
The Autumn 2025 Budget confirmed major changes to Individual Savings Accounts (ISAs) aimed at pushing savers out of low-yield cash and into investments. From 6 April 2027 the annual cash ISA allowance for under‑65s will fall from £20,000 to £12,000. To stop savers simply shuffling funds between accounts, new draft regulations propose anti‑avoidance measures. For example, transfers from stocks and shares ISAs into cash ISAs would be blocked, and “cash‑like” asset tests would determine what investments are allowed in a stocks and shares ISA. Crucially, HMRC has signalled it will charge a tax rate on ISA cash interest earned on cash held inside a stocks-and-shares or Innovative Finance ISA. In effect, these ISA cash rules would revive the pre-2014 rule where idle cash in a stocks and shares ISA was taxed at 20%. The new cap and anti-avoidance rules explicitly apply to savers under 65; over-65s retain a £20,000 ISA cash limit.
These rules were announced in HMRC’s November 2025 tax-free savings newsletter and are subject to industry consultation on the draft legislation. The government’s goal is to encourage long-term investing by making cash ISAs comparatively less attractive. However, the proposals have sparked concern from financial firms, and recent industry-HMRC talks suggest the plans may be softened in response.
Many investment platforms and asset managers warned that the draft ISA rules were overly complex and could deter savers. For example, AJ Bell’s CFO Michael Summersgill cautioned that taxing idle cash in a stocks-and-shares ISA would “punish retail investors for using the stocks and shares ISA the way it was designed”. He noted that money flows in and out of these ISAs routinely (contributions, dividends, withdrawals) and urged the Chancellor to avoid “horrendous complexity” in the ISA regime. Others pointed out that no ISA can truly be “cash-free” – even routine operations use cash – and that aggressive bans on cash-like assets could undermine savers’ flexibility.
After these warnings, HMRC officials held detailed discussions with industry groups. According to sources, the tone of negotiations has shifted. Platforms report a growing sense that HMRC might ease the hardest measures on cash and cash-like investments.
One leading investment platform said it was “cautiously optimistic” that HMRC will favour a principles-based approach rather than rigid rules. Another provider remarked they were “a lot more confident [HMRC is] coming around than we were this time two weeks ago”. In other words, talks have opened the door to compromise on both the proposed interest levy and on how “cash-like” is defined.
Indeed, industry participants expect final rules only after further consultation and technical refinements. HMRC has promised a full public consultation on the draft ISA Regulations ahead of implementation. As one government spokesperson told accountants, the aim is to prevent “easy circumvention” of the new cash limit, but HMRC is “listening to concerns and engaging collaboratively” with providers. This suggests some flexibility: the final framework may include targeted safeguards and guidance, rather than inflexible bans.
The proposed tax rate on ISA cash interest is still undetermined. Industry papers have speculated on flat rates around 20% or even 22%. (AJ Bell and others initially feared a 22% flat rate on such interest.) HMRC has not confirmed a rate, but a common assumption is 20%, mirroring the old regime.
What counts as “cash-like” is a grey area. Money market funds, short-dated gilts or corporate bonds could be deemed cash-like. Building societies are pushing for tighter rules here, arguing cash-rich MMFs harm bank funding. Conversely, platforms note that small cash buffers and money-market holdings help investors ease into equities. Freetrade’s Alex Campbell calls cash-like funds “a perfect stepping stone into investing” for novices. The Treasury Committee has already asked pointed questions about what counts as cash-like, and HMRC will clarify these criteria in the consultation.
There is broad concern that restrictive ISA changes could deter savers. Tom Selby of AJ Bell warned a “heavy-handed approach” to anti-avoidance “will undermine stocks-and-shares ISAs” at a time when the government wants more retail investment. Justin White of Kaldi argued that discouraging use of cash and cash-like assets in ISAs might confuse new investors, defeating the policy’s aim to close the investment gap. In short, providers fear that discouraging safe cash buffers could backfire unless carefully balanced with investor education and flexibility.
Given these reactions, HMRC is reportedly considering softer measures. For example, rather than an automatic tax hit, regulators may rely on platforms to monitor excessive cash balances and encourage customers to invest more. One compromise under discussion would let providers set proportionate cash thresholds and flag idle balances, instead of blanket bans. Providers could also agree not to offer artificially high interest rates on ISA cash, removing the arbitrage that the tax charge seeks to close. IG Group’s Michael Healy notes platforms already track ISA cash levels and could distinguish normal “transactional” cash from long-term parked cash.
