
The UK’s Autumn Budget 2025 introduced a major tax change for the private‑hire sector. Since 2 January 2026, large ride‑hailing operators in London, such as Uber and Bolt, can no longer apply the Tour Operators’ Margin Scheme (TOMS) to their fares. This new taxi tax means they must charge 20% VAT on the full fare, not just on their margin. HM Treasury claims that this move will eliminate a tax loophole, establish fair competition for black taxi drivers, and generate approximately £700 million in revenue.
This article looks at why private hire VAT changes were introduced, how they work, and what they mean for passengers, drivers, and operators. It also explains how Apex Accountants can help your business comply with the new rules.
The Tour Operators’ Margin Scheme is a special VAT scheme designed for tour operators selling travel packages. It allows companies to pay VAT only on their profit margin rather than on the full cost of the trip, often reducing the effective VAT rate to around 4%. In recent years some large ride‑hailing firms applied the scheme to domestic private‑hire journeys. This meant they charged VAT only on their commission after paying drivers and not on the entire fare.
In London, courts have ruled that ride‑hailing operators act as principals in the supply of passenger transport, so they must collect VAT on the full fare. Outside London, operators could continue acting as agents, accounting for VAT only on their commission.
The Upper Tribunal ruled in March 2025 that operators such as Bolt could use TOMS. HMRC strongly disagreed, arguing that TOMS was never intended for domestic taxi services, and it appealed. To remove the uncertainty, the Autumn Budget legislated to exclude taxi and private‑hire journeys from TOMS.
The policy paper “Private Hire Vehicle Operators and the Change in Legislation for the Tour Operators’ Margin Scheme” sets out the details. The key points of Reeves’ private hire VAT are:
In London, private‑hire operators are legally required to act as principals when supplying journeys to passengers. Acting as principal means the company sells the entire transport service and must account for VAT on the full fare, not just its commission. Now that the new VAT rules for London taxis have taken effect, ride‑hailing firms in London must charge 20% VAT on each fare, increasing prices.
Outside London, regulations still allow operators to act as agents. If the driver is the supplier, the operator charges VAT only on its commission, and the driver pays VAT on their earnings. Most self‑employed drivers earn less than the £90,000 VAT registration threshold, so they do not charge VAT. For this reason, the “taxi tax” will mainly affect rides booked in London.
Uber has responded by rewriting driver contracts outside London so that the company acts as an agent, meaning VAT continues to apply only to its commission. As per recent reports, the new contracts make drivers contract directly with passengers, leaving Uber to add VAT solely to its commission. Because drivers seldom reach the VAT threshold, most fares outside London will avoid the 20% tax.
Official documents do not specify exactly how much fares will rise, but industry estimates provide a guide:
These estimates imply that passengers could see fare increases of roughly 15–20%. A survey indicates that 70% of passengers would reduce or stop using private‑hire services if fares increased by 20%. This suggests the VAT on taxi fares in the UK may have a noticeable effect on demand, particularly for short trips.
The Treasury expects the reform to raise around £700 million per year. Officials say the revenue will help fund priorities such as cutting the cost of living, reducing waiting lists and reducing national debt. While black cab drivers see the measure as levelling the playing field, hospitality and transport groups warn that higher fares could deter people from travelling for leisure or work. Some commentators argue that a lower VAT rate on transport would have encouraged mobility and economic activity. The debate shows the challenge of balancing tax fairness with affordability.
Apex Accountants understands how new tax rules can disrupt your business. Our team of VAT specialists can help private hire operators, taxi firms, and self-employed drivers navigate the 2026 VAT changes. We offer:
The government’s decision to close the TOMS loophole marks a major shift in VAT on online cab companies. Since 2 January 2026, large operators in London must charge 20% VAT on the full fare, bringing their tax treatment closer to that of black cabs. Outside London, operators can still act as agents, so many fares remain VAT‑free. Passengers in the capital should expect fare increases of around 15–20%, while drivers and operators must assess how the change affects their earnings and compliance obligations.
With proper planning and professional advice, businesses can adapt to the new landscape. For tailored guidance on VAT, tax planning and compliance, Apex Accountants is here to help you navigate the roads ahead.
The TOMS is a simplified VAT scheme for travel companies that buy and resell travel services. It allows firms to pay VAT on their margin (profit) rather than the full selling price. It was designed for travel packages such as holidays. Under TOMS, operators normally pay an effective VAT rate of around 4%, compared with the standard 20%.
Following court rulings, some private‑hire companies acting as principals argued that TOMS applied to domestic journeys, allowing them to pay VAT only on their commission. HMRC disagreed, stating that TOMS was never intended for domestic taxi services. The Upper Tribunal ruled in March 2025 that TOMS could apply to ride‑hailing services, prompting HM Treasury to legislate.
The exclusion from TOMS applies to journeys supplied on or after 2 January 2026. Since that date has now passed, all affected journeys are subject to the new rules.
If the private‑hire operator acts as a principal, it charges VAT on the full fare. In London, it is mandatory. If the operator is an agent, only the commission is taxed, and the driver pays VAT on their earnings. Many trips outside of London will remain VAT-free because the majority of drivers make less than the £90,000 VAT registration threshold.
Outside London, operators may continue using an agency model and pay VAT only on their commission. If operators adopt this model, fares should not increase unless the driver is VAT‑registered. However, regional authorities could tighten their licensing rules, so passengers should verify their local operator’s pricing.
Yes. The new legislation still allows TOMS to apply when the taxi journey is supplied as part of a wider travel package – for example, a hotel booking that includes a transfer. In these cases, the ride is considered ancillary to the main travel service.
Seek professional advice – Understanding VAT rules can be complex. Working with an accountant or tax advisor can help you stay compliant and minimise costs.
HM Revenue & Customs is increasing scrutiny of VAT practices across the UK construction sector as part of a wider...
A UK tax tribunal has ruled that operators of community electric-vehicle (EV) charge points may apply the 5% reduced VAT...
A recent UK tax tribunal decision in Story Terrace Limited v HMRC [2025] UKFTT 01554 (TC) has clarified how VAT...
Researchers examining global financial crime enforcement argue that recognising tax evasion as corruption could help governments hold financial criminals more...
Fresh HMRC figures have reignited an old VAT debate: whether the UK’s compulsory VAT registration threshold is creating a “cliff...
The UKDI fast-paced innovation competition has entered a new phase after the UK Ministry of Defence’s innovation unit, UK Defence...
The Court of Appeal has rejected the latest legal challenge to adding VAT on UK private school fees, confirming that...
Many sole traders and landlords are used to dealing with their tax once a year. Records are often pulled together...
Attracting and retaining skilled employees has become more challenging for UK businesses, particularly for growing companies that need to manage...
A growing number of independent schools have chosen to leave the Teachers’ Pension Scheme (TPS). Recent reporting, based on a...