
HMRC investigations into big businesses have become markedly longer, with many major corporate tax enquiries now stretching across several years. Freedom of Information data analysed by law firm Pinsent Masons shows that open enquiries handled by HM Revenue & Customs’ Large Business Directorate now last about 41 months – nearly three and a half years. The same analysis found that the number of active investigations into companies with annual revenue above £200 million rose from 2,031 to 2,149 in the year to March 2025. HMRC’s scrutiny of large corporations is therefore both broader and deeper, and HMRC investigations into large UK companies now have consequences for business planning, cash flow and the wider UK economy.
| Metric | Latest figure | Previous year |
| Average age of settled transfer pricing enquiries | 41.0 months | 33.1 months |
| Number of cases settled | 143 | 128 |
HM Revenue and Customs acknowledges that long-running enquiries can create uncertainty for businesses, but says there has been clear progress in reducing the time it takes to close cases recently. It also says that speed won’t sacrifice the correct tax amount. The broader picture reflects a mixed trend: while closed cases are now being resolved more quickly, many open enquiries continue to run for several years. Despite improvements in efficiency, the volume and complexity of cases prolongs the overall timeline for large-business tax investigations.
Several structural factors explain why HMRC investigations into large businesses often stretch over several years.
Many enquiries involve multinational groups with complex cross-border arrangements. Transfer pricing disputes, questions around permanent establishments, or the use of overseas subsidiaries require detailed analysis of global transactions. These cases frequently involve cooperation between multiple tax authorities and extensive documentation reviews. As a result, investigations can take considerable time to resolve.
Large-business tax cases are subject to strict internal oversight. HMRC has adopted a cautious approach following past criticism over corporate tax settlements. Major decisions must pass through several levels of review to ensure they are robust and defensible. While this strengthens accountability, it can slow the pace at which disputes move towards resolution.
The number of enquiries opened into large companies has increased in recent years, reflecting a wider rise in HMRC investigations into large UK companies. HMRC continues to prioritise large-business compliance because these companies account for a substantial share of UK tax revenues. As the volume and complexity of cases rise, investigations naturally take longer to progress through the system.
Large corporate tax enquiries often evolve into detailed technical disagreements, particularly in complex HMRC tax enquiries for large UK businesses. Companies may challenge HMRC’s interpretation of tax rules, provide additional evidence, or seek clarification through negotiation. This process can involve multiple rounds of correspondence, expert analysis, and sometimes international consultations before both sides reach agreement.
HMRC assigns a Customer Compliance Manager to major groups to maintain ongoing dialogue. In practice, however, differences in interpretation or gaps in documentation can still lead to prolonged discussions. When disagreements arise, reaching a settlement may take significant time, particularly if both parties need to revisit earlier positions.
Prolonged investigations carry several consequences for large companies:
HMRC argues that it is making progress in reducing the time taken to close enquiries and that its co‑operative compliance model remains a cornerstone of large‑business tax administration. The NAO report praises the hands‑on approach for doubling the compliance yield and reducing the long‑term tax gap. However, the public debate is shifting towards transparency and accountability. The Public Accounts Committee has launched an inquiry into tax compliance by large businesses, scrutinising how HMRC manages its caseload and whether current governance structures strike the right balance between efficiency and fairness.
The government’s 2021 Review of tax administration for large businesses recognised that timeliness is a key concern and committed to further embedding co‑operative compliance. Meanwhile, HMRC’s transfer‑pricing statistics show that staffing levels for international tax remain relatively static at 392 full‑time equivalent specialists. Unless resources increase in line with caseloads, the average age of enquiries may continue to creep upwards.
While companies cannot control HMRC’s internal processes, they can take steps to reduce the risk of drawn‑out disputes:
Navigating an HMRC investigation is both a technical and a strategic challenge. Apex Accountants & Tax Advisors support large businesses at every stage of the process. Our services include:
For tailored support and to minimise the impact of long‑running HMRC enquiries on your business, contact Apex Accountants today to arrange a confidential consultation.
What is the average duration of an HMRC investigation into large businesses?
Recent FOI data indicate that open investigations into the UK’s largest companies last around 41 months (about three and a half years). HMRC’s own statistics show that the average age of settled transfer‑pricing enquiries is also around 41 months.
Why do HMRC investigations take so long?
The main drivers are the complexity of international transactions, limited specialist resources, layered governance processes and the sheer volume of cases. Transfer‑pricing disputes require coordination with other tax authorities and often take years to resolve.
How many large‑business investigations are open?
Data from HMRC’s Large Business Directorate show that there were 2,149 open investigations at the end of the 2024‑25 year, up from 2,031 a year earlier.
Does HMRC publish data on investigation length?
HMRC publishes limited statistics. The Transfer Pricing and Diverted Profits Tax statistics report includes the average age of settled enquiries. FOI responses obtained by Pinsent Masons provide further insight into the average age of open enquiries.
How can businesses reduce the duration of an HMRC enquiry?
Companies can reduce delays by keeping comprehensive documentation, engaging proactively with HMRC through their Customer Compliance Manager, addressing queries promptly and considering advance pricing agreements for complex transfer‑pricing issues. Professional advice can help streamline the process and avoid pitfalls.
Could HMRC’s close‑contact model be extended beyond large businesses?
Yes. The NAO reports that HMRC is exploring whether to apply the Large Business Directorate’s hands‑on approach to other complex or high‑risk businesses. Medium‑sized groups should monitor developments and prepare for increased engagement with HMRC.
Slow adoption despite clear government deadlines HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) achieved a major milestone on 6 April 2026, when...
A recent case in Shetland has put the spotlight on VAT fraud and confiscation orders in the UK. A businessman...
Since April 2025, the UK government has abolished the Furnished Holiday Lettings (FHL) tax regime, aligning short-term rental profits with...
A cautionary tale of unpaid taxes In mid-April 2026, the Insolvency Service disqualified Alex Shorthose from serving as a director...
From 6 April 2026, self-employed childminders with qualifying income over £50,000 must use Making Tax Digital for Income Tax. The...
A sticky dispute that went all the way back to tribunal In late March 2026 the First‑tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)...
In a recent case in Glasgow, two restaurant owners were found guilty of carrying out nearly a £700,000 VAT fraud...
Starbucks UK’s tax credit situation highlights that sales growth does not necessarily lead to tax liabilities. Despite reporting a turnover...
The UK’s new packaging EPR rules (often called the “packaging tax”) took effect on 1 January 2025. Any company with...
Close companies (broadly, those controlled by five or fewer shareholders or participators) and their owners have new reporting requirements under...