On money market funds, HMRC may opt for targeted restrictions rather than an outright ban. A source said regulators now recognise that banning MMFs “outright could do more harm than good for investors”. Safeguards might include limiting high-interest MMFs or classifying them as cash-like, rather than excluding all such funds. Importantly, any transitional cash (e.g., pending investment) is expected to be carved out of the tax levy.
On transfers, HMRC appears set on the no-transfer rule as a hard line but might clarify exceptions. For instance, existing ISAs opened before the change may be grandfathered, and normal intra-ISA transfers (e.g., cash ISA to cash ISA) will still work. The government has emphasised it will provide “clear guidance before the changes come into effect”, so providers and savers can prepare.
At a glance, the likely outcome is a framework where savers can still hold some cash in investment ISAs, but large, long-term cash positions lose their tax advantage. A practical compromise could involve:
While details await legislation, platforms are already modelling responses. Firms preparing now will adapt their ISA account structures and customer communications before April 2027.
At Apex Accountants, we’re monitoring these ISA developments closely to help clients adapt. Our services include:
Our experts simplify complex tax news into actionable advice. If you’re concerned about how the ISA reforms might affect your savings or investments, contact Apex Accountants for a consultation. We’ll help you make the most of the current ISA rules and prepare for the changes ahead.
In summary, the UK government’s ISA reforms aim to steer savers toward investment accounts, but the strongest measures (like high cash-interest taxes and strict cash-like tests) may be trimmed after industry feedback. Official drafts will follow in due course, with HMRC indicating a collaborative approach. Savers should keep an eye on developments: the broad direction is clear, but final rules may be more flexible than first feared. For now, focus on making the most of existing ISA allowances and seek professional advice to stay compliant. As always, Apex Accountants will update clients on any final ISA legislation and advise on the best strategies to protect and grow your savings.
Under the draft rules, any interest earned on cash held in a stocks-and-shares or IF ISA would lose its tax-free status. The government’s current plan is a flat charge of about 20% on that interest. No double taxation is intended – you would pay this special ISA charge instead of normal savings tax.
HMRC will define cash-like assets in the consultation. Likely candidates include money market funds, short-dated gilts/bonds or other very low-risk funds. The intention is to stop people using such assets to skirt the £12k cash limit. We expect guidance to clarify this well before April 2027.
Cash-to-cash ISA transfers remain allowed. However, transfers from a stocks & shares or IF ISA into a cash ISA would be blocked under the new rules. All other ISA-to-ISA transfers (e.g. between cash ISAs, or within stocks & shares ISAs) should still work normally.
The proposals don’t ban holding any cash in investment ISAs, they target excessive cash balances. HMRC is aware that savers need some liquidity. Early guidance suggests small cash buffers (for example, unsettled trades or dividend income waiting to reinvest) may be exempt from the interest charge.
The new rules are set to apply from 6 April 2027. HMRC will consult on the draft legislation before then. Expect technical details to emerge throughout 2026. It’s prudent to plan for the changes, but final outcomes could be milder than originally drafted.
The position is now much clearer. Retail access to certain crypto exchange-traded notes (crypto ETNs) in an IFISA was reopened...
The VAT payroll fraud case in brief On 21 April 2026, a Scottish court case ended with four prison sentences...
Slow adoption despite clear government deadlines HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) achieved a major milestone on 6 April 2026, when...
A recent case in Shetland has put the spotlight on VAT fraud and confiscation orders in the UK. A businessman...
Since April 2025, the UK government has abolished the Furnished Holiday Lettings (FHL) tax regime, aligning short-term rental profits with...
A cautionary tale of unpaid taxes In mid-April 2026, the Insolvency Service disqualified Alex Shorthose from serving as a director...
From 6 April 2026, self-employed childminders with qualifying income over £50,000 must use Making Tax Digital for Income Tax. The...
A sticky dispute that went all the way back to tribunal In late March 2026 the First‑tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)...
In a recent case in Glasgow, two restaurant owners were found guilty of carrying out nearly a £700,000 VAT fraud...
Starbucks UK’s tax credit situation highlights that sales growth does not necessarily lead to tax liabilities. Despite reporting a turnover...