
HM Revenue & Customs is increasing scrutiny of VAT practices across the UK construction sector as part of a wider effort to tackle tax fraud and supply-chain abuse. Particular attention is now being given to the VAT reverse charge in the construction industry, with compliance teams actively reviewing how businesses apply the rules in subcontracting arrangements. Where errors are identified, HMRC is issuing assessments, penalties and compliance notices.
The tougher stance marks a shift from HMRC’s earlier “light-touch” approach following the introduction of the reverse charge rules in March 2021. At the same time, new powers announced in the Autumn Budget 2025 will come into force from April 2026, allowing HMRC to cancel companies’ Gross Payment Status and impose penalties on directors if they are linked to fraudulent supply chains.
The move reflects growing concern within government about organised tax evasion within construction, where complex subcontracting arrangements can make VAT fraud easier to conceal.
The VAT Domestic Reverse Charge for building and construction services was introduced in March 2021 to reduce fraud in the industry. The mechanism transfers the responsibility for accounting for VAT from the supplier to the customer in certain transactions.
Instead of charging VAT, subcontractors invoice contractors without VAT and include wording confirming that the reverse charge applies. The contractor then accounts for both the output and input VAT on its own VAT return.
HMRC initially focused on helping businesses understand the new rules. However, the tax authority has now moved towards stricter enforcement as part of wider efforts to reduce the UK tax gap and strengthen VAT compliance for construction companies UK.
Compliance teams are reviewing transactions more closely and raising assessments where businesses incorrectly charge VAT or fail to apply the reverse charge.
The construction sector has historically been vulnerable to VAT fraud due to the complexity of subcontracting chains and the interaction of CIS and VAT rules for construction businesses.
One common fraud involves so-called “missing traders”. In these arrangements a supplier charges VAT but disappears before paying the tax to HMRC. The reverse charge mechanism removes this opportunity by shifting the VAT liability to the contractor receiving the services.
The reverse charge applies where:
Certain transactions remain outside the rules, including zero-rated supplies such as new residential construction and work carried out for private homeowners.
Alongside stronger enforcement of existing VAT rules, the government is introducing new measures to combat supply-chain fraud within the Construction Industry Scheme.
Under legislation expected to take effect from 6 April 2026, HMRC will gain new powers to:
These reforms were announced as part of the government’s wider strategy to close the tax gap and tackle organised financial crime within labour supply chains.
The increased enforcement will affect a wide range of participants in the construction sector, including:
Even businesses that operate legitimately may face greater scrutiny if they work with suppliers later found to be involved in tax fraud.
The tightening of HMRC enforcement signals a significant shift in the tax authority’s approach to the construction industry.
For several years after the reverse charge was introduced, HMRC focused on educating businesses about the rules. That phase is now ending. The increased level of compliance activity suggests that HMRC believes most businesses should now be capable of applying the rules correctly.
This creates several practical risks for contractors and subcontractors.
Cash-flow pressures are one of the most immediate effects. Because subcontractors no longer collect VAT on invoices under the reverse charge, they lose a temporary working-capital advantage.
Administrative complexity is another challenge. Businesses must determine whether the reverse charge applies to each transaction and confirm the status of their customers.
The forthcoming CIS reforms also introduce a new level of risk for directors. The “knew or should have known” test means companies will be expected to perform meaningful due diligence on suppliers rather than relying on basic checks.
For construction firms, the consequences of non-compliance can be serious.
Potential impacts include:
At the same time, stronger enforcement may benefit compliant businesses by reducing unfair competition from operators who evade tax.
Companies that maintain robust VAT procedures and carry out proper supply-chain checks will be better positioned to withstand increased scrutiny and strengthen VAT compliance for construction companies UK.
Construction businesses should consider the following steps to stay compliant with CIS and VAT rules for construction businesses:
Taking proactive steps now can reduce the risk of costly HMRC disputes later.
As HMRC increases enforcement of VAT rules in the construction sector, businesses may benefit from reviewing their compliance procedures and supply-chain controls. Errors in applying the VAT Domestic Reverse Charge or weaknesses in CIS processes can lead to penalties, payment disputes, and HMRC enquiries.
Apex Accountants & Tax Advisors supports construction companies across the UK by helping them review VAT treatments, strengthen invoicing and accounting processes, and carry out supply chain due diligence on subcontractors and labour providers. The firm also assists businesses during HMRC compliance checks and investigations, helping them respond effectively and reduce potential liabilities.
With stricter enforcement and new anti-fraud powers expected from April 2026, reviewing VAT procedures now can help construction firms avoid costly mistakes and remain compliant.
If you would like to see real examples of how VAT compliance issues arise in practice, you can read these case studies.
For tailored guidance on VAT and CIS compliance, contact Apex Accountants or book a free consultation today.
The VAT Domestic Reverse Charge is a mechanism that transfers responsibility for accounting for VAT from the supplier to the customer for certain construction services.
It applies when both the supplier and customer are VAT-registered, the services fall under the Construction Industry Scheme, and the customer is not an end user.
If VAT is charged when the reverse charge should apply, the invoice should be corrected. HMRC may raise an assessment or impose penalties if tax is misdeclared.
Gross Payment Status allows subcontractors under CIS to receive payments from contractors without tax deductions. Losing this status can significantly affect cash flow.
New rules will allow HMRC to cancel Gross Payment Status and impose penalties where businesses are linked to fraudulent supply-chain transactions.
Yes. Under the new measures, directors may face penalties where they knew or should have known that transactions were connected to tax fraud.
Slow adoption despite clear government deadlines HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) achieved a major milestone on 6 April 2026, when...
A recent case in Shetland has put the spotlight on VAT fraud and confiscation orders in the UK. A businessman...
Since April 2025, the UK government has abolished the Furnished Holiday Lettings (FHL) tax regime, aligning short-term rental profits with...
A cautionary tale of unpaid taxes In mid-April 2026, the Insolvency Service disqualified Alex Shorthose from serving as a director...
From 6 April 2026, self-employed childminders with qualifying income over £50,000 must use Making Tax Digital for Income Tax. The...
A sticky dispute that went all the way back to tribunal In late March 2026 the First‑tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)...
In a recent case in Glasgow, two restaurant owners were found guilty of carrying out nearly a £700,000 VAT fraud...
Starbucks UK’s tax credit situation highlights that sales growth does not necessarily lead to tax liabilities. Despite reporting a turnover...
The UK’s new packaging EPR rules (often called the “packaging tax”) took effect on 1 January 2025. Any company with...
Close companies (broadly, those controlled by five or fewer shareholders or participators) and their owners have new reporting requirements under...