain children’s meals,...
Most businesses ask this as a yes-or-no question, but UK VAT does not work that neatly. VAT on transaction fees...
In HMRC v M R Currell Ltd [2026] EWCA Civ 445, the Court of Appeal held that an £800,000 payment...
HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) has set itself an ambitious goal: by 2030, 90% of customer interactions should be digital,...
UK corporate law and HMRC guidance have long recognised that transactions between a company and its shareholders are subject to...
The UK Court of Appeal has clarified the VAT treatment of education grants, marking an important shift for schools, universities,...
Buying two or more homes together can trigger special stamp duty and property transaction tax rules across the UK. The...
Submitting a VAT return on time is one of the most important VAT responsibilities for UK businesses. A missed deadline...
HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) has adopted a significantly tougher stance on VAT investigations for large businesses recently. Investigations into...