
The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) recently published further detail on its views on the law in relation to cancellations and refunds during the pandemic. It remains their view that a consumer will generally be entitled to a refund when they have paid money in advance for services or goods that cannot be provided because of the coronavirus pandemic.
Given the evolving situation, the CMA has provided more detail on issues such as the difference between lockdown laws and government guidance, and their impact on cancellations and refunds.
For example, if contracts are partially affected by lockdown laws then, depending on the circumstances and the scale of the impact, consumers may be entitled to a refund or a price reduction.
Additionally, the government has issued guidance in place of, or in addition to, lockdown laws. As these are guidance and not law, whether a consumer is entitled to a refund will vary according to the specific circumstances.
For example, if a package holiday is cancelled in light of Foreign and Commonwealth Office advice against travel to the relevant country, there are specific protections which mean that consumers should be entitled to a full refund.
In other situations, it will not always be the case that a full refund is due because government guidance does not create legal restrictions and will not necessarily mean that a contract cannot be performed.
The CMA has also written to certain package travel companies involved in group trips to explain its view on when customers should be offered a refund.
This follows complaints about some package travel organisers advising customers that they are not entitled to a refund as their contract was between the company and a group, such as a school, rather than made directly with the customer. It is the CMA’s view that the Package Travel Regulations apply to these group travel packages, and that individual customers should be entitled to a refund if they have paid money in advance for a group trip that is cancelled because of the pandemic.
The CMA’s statement on consumer protection law, setting out its views, is designed to help consumers understand their rights and to help businesses treat their customers fairly. Ultimately only a court can decide how the law applies in each circumstance.
HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) has adopted a significantly tougher stance on VAT investigations for large businesses recently. Investigations into...
From 1 May 2026, the UK VAT road fuel scale charges change to cover the period to 30 April 2027....
Two UK brothers were recently convicted for abusing the government’s film tax relief scheme. Between 2011 and 2015 they submitted...
In a 2026 tax appeal, the First-tier Tribunal (Tax) upheld HMRC’s view that a written-off director’s loan triggers an income...
Recent headlines cite official UK data showing that HMRC spent “£186 million” enforcing the loan charge. The loan charge enforcement...
The position is now much clearer. Retail access to certain crypto exchange-traded notes (crypto ETNs) in an IFISA was reopened...
The VAT payroll fraud case in brief On 21 April 2026, a Scottish court case ended with four prison sentences...
Slow adoption despite clear government deadlines HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) achieved a major milestone on 6 April 2026, when...
A recent case in Shetland has put the spotlight on VAT fraud and confiscation orders in the UK. A businessman...
Since April 2025, the UK government has abolished the Furnished Holiday Lettings (FHL) tax regime, aligning short-term rental profits with...