
A recent First-tier Tribunal decision on a farm VAT penalty appeal has put a spotlight on a problem many smaller businesses recognise. Tax rules change. Yet communication can fall short.
In Julian & Anor v HMRC [2026] UKFTT 159 (TC), the tribunal cancelled a £43,438 late VAT registration penalty issued to a small island farming partnership after finding it was reasonable they did not know a key VAT change had taken effect.
The case matters far beyond farming. It highlights how “reasonable excuse” can apply where a rule change was not communicated in a way an ordinary taxpayer could spot, even when the underlying law was in place.
This guide explains what changed in the Agricultural Flat Rate Scheme (AFRS), what the tribunal decided, and what farms and rural businesses should do now.
The farming partnership operated on St Martin’s, Isles of Scilly. They used the AFRS, which lets eligible farmers charge a 4% flat rate addition on qualifying sales instead of registering for VAT in the standard way.
A reform announced at the 2020 Spring Budget took effect from 1 January 2021. It tightened the AFRS eligibility rules and introduced a clearer requirement to leave the scheme and register for VAT once turnover went beyond a set point.
The partnership’s farming turnover exceeded the new £230,000 exit threshold, but they did not notify HMRC. HMRC later issued a late registration penalty of £43,438.
Once HMRC raised the issue, the partnership registered and paid a large VAT bill within a year. The tribunal still had to decide whether the penalty should stand.
The tribunal accepted that the taxpayers had a reasonable excuse.
A key factor was how the change was communicated. The judge described the AFRS amendment as “very significant” yet effectively “hidden away” in specialist material, with limited publicity aimed at ordinary taxpayers.
That point is important. HMRC penalties for failure to notify can be cancelled where a taxpayer shows a reasonable excuse for the failure, then corrects the position without undue delay once aware.
AFRS is a VAT simplification route for farming businesses that meet the conditions.
Instead of registering for VAT and reclaiming VAT on purchases, an eligible farmer:
AFRS reduces admin, yet it is not “set and forget”. The eligibility tests matter, and they change.
HMRC’s VAT Notice confirms the key AFRS thresholds:
Once you exceed the exit threshold, you are expected to notify HMRC, leave AFRS, and register for VAT (standard VAT rules then apply).
These AFRS thresholds are separate from the general VAT registration threshold.
For most UK businesses, VAT registration becomes mandatory when taxable turnover exceeds £90,000 in a rolling 12-month period (current figure).
So a farming business might face VAT registration because:
Late VAT registration penalties can arise under Schedule 41 Finance Act 2008, which applies where a business fails to notify HMRC of liability to register.
HMRC guidance explains that you can challenge a penalty through:
In farming, cash flow can be seasonal. A five-figure penalty on top of VAT due can put real strain on working capital, especially where margins stay tight and records are not run through dedicated finance teams.
AFRS uses turnover from farming activities for the entry and exit tests.
Action steps:
A simple checklist prevents missed thresholds.
Use triggers such as:
AFRS reduces admin. It does not remove responsibility.
A farm can still become VAT-registered due to:
The tribunal gave weight to prompt corrective action once the issue came to light in this case reporting.
In real terms:
You Might Also Want to Know: Impact of the 182‑Day Let Tax Rule on Welsh Farm Businesses
“Reasonable excuse” is fact-specific. It is not automatic.
Evidence that helps:
| Topic | AFRS | Standard VAT registration |
| Admin level | Lower | Higher |
| VAT on sales | Flat rate addition (scheme rules) | Charge VAT at correct rate |
| VAT on purchases | No input VAT reclaim | Input VAT reclaim (subject to rules) |
| Key eligibility | Join < £150k, leave > £230k (farming turnover) | Must register over £90k taxable turnover |
| Common risk | Missing exit point | Rate errors, digital records, penalties |
Thresholds and scheme conditions per HMRC guidance.
At Apex Accountants, we support farms, estates, growers, and diversified rural businesses with VAT planning and compliance that fits real operations.
Our VAT support typically covers:
If you want a clear position on whether you should stay on AFRS, leave it, or register for VAT, we can review your figures and map the next steps.
The Julian tribunal decision is a reminder that VAT penalties are not always the final word. Where a major change was genuinely hard to spot, a reasonable excuse argument can succeed.
Yet the safer route is prevention.
If your farming turnover is climbing toward £230,000, or your wider taxable turnover is nearing £90,000, put monthly checks in place and get advice early.
Contact Apex Accountants today to review your VAT position and keep your business protected.
It is a scheme-based addition (commonly 4%) charged on qualifying supplies by eligible farmers, kept by the farmer, rather than paid to HMRC.
HMRC guidance says you can stay on AFRS until your annual farming turnover goes above £230,000.
HMRC states the registration threshold is more than £90,000 of taxable turnover.
Penalties can be charged under Schedule 41 Finance Act 2008 for failure to notify liability, depending on facts and behaviour.
HMRC guidance explains you can request a review or appeal to a tribunal, typically within 30 days of the relevant letter.
Not automatically. Payment helps, but penalties depend on notification failures and whether a reasonable excuse exists. The Julian case shows a penalty can still be challenged successfully on the facts.
These are the questions we see most often from farming and diversified rural businesses, based on recurring VAT registration and penalty queries:
In most cases, yes, when taxable turnover exceeds £90,000 on a rolling 12-month basis, or you expect to exceed it in the next 30 days.
Yes. AFRS has its own £230,000 exit test and other conditions, plus general VAT rules can still bite depending on supplies and structure.
Rare, yet the Julian decision shows it can happen where the change was poorly publicised and it was objectively reasonable the taxpayer did not know.
Normally 30 days, either for review or appeal, depending on the stage.
A UK tax tribunal has ruled that operators of community electric-vehicle (EV) charge points may apply the 5% reduced VAT...
A recent UK tax tribunal decision in Story Terrace Limited v HMRC [2025] UKFTT 01554 (TC) has clarified how VAT...
Researchers examining global financial crime enforcement argue that recognising tax evasion as corruption could help governments hold financial criminals more...
Fresh HMRC figures have reignited an old VAT debate: whether the UK’s compulsory VAT registration threshold is creating a “cliff...
The UKDI fast-paced innovation competition has entered a new phase after the UK Ministry of Defence’s innovation unit, UK Defence...
The Court of Appeal has rejected the latest legal challenge to adding VAT on UK private school fees, confirming that...
Many sole traders and landlords are used to dealing with their tax once a year. Records are often pulled together...
Attracting and retaining skilled employees has become more challenging for UK businesses, particularly for growing companies that need to manage...
A growing number of independent schools have chosen to leave the Teachers’ Pension Scheme (TPS). Recent reporting, based on a...
A recent First-tier Tribunal decision on a farm VAT penalty appeal has put a spotlight on a problem many smaller